Raleigh, N.C. — North Carolina voters overwhelmingly want people to present some form of identification at the polls before casting a ballot, according to a WRAL News poll released Tuesday.
SurveyUSA polled 641 registered voters statewide between Saturday and Monday and found that 69 percent want to require a photo ID to vote, while another 10 percent want an ID that doesn't necessarily have a photo. Only 16 percent said voters shouldn't have to present an ID at the polls.
The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
The idea seems to have support across the political spectrum, with 90 percent of Republicans, 56 percent of Democrats and two-thirds of independents calling for a photo voter ID.
When examined through the lens of the presidential campaign, however, partisan fault lines start to appear.
Among supporters of Republican nominee Mitt Romney, 93 percent support photo ID, and just 4 percent say no ID should be needed. Meanwhile, only 46 percent of President Barack Obama's supporters want to see a photo ID for voters, while 29 percent want no ID.
The topic has been highly politicized. Republicans say photo IDs are needed to prevent voter fraud, but Democratic Gov. Beverly Perdue vetoed a voter ID bill passed last year by GOP lawmakers.
Gubernatorial candidate Pat McCrory urged voters this spring to take IDs to the polls to make a point. U.S. Sen. Richard Burr says requiring identification is just common sense.
"You can't cash a check without photo ID. Is the threshold for voting less than the threshold for cashing a check?" Burr said Tuesday.
Democratic leaders and civil rights groups say there's a big difference – cashing a check is not a constitutional right.
Bob Hall, executive director of political watchdog group Democracy North Carolina, said requiring a photo ID would stop people from exercising their right to vote.
"There are about 400,000 people that do not have a photo ID," Hall said. "Most of them are elderly, (and) they've stopped driving. They're disproportionately African-American. They're poor, more often than not."
The threat of voter impersonation is a fiction, he said, noting that study after study has found only a handful of cases nationwide.
Johnnie McLean, deputy director of the State Board of Elections, said most voter fraud involves registrations, double voting or mail-in ballots. Supporters of photo IDs may not realize that what they want at the polls wouldn't stop any of those problems, she said.
"I think that what it's going to produce is simply a perceived level of comfort to those people," McLean said.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
And that's great... FOR YOU.
But given there are literally millions of people who don't have the ID you do, perhaps you might be able to realize not everyone is as lucky as you in being able to get the help you do in obtaining an ID and keeping it current (or being able to afford one in states it's not free)
Since less than 2 people per election, nationwide, have been found to engage in voter fraud, why do you want to spend millions of wasted dollars AND potentially disenfranchise those millions of legal voters just to possibly stop those 2 people?
It's great you favor a closer look at absentee ballots- that's someplace REAL fraud actually happens... but voter ID laws don't help with that issue at all.
October 5, 2012 9:23 a.m.
October 4, 2012 6:19 p.m.
Anyway... there's absolutely 0 common sense in spending millions of dollars to 'fix' a problem that doesn't exist, and whose solution won't stop any significant amount of fraud (because there isn't any significant amount of in-person voter fraud) but WILL potentially cause a lot of old people to lose the ability to vote despite being legally qualified to.
Which is what you're suggesting you want to do.
Why do you want to waste millions of dollars and disenfranchise old people, all while not actually making ANYTHING better because the problem you're claiming to 'fix' doesn't exist? What's common sense about that?
October 4, 2012 3:07 p.m.
October 4, 2012 2:47 p.m.
October 4, 2012 2:43 p.m.