@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Wind farm delay doesn't stop Cooper from signing solar bill

Posted July 27

Gov. Roy Cooper on Thursday signed into law a measure that overhauls the state's solar energy policy, despite an 18-month moratorium on new wind farm projects that lawmakers tacked onto the plan.

— Gov. Roy Cooper on Thursday signed into law a measure that overhauls the state's solar energy policy, despite an 18-month moratorium on new wind farm projects that lawmakers tacked onto the plan.

"A strong renewable energy industry is good for our environment and our economy," Cooper said in a statement. "This bill is critical for the future of significant increases in our already booming solar industry. I strongly oppose the ugly, last-minute, politically motivated wind moratorium. However, this fragile and hard fought solar deal will be lost if I veto this legislation and that veto is sustained."

The governor said he signed an executive order directing the state Department of Environmental Quality to work with wind energy firms on reviewing permits for proposed projects and checking on prospective sites so projects would be part of the way through the approvals process when the moratorium expires at the end of 2018.

The new law allows third-party leasing of solar arrays for rooftops and community projects, reinstates the "green source rider" that lets large energy customers tell utilities how much of their power they want to get from renewable sources, opens competitive bidding for solar and other capacity to bring prices down and doesn't change the state's renewable energy portfolio standard, which dictates that state utilities should be getting 12.5 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2021.

The changes were hashed out over nine months by various industry and environmental groups, but the package almost unraveled in the waning days of the legislative session when Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown added the wind farm moratorium.

Brown, R-Onslow, insists the holding pattern is needed so a consultant can complete maps showing where wind farms might conflict with military training operations. Military officials, who must sign off on all wind farm projects, said no pending projects in North Carolina would interfere with training.

"Regardless of Gov. Cooper’s incorrect assumptions about why I support this bill, I am grateful he signed it, which will ensure North Carolina’s military installations are fully protected while still allowing proposed new wind facilities to move forward on a prudent timeline," Brown said in a statement. "It is encouraging the governor did not ignore feedback from military advisers and risk North Carolina’s second-largest industry and the hundreds of thousands of good jobs it supports."

The moratorium means DEQ can't issue a final permit, but it doesn't stop the rest of the six- to nine-month approval process put into law by lawmakers in 2013. That process remains untested, says Bob Leker, who helped devise guidelines for wind developers as a renewable energy program manager with DEQ.

The only wind farm built in North Carolina was exempt from the permitting process after it was grandfathered into the 2013 law. But developers for that project – Amazon wind near Elizabeth City – still had to earn approvals from the U.S. Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Army Corps of Engineers and other federal and local agencies.


Wind projects in progress

Use the map to explore the wind turbine projects currently working their way through state and federal approvals. Only one project – the wind farm by Amazon – has been built so far.

 
Proposed Built

The new law will create more uncertainty for wind developers, Leker said, which have to jump through many more hoops than other types of renewable energy projects, such as solar farms.

"There's a lot at risk for a wind project," Leker, who retired in July 2016 from DEQ, said. "It's a much longer process, and there's more money at stake."

The Amazon turbines began operating last fall, and Leker said the company has become the biggest taxpayer in Pasquotank and Perquimans counties.

"The positives for us in Pasquotank County have really been enormous," Wayne Harris, director of the Elizabeth City-Pasquotank County Economic Development Commission, said.

The Amazon wind farm brings in $270,000 a year in taxes to Pasquotank County, where about half of the turbines are located. Perquimans County hauls in another $250,000.

All told, owners of the land where the turbines now spin bring in $624,000 annually from their leases.

Leker said he hasn't seen evidence of Brown's argument that the wind farms have the potential to impact military operations, especially since part of the construction process requires companies to get clearance from the DOD's Siting Clearinghouse​, which studies that very issue.

"I don't get a sense that he trusts that process maybe," Leker said. "Or maybe he doesn't know about it."

Harris is also doubtful and said the military officials his county worked with were "beyond professional" during the approval process. He was particularly critical of a claim from Brown and other lawmakers that military officials downplayed their concerns about wind farms to avoid crossing their previous commander-in-chief.

"It's really kind of insulting to the military to think that they would create a hazard for their own operation because they wanted to make nice to the then-Obama administration," Harris said.

Although Harris said his economic development board hasn't taken a formal position on the moratorium, he called the measure "unfortunate."

"In our part of the region, I don't think you'll find many people that feel it's necessary," Harris said.

4 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • John Archer Jul 28, 11:36 a.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    “It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”

    ― Mark Twain

  • Henry Cooper Jul 27, 5:00 p.m.
    user avatar

    I would almost be certain the net metering rate will be below retail. There is a cost to them to put your "extra" back on the grid. First is the meter you will have to have. It is a much smarter meter than the old mechanical ones or even the newer Itron meters like I have. The new meter would have to be able to ride that thin line of power. Example: 4pm home is producing more than using. 430PM someone comes home turn on the TV... Now you are breakeven lets say. Then they turn the microwave on so you are using more. It goes off and you are back to break even. It is the threshold from using to producing that will be hard to manage and will take better infrastructure outside you home.

    You would be kind of a subcontracted wholesaler.

  • Teddy Fowler Jul 27, 5:00 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    but but but you should be doing this to help prevent global warming... not to save a few pennies....

  • Andrew Stephenson Jul 27, 4:28 p.m.
    user avatar

    I'd like some more details on the net metering part of this bill.

    I'm very close to pulling the trigger on a solar array for my new house, but if the net meter rate drops below retail value, which this bill I believe allows, it's no longer financially beneficial to install the panels.

    Right now, if I were to put panels on my house, they would pay for themselves in about 9 years. If the net meter rate drops, the payoff time just goes up.