Why are there so few Muslim terrorists?

Posted April 1

"The Missing Martyrs" is by Charles Kurzman. (Deseret Photo)

Charles Kurzman, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has carved out an important scholarly niche for himself. His 1998 Oxford anthology “Liberal Islam: A Sourcebook,” for example, represents a fundamental resource on the little-known (and often studiously ignored) tradition in modern Muslim thought advocating democracy and tolerance. On Kurzman’s website at, he compiled “Islamic Statements Against Terrorism,” which is a reassuringly large number of such statements from Muslim leaders worldwide.

He’s also been publishing annual reports over the past few years on “Muslim-American Involvement with Violent Extremism.” The latest, covering 2016, shows that American residents were more likely to be murdered last year because they were Muslims than they were to die at the hands of extremist Muslims. A number of studies have demonstrated that American parents tend to seriously miscalculate the risks that their children face (see "5 Worries Parents Should Drop, And 5 They Shouldn't" on, for instance.)

The same appears to be true with respect to our evaluations of the threat posed by Islamist terrorism: A total of 123 Americans have been murdered by Muslim extremists in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001 — out of more than 240,000 homicides during the same period.

Kurzman’s 2011 Oxford volume, “The Missing Martyrs: Why There Are So Few Muslim Terrorists,” provides answers to a question that few Americans are asking. The fact is, though, that such Islamist terrorist leaders as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri have long lamented the passiveness or inactivity of the vast majority of their fellow Muslims. And they have solid reason for their dissatisfaction. Fewer than 1 in 100,000 Muslims, Kurzman points out, have rallied to the extremist cause since 9/11. In fact, as another author has argued, Islamic societies tend to be relatively nonviolent (see "No, Islam isn’t inherently violent, and the math proves it" on

“Yet,” Kurzman observes, “terrorism dominates the headlines far out of proportion to its death toll. Terrorists are grimly successful at attracting public attention. Of the thousands of violent incidents that occur around the globe each day, the world media efficiently sifts for hints of terrorist motivations, then feeds these incidents over the wire services and satellite networks to news consumers who may not realize how rare terrorism really is. In this way the media are accomplices to terrorism. They bring the perpetrators’ message to vast audiences; without these audiences, the terror would only be felt locally. Indeed, if a terrorist act occurred and nobody heard about it, it would be a failure.”

And Islamist terrorism, of course, captures the lion’s share of media attention. But there are plenty of other kinds of terrorism worldwide. American news media simply don’t devote much coverage to, say, anti-Sikh, anti-Muslim and anti-Christian violence in India.

Further, over the more than 15 decades since the close of the American Civil War in 1865, the second-most lethal terrorist act on American soil — by a considerable distance — has been Timothy McVeigh’s April 1995 bombing of a federal office building in Oklahoma City, which was motivated not by Islam, nor even by religion (McVeigh described himself as an agnostic), but by resentment toward the federal government.

Kurzman readily admits that the media are simply doing their job in reporting terrorist violence. But, he observes, the result of much media coverage is that ordinary members of the public trying to keep up with world affairs are often given a skewed picture of the prevalence of terrorism. Not, of course, that he dismisses the threat:

“The bad news for Americans is this: Islamist terrorists really are out to get you. They cannot be deterred by prison sentences, 'enhanced' interrogations, or the prospect of death. They consider the United States to be their mortal enemy, and they would like to kill as many Americans as possible, in as dramatic a way as possible.” They “are a brutal and inhumane bunch. It is worth taking them seriously,” he writes.

“The good news for Americans is this: there aren’t very many Islamist terrorists, and most of them are incompetent," Kurzman writes. "They fight each other as much as they fight anybody else, and they fight their potential state sponsors most of all. They are outlaws on the run in every country in the world, and their bases have been reduced to ever-more-wild patches of remote territory, where they have to limit their training activities to avoid satellite surveillance.”

Kurzman’s “The Missing Martyrs” provides an approachable, clear-headed perspective that will deflate several common and fundamental misconceptions about Islamist terrorism. And accurate information is always good.

Daniel Peterson teaches Arabic studies, founded BYU’s Middle Eastern Texts Initiative, directs, chairs, blogs daily at, and speaks only for himself.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Tom Baker Apr 2, 2017
    user avatar

    The same counts for almost all Muslims. Their faith does not condone violence.

  • Jeffrey Derry Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    Eric Hammond, good point however the Christian faith that I possess does not condone violence - against person or property

  • NC Tom Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    I quit reading nonsense half way through so won't comment what I am thinking. Lol.

  • Randall Lamm Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    So......Mr. Academic.
    I guess only 3 or 4 Germans were nazis?

  • Janet Ghumri Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    We need to stop allowing the media to skew the facts for shock value. We are being spoon fed the biased nuggets of information that support the current views of the media execs. We are adults and we should seek the actual facts, not just the sensational headlines. Race, Religion, Party affiliation, etc. Should not be the sole basis for a news story.

  • Matt Smithe Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    Haha, is this guy living in an alternate universe? Oh yeah, that land of make believe called academia.

    Two points: 1.) There is little reliable data on violence in the vast majority of predominantly muslim countries so his statistics are worthless. I work in statistics and I would never publish the results from analysis of these kind of data with such assurance of their reliability. 2.) I have spent significant time in different Muslim dominated cultures and these conclusions ring false to my personal experience.

    This has all the earmarks of a conclusion in search of a "study."

  • Marshall Autry Apr 1, 2017
    user avatar

    I have a question, why are so many terrorist Muslim?