What will the online sales tax bill mean for you?

Posted May 6, 2013
Updated May 10, 2013

— Congress is considering legislation that would give states the ability to require out-of-state retailers to collect sales taxes. If the measure passes, consumers would lose a loophole that has resulted in years of tax-free online shopping. Out-of-state merchants would have to collect statewide sales taxes on Internet, mail-order and other purchases — as well as any county and local sales taxes. Why is this necessary? And what will this mean for your online purchases?

Here's a guide:

Q. Don't I already pay sales taxes on Internet purchases?

A. Sometimes. Some retailers already collect sales taxes for where you live, but many don't and haven't been required to do so.

In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can't force businesses elsewhere to collect those taxes unless the company has a physical presence in that state — such as a physical retail store or an office. Retailers that operate in one or a few states typically collect taxes only for those states and not others.

Q. Does the bill help or hurt smaller local businesses?

A: Lisa Kornstein, owner of Scout and Molly's boutique in Raleigh's Cameron Village, said online sales have cut into the foot traffic in her 10-year-old store.

"All of my customers say they shop around online, and that's made it a little more challenging for the brick and mortar stores," she said.

Kornstein doesn't charge sales tax for online transactions. It's a competitive advantage on the Web, and she's afraid she might someday lose it.

"It is a benefit to be able to tell the people in other cities that we won't charge you sales tax," she said. Under the current legislation, merchants that sell $1 million or less worth of goods to residents of a certain state would not have to collect taxes on that state's behalf.

On the other hand, Kornstein says forcing out-of-state online retailers to collect sales taxes would help traditional retailers level the playing field with their online competitors.

"If you can't physically get out to shop in a store and you need to buy something online, it should be the same experience as every other customer who's walking in the stores," she said.

Q. How did my North Carolina Senators vote?

A: Both Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican Richard Burr voted in favor of the bill.

Q. Why haven't retailers collected the taxes anyway, if they are already collecting them for some states?

A. Retailers argue that it's complex to keep track of state, county and local taxes in thousands of jurisdictions across the nation. It's not just the different rates, but different rules on what products are and aren't taxed. Some states exempt clothing, for instance, and some charge taxes only when the price is above a certain amount. Bubble gum might be considered candy in one state and a tax-exempt food item in another.

Out-of-state retailers don't emphasize this, but not having to collect the taxes also makes their products cheaper, compared with in-state retailers that have to.

Q. So if the Supreme Court settled this, why is Congress getting involved?

A. There was hardly any online commerce when the Supreme Court issued its ruling two decades ago. These days, states believe they are losing out on billions of dollars in revenue collectively each year. They have been pressuring Congress to change the law, as they face budgetary constraints in funding schools, roads and other services.

The argument that it's a mess to keep track of thousands of tax rates and rules also has diminished with the advent of better software. Many national retailers have figured out how to collect those taxes. Under the bill before Congress, states would have to provide merchants with software to manage this. They also would have to designate a single office within the state to handle all out-of-state tax collections, so merchants wouldn't have to figure out where to send county and local tax payments.

Q. Will this make Internet purchases more expensive?

A. Legally speaking, it shouldn't. That's because when you buy something from a retailer that doesn't collect sales taxes for your state, you're supposed send in the taxes owed yourself.

In practice, though, few people do that, and enforcement is poor. This bill would effectively close that loophole and have the retailer collect the taxes for everyone.

Shoppers like Cathy Schemenauer may buy in person if they have to pay sales tax on all purchases. She said having to pay sales taxes on online purchases would push her away from the computer.

"It would probably get me out a little bit more," Schemenauer said.

That said, even with the sales tax, buying from an Internet retailer might be cheaper than going to a physical store, which has such expenses as rent, utilities and cashiers' wages.

Q. What happens next?

A. Nothing right away. Senate approval is just one step. It needs passage in the House and President Barack Obama's signature.

After that, individual states would have to choose to participate. So if New Jersey doesn't participate, for instance, then a retailer operating only in Oregon would not be bound to collect state, county and local taxes for New Jersey.

Under the current legislation, merchants that sell $1 million or less worth of goods to residents of a certain state would not have to collect taxes on that state's behalf.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • me2you May 9, 2013

    If all states simply what is taxed, then I'm more apt to be ok with this. Otherwise, it will be a nightmare for businesses to keep up with who gets paid what. Ridiculous.

  • TarHeelBrit May 8, 2013

    Why does this and other states want to tax it's citizens to death? Truth be told they don't give a hoot about levelling the playing field for B&M stores. All they see is another source of revenue to waste while claiming to help B&M stores.

  • May 8, 2013

    This is a bad idea all around and does not solve the SPENDING problem. Just because you take in more revenue does not mean you will not be broke. It's all about money management and government is terrible with that.

  • Z Man May 8, 2013

    I've paid taxes on some eBay purchases and I'd bet that money DIDN'T ever make it to the federal or state governments. What the heck, the government would only waste it anyway.

  • simracer68 May 8, 2013

    When did Burr vote for the bill? The roll call on that vote that I saw showed Hagan as a Yay (yes) vote and Burr as a Not Voting vote. Clarify or correct please WRAL.

  • jblake1932 May 8, 2013

    Speaking of taxes in NC, I bought gas in Roanoke, VA Mon. I paid 3.12 a gallon. Once home in north central NC, gas is 3.49 a gallon!! Good ole Tarheel taxes at it's best!!

  • Vietnam Vet May 6, 2013

    We already pay sales tax in our state of residence if the online retailer has a presence in our state, otherwise generally not. Just another case of mismanaged government looking for another revenue stream to waste on give away programs and more mismanagement!