Walker doesn't 'have a qualm' about war with Mexico

Posted September 18, 2014
Updated September 19, 2014

Mark Walker, congressional candidate

— Mark Walker may be a Baptist minister, but when asked about immigration policy this summer, he didn't mention anything about turning the other cheek.

Walker is the Republican running to replace retiring 6th District Congressman Howard Coble. He faces Democrat Laura Fjeld. 

In a video first posted on the liberal Daily Kos website and circulated by Fjeld's campaign, Walker is seen responding to an immigration question during a June forum with a Rockingham County tea party group. He starts by advocating broader use of the National Guard and then appears to call for stronger measures.

"But I would tell you, if you have foreigners who are sneaking in with drug cartels, to me that is a national threat, and if we got to go laser or blitz somebody with a couple of fighter jets for a little while to make our point, I don’t have a problem with that either," Walker said, garnering applause from the audience. 

A followup question asked if he would have qualms about going to war with Mexico.

"Well, we did it before. If we need to do it again, I don’t have a qualm about it," the candidate said.

On his website, Walker offers a two-bullet-point position on immigration that says he is opposed to amnesty and calls for a guest worker program once the border has been secured. Fighter jets aren't mentioned.

The U.S. State Department describes relations with Mexico as "strong and vital," adding, "The scope of U.S.-Mexican relations is broad and goes beyond diplomatic and official relations. It entails extensive commercial, cultural and educational ties, with some $1.4 billion of two-way trade and hundreds of thousands of legal border crossings each day."

Walker says he was making a joke in order to make a point. 

"This was obviously a tongue-in-cheek comment that highlights the very serious nature of our situation at the border," Walker said through a spokesman. "Violent drug cartels and other criminals that cross our border continue to pose a significant threat to our country and our people. Meanwhile, President Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress continue to delay true immigration reform because it is not politically expedient. It's time for true change, and that's what I intend to bring to Washington, D.C."

Asked for reaction, Fjeld said, "This is yet another example of Mark Walker's extreme and outrageous positions. It's plain crazy."


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • ncouterbanks69 Sep 23, 2014

    View quoted thread

    LOL...reading comprehension is difficult for some so I will help. The bottom line is this:
    Law Abiding tax paying citizens > criminals

  • canucmypointofview Sep 23, 2014

    Walker for President

  • Joe Crain Sep 23, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    This sounds familiar. Where have I heard of a wall built on a border where there were armed guards at the top poised to shoot anyone who tried to cross to better their lives?? Berlin, Germany 1961-1989

  • miseem Sep 22, 2014

    View quoted thread

    That old attack the messenger, not the message. Helps deflect some of the sting from facts you don't want to hear. But as Outerbanks claims, logic supports Walker and his desire to invade Mexico.

  • archmaker Sep 22, 2014

    View quoted thread

    this was not a "set up" or as Sarah Palin™ calls "gotcha journalism."
    the guy was asked a question by his base followers - a tea party group - and he answered them.

  • ncouterbanks69 Sep 22, 2014

    View quoted thread

    Just as I knew there are those that support criminals. I see that as the truly sad part and logic supports my conclusions. The good of society > criminals its really not that difficult.

  • Ijaz Fahted Sep 22, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Are you saying that he did not in fact say these things?

  • Ijaz Fahted Sep 22, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Not a single one? Wow. Just how many candidates were there, and how many different races? Not a single one? You'll have to forgive me if I say I don't believe you a bit.

  • Paladin2 Sep 22, 2014

    Typical set up by the liberal "journalists" and he walked right into it. The "journalists' are more interested in blindsiding a Democratic opponent that talking about the issue.

  • Bobby Medlin Sep 22, 2014
    user avatar

    I knew some comments would agree with this fool. Wow.