Local News

Wal-Mart Altercation Leads to Charges

Posted February 18, 2008

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— Donovan Patrick Williams faces weapons and drug charges after an incident outside the Greenville Wal-Mart Friday.

According to police, Williams accosted a bi-racial couple outside the store, then shot at their vehicle. Williams was charged with assault with a deadly weapon, discharging a firearm, marijuana possession and five other misdemeanors.

At a hearing on Monday, District Attorney Clark Everett declined to add a hate crimes charge to those Williams is facing. The racial aspect of Williams' alleged crimes will be taken into account in sentencing, Greenville police said.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Sunkist Feb 19, 2008

    He need anger management classes/jail time. For whatever reason that got the situation to the level that he had to fire a gun is scary enough. You, my self or family members, my child your child could have taken that bullet. For a very foolish reason. I don't think color has nothing to do with this. If it had been a black couple or white couple a gun shouldn't had been used into this.

  • Timbo Feb 18, 2008

    Hate crime charges are a joke. Indicting people on their beliefs or what they think is ridiculous. Assault is already a crime. What next? Indicting people that don't think like the religious right, or the the lunatic left?

    Back when Johnson was still in Texas, they asked him what he thought about a law making lynching illegal. He said something to the effect "I thought murder was already illegal?".

    The point is, "hate crime" laws, "assault on a government official" laws, etc... are layered on laws that already exist. The *ONLY* reason for their existence is because legislators are pandering to voting blocks so they can look busy and get re-elected.

    If I was a juror, I would never convict anyone on those or similar laws.

  • Spirit Warrior BallReceptable Feb 18, 2008

    irishale's comments are circumloquacious, and make no sense at all. If I understand you correctly, you're saying it's a hate crime, but shouldn't be punished as a hate crime.

    To clarify - http://www.usdoj.gov/crs/pubs/htecrm.htm

    A distinguishing characteristic of a hate crime charge is that it's outcome causes fear, tension and unrest in the community.

    It looks like the incident in Greenville was an isolated incident by some knucklehead with a chip on his shoulder.

    I've made a mental note to stay out of Greenville though.

  • irishale Feb 18, 2008

    Bravo to District Attorney Clark Everett... this type of crime is by nature a 'hate crime'... and there's no need to charge it as such. To do so makes all other instances like this when race is not involved seem less serious or important.