Veto fight ahead over elections board rewrite

Posted April 11

— State legislative leaders and Gov. Roy Cooper are likely headed for another veto fight, this time over a measure that would reconfigure the state's oversight of elections, ethics and lobbying. Lawmakers sent the bill to Cooper's desk Tuesday.

In December 2016 during a special session, state lawmakers approved a proposal to do away with the existing State Board of Elections and replace it with the state's ethics board, half appointed by the governor and the other half appointed by state lawmakers. That law also gave Republicans control of all local elections boards in each election year.

Cooper sued to block the law, saying it violated the separation of powers in the state constitution, and a three-judge panel agreed last month.

Senate Bill 68 is an attempt to revive some of that enjoined law, crafted to avoid the constitutional pitfalls that plagued the first version.

It would still put what's now the State Ethics Commission in charge of elections, campaign finance and lobbying regulation. The governor would appoint all eight members of the new board – four from each party – although he or she would be limited to nominations submitted by the parties. He or she would also have the authority to remove any board member who misses more than two consecutive meetings.

"We believe that combining these functions under one board is the better way to go forward in trying to administer elections, campaign finance, lobbying and ethics," said House sponsor Rep. David Lewis, R-Harnett.

Senate Bill 68, like the earlier law, increases the size of county boards of elections from three to four members, two from each party, which critics warn will be a recipe for "deadlock and dysfunction." But supporters of the measure say tied votes can be resolved by the state board with a simple majority vote of five members.

Lewis said having equal party representation on local and state elections boards will increase public confidence that their elections are being run in a bipartisan manner.

The final version of the proposal passed the House with little debate Tuesday afternoon, 72-42, and quickly moved to the Senate.

Senate Democrats complained that the creation of the new Bipartisan Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement wasn't a bipartisan effort – either in December or now.

"This is bipartisan in name only," said Sen. Angela Bryant, D-Nash.

Bryant said some provisions in the legislation were practically "hyperpartisan," such as giving GOP the chair of elections boards during every major statewide election and allowing state elections director Kim Strach, whom Republicans appointed in 2013, to remain in her position. Bryant also noted the bill doesn't spell out how tie votes on some types of decisions will be resolved.

"We're really setting up a structure for partisan deadlock," she said.

Sen. Andrew Brock, R-Davie, said he was confident that board members would put the process above party politics.

"The people of North Carolina want to see a fair process and don't want one with a leg up over the other," Brock said.

The Senate then voted along party lines 29-13 to approve the bill, sending it to Cooper.

Cooper has already said he intends to veto the measure, calling it a GOP attempt to curtail voting rights.

"Their first attempt to gain control of elections boards through a law passed in December was recently found unconstitutional. And now the legislature is at it again, simply rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic," Cooper wrote in a post on Medium. "The bill before the House today is another attempt to rig our state and county elections boards, doubling down on a Republican goal of reducing early voting, same-day registration and other tools that make it easier to vote."

1 Comment

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Robert Richardson Apr 12, 10:25 a.m.
    user avatar

    These Republicans are doing everything they can to keep themselves in power.