US Supreme Court tosses NC legislative districts; no special election ordered

Posted June 5

— The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld without comment a lower court's ruling that North Carolina lawmakers illegally relied too much on the race of voters when they drew 28 state House and state Senate districts in 2011.

But the justices vacated the court's order to immediately redraw the districts and hold a special election this year, saying other remedies should be considered.

"Although this Court has never addressed whether or when a special election may be a proper remedy for a racial gerrymander, obvious considerations include the severity and nature of the particular constitutional violation, the extent of the likely disruption to the ordinary processes of governance if early elections are imposed, and the need to act with proper judicial restraint when intruding on state sovereignty," the high court ruled. "Rather than undertaking such an analysis in this case, the District Court addressed the balance of equities in only the most cursory fashion."

The Supreme Court ruling sends the matter back to the lower court, which could order new districts in time for the regular cycle of elections in 2018.

Anita Earls, executive director of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which represented the plaintiffs in the case, said she plans to keep pushing for new districts and new elections this year.

"It means voters will continue to suffer the harms they've had all along being in districts that are not fairly drawn," Earls said of the Supreme Court's decision not to uphold the lower court's call for immediate changes.

Republican legislative leaders applauded the decision to vacate the court order calling for a special election.

"It's very difficult to sit and draw maps when the rules keep changing as to what you're required to do and what's upheld," said Sen. Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell. "Hopefully, now moving forward to do fair and legal districts, we'll have a clear set of rules to know what we need to do as a General Assembly that are established, and most importantly, the federal courts have to respect our state constitution and our state laws."

Democrats hope new district maps will help them break the Republican stranglehold on the state legislature.

Democrats need to capture three House seats or six Senate seats currently held by Republicans to eliminate the GOP's veto-proof majorities. That would enhance the power of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper.

"Whether the election is November 2018 or earlier, redrawing the districts is good for our democracy by leveling the playing field for free and fair elections," Cooper said in a statement. "The people should be able to choose their representatives in competitive districts instead of the representatives being able to choose the people in lopsided, partisan districts."

A panel of three federal judges last August struck down the 19 House and nine Senate districts, determining that the Republican-controlled General Assembly had wrongly packed too many black voters into specific House and Senate districts to make other districts more favorable to GOP candidates.

"These districts went street by street, dividing neighbors from each other, dividing precincts in ways that just didn't make sense other than race," Earls said. "Now, we'll have districts that follow county lines and make more sense."

See the districts ruled unconstitutional

28 districts

The high court's action follows last month's ruling in which the justices struck down two North Carolina congressional districts on the same grounds.

Good-government watchdog groups called for lawmakers to pass legislation creating a nonpartisan commission to handle redistricting in the future.

"These two lawsuits are among more than 40 instances where a court has had to intervene in NC redistricting since 1980. North Carolina needs to change the way it does redistricting," Jane Pinsky, executive director of the North Carolina Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform, said in a statement. "We need a nonpartisan process that allows citizens to decide who represents them, not one that permits legislators to choose who their voters will be."

"It's, to the voter, another reminder that we have a broken redistricting process in North Carolina," said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina.

"While there's always partisan interests in redistricting, I think what we'll see districts that are much more fair and much more easy for the public to understand," Earls said.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Tom Baker Jun 5, 8:38 p.m.
    user avatar

    Considering that presidents get elected by people and not by acres, plus the fact that the current president is a minority president at best, I see strong support for liberalism. With Trump's approval rating being lower than the support for impeachment, his chances for reelection will depend on his show man qualities only.

  • Michael Bawden Jun 5, 6:55 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Where do I start, Meg Scott Phipps, Mike Easley, Edmiston, Jim Black, Bev Perdue, the payoff to a Republican to switch parties. Then like ALL across the country, OBAMACARE and tripling of premiums. That leaked to local races. The entire country save for North East and Left coast went Republican. Trump being president is a country fed up with liberalism.

  • Bill Hale Jun 5, 5:07 p.m.
    user avatar

    If the Democrats in the General Assembly were so good at gerrymandering in their favor, how did the Republicans take over the House and Senate in the 2010 elections under the Democrats' "gerrymandered" districts?

  • Stacie Hagwood Jun 5, 4:02 p.m.
    user avatar

    I wonder how many teachers could have been hired for the money spent defending bad governmental practices?

  • Clarence Drumgoole Jun 5, 2:10 p.m.
    user avatar

    The Court has Spoken!

  • Michael Bawden Jun 5, 1:32 p.m.
    user avatar

    After 100 years of democrat rule and gerrymandering by democrats along racial lines, everyone is calling on Republicans to take high road and do "non-partisan" districting. I say let the Republicans have a 100 years. Results of this decision, Republicans will STILL pigeon hole democrats together and will be forced to break up African-American blocks in 12th. So we will have LESS African-American legislators. So the 12th which democrats justified in the 90's and now want to dismantle the district in 2017. Liberals have to explain that. Only democrats can create racially gerrymandered districts?

  • Edward Anderson Jun 5, 12:49 p.m.
    user avatar

    Since everybody here seem to agree that having some form of nonpartisan redistricting take the place of our current system *HOW* can we the voters force this to happen?

  • John Kaiser Jun 5, 12:18 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    This. There is no question about it. Politicians can't be trusted to be their own bosses. And the way the system works in most statements that is essentially the case. Democrats and Republicans alike try to rig the system as much as they can in their favor. They serve the interests of party over state/country.

  • Chad Stinner Jun 5, 11:34 a.m.
    user avatar

    Basically, politicians should have no part in drawing districts. It should be done by non partisan groups that follow specific rules when creating the algorithm. It's been done several times recently.

    Computer models etc are easy to verify against if some form of biased was use to create them making audits easy and political nonsense extremely difficult.

  • Anna Temple Jun 5, 10:43 a.m.
    user avatar

    When will nc legislature stop spending millions of dollars on bigotry? Come on boys, man up