UNC system chairman: 'We don't discriminate against anybody'

Posted May 10
Updated May 17

— University of North Carolina system leaders insisted Tuesday that the 17-campus system doesn't violate anyone's civil rights, but yet they find themselves trying to negotiate a tricky position as the state and federal governments battle over the controversial House Bill 2.

The U.S. Department of Justice sued the UNC system and the state on Monday, alleging that House Bill 2 violates Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act and the Title IX education gender-equity law by requiring transgender people to use public bathrooms that match the gender listed on their birth certificate and doesn't allow them to choose the bathroom where they feel most comfortable.

"We don't discriminate against anybody," Louis Bissette, chairman of the UNC Board of Governors, said following a nearly three-hour, closed-door meeting of the board to discuss the lawsuit.

"Our anti-discrimination policies are in effect, as they have been for years and years and years," Bissette said. "There's been no change in that, and there will be no change in that."

"We've not violated any provision of Title IX or Title VII as it relates to House Bill 2," UNC President Margaret Spellings said, agreeing with Bissette that no changes are planned in any campus' nondiscrimination policies and noting that House Bill 2 doesn't spell out how to enforce the bathroom regulations or any penalties for violators.

UNC leaders, however, wouldn't take a stand on the issue, saying they want to focus on their education mission while the courts settle the debate. Their next step is to hire a lawyer to defend the Justice Department suit.

"You can imagine, if you're a citizen and you have a state law and a federal law, and you don't really know which one is controlling at a certain point in time, it's very frustrating that you don't know which one to abide by," Bissette said.

The lawsuit puts about $1.4 billion in federal funding to the university system, including financial aid and research grants, at risk if campuses are found to be out of compliance with nondiscrimination laws.

"The board and I are completely committed and very clear that we can't operate this place without federal funding, and we would not put that at risk," Spellings said.

The Justice Department hasn't threatened to withhold any federal funding yet, she said, noting that system administrators and lawyers continue to discuss how to resolve the issue with government lawyers.

"I don't think they have any greater interest in poor and minority students losing financial aid than we do," she said.

The 10 Republican U.S. House members from North Carolina sent a letter to U.S. Education Secretary John King on Monday, demanding assurences by Friday that no federal education money would be pulled from the UNC system.

"We strongly believe that any move to withhold federal (education) funding from North Carolina is without legal merit and an unprecedented overreach by the federal government," the House members wrote in the letter.

Students and faculty at area UNC campuses said Tuesday that they feel squeezed by the House Bill 2 battle.

"This is a huge ripple effect. This is dropping a boulder into a pond," said Brett Chambers, an adjunct lecturer in the Department of Mass Communication at North Carolina Central University. "We're going to all feel the pain if this plays out in a negative way and the money is withdrawn. I don't think the DOJ would have put that on the table if they weren't going to play that. You don't pull a gun if you're not willing to shoot."

Spellings has said that the UNC system plans to comply with both state and federal law, and Michael Gerhardt, the Samuel Ashe Distinguished Professor of Constitutional Law at the UNC School of Law, said that balance is difficult in the case.

"HB2 is one thing it has to consider complying with, but federal law really trumps that, and it has to make sure it's complying with federal law at all times," Gerhardt said. "It's going to head toward the federal government prevailing. There's no question, when it comes to federal law, the federal government determines what federal law is."

UNC System Student Body President and student board member, Zack King, said he hopes the discussion about House Bill 2 will continue at the university.

"I know that students and student leaders have really been calling for a stand against HB2," he said. "I am very confident the board is heading in the right direction when it comes to this. I think we are headed, hopefully, for a resolution."


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Pat Trisha May 11, 6:09 p.m.
    user avatar

    I don't trust that Spellings woman as far as I can throw her. And that Louis Bissette looks like he's still in the closet - the same closet where he keeps a portrait of J. Edgar Hoover in drag.

  • Demute Sainte May 11, 6:03 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    And so your saying I will not be rejected because my skin color doesnt match the race based scholarship? You REALLY believe that?

    And yes... my stance with HB2 IS about safety. For my children. I can take pretty good care of myself. Its naive to think predators dont hang out in women and girls bathrooms, showers and changing facilities. If you dont believe men dress up or otherwise disguise themselves to enter these facilities and commit crimes? Try google then get back with me.

  • Tripp Weiland May 11, 3:16 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    You could apply for a minority scholarship for NCCU which is part of the UNC system.

  • Tripp Weiland May 11, 3:02 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    If you believe it has anything to do with safety, then you my friend, are the one wearing blinders.

  • Demute Sainte May 11, 2:40 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Sorry... still safety.
    I have read the Christian Bible from front to back on several occasions, and never once came across gender identity. I did read something about men wearing womens clothes as being bad.... but really... my comments are about safety. Remove the blinders.

  • Demute Sainte May 11, 1:55 p.m.
    user avatar

    I wonder... as a white male, if I applied for a black scholarship at UNC because I "self identify" as being black... would they allow this... or would they discriminate against my biological race? Anyone?

    According to the UNC website, there are over 100 scholarships available to minorities.... seems pretty discriminatory to me.

  • Johnathan Gault May 11, 1:40 p.m.
    user avatar

    I am calling BS on this one. You do discriminate against white males and Christians. Therefore I find it quite comical to see that you are now the victims of judicial activism. If only we had a governing body that could enact laws to protect the citizenry.

  • Doug Smallen May 11, 1:33 p.m.
    user avatar

    T Kdawg i am actually an Atheist and still see the difference, Christians DO have the same rights as a LGBT person. You just have to take off the Mule Blinders to see that way.

  • Tee Kdawg May 11, 12:09 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Oh, so contrary to what "Demute Sainte" is saying in an earlier comment on here, it ISN'T about safety then, but rather your personal beliefs?

  • Tee Kdawg May 11, 12:06 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Nope. Why don't you just admit that it isn't about "safety" or whatever nonsense you are pushing, but rather your interpretation of some book written piecemeal thousands of years ago by goat herders halfway across the globe that now you in turn want the rest of the world to live by?