UNC-CH's total price tag for academic scandal tops $10M

Posted October 26, 2015

Ken Wainstein is scheduled to meet June 20, 2014, with the UNC Board of Governors to provide a "high-level update" on the probe into academic irregularities involving athletes. According to the university, Wainstein will address the scope of his work, but won't share any factual findings or conclusions from his still-ongoing investigation.

— The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill says it has spent more than $7.5 million to date for legal and public relations help with its academic fraud scandal.

Including the costs of a massive report on the issue released last year, that brings the price tag of the scandal to more than $10.6 million – money university officials say did not come from tuition dollars or state funding.

In a release posted to UNC-Chapel Hill's Carolina Commitment website Monday, school officials said the majority of the nearly $7.6 million it paid to three law firms and one public relations agency reflected work between mid-2014 and mid-2015, as well as one firm's work back to late 2012.

The new figures, released in response to a public records request from The News & Observer, come more than a year after former federal prosecutor Kenneth Wainstein released a 131-page report that showed academic advisers at UNC-Chapel Hill steered student-athletes for 18 years toward classes that never met and required only a short paper to pass. The university has since found two new NCAA violations involving improper academic assistance given to former women's basketball players, as well as soccer violations.

Last November, the university reported paying $3.1 million for the Wainstein investigation, conducted by the law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. That amount, officials said, is separate from the expenses the university reported Monday.

Rick White, associate vice chancellor of communications and public affairs, said university leaders are committed to not using state funds. But he was unable to provide a breakdown of the sources of the payments Monday, because he said the firms could have been paid from a number of different unrestricted funds, such as the university's investment accounts.

"It would come from different sources at different times," White said. "They're just managing those resources as any organization would manage those resources."

White said the legal and public relations costs paid for the scandal so far haven't impacted the university's $2.5 billion operating budget, but "by definition, any dollar I spend here I can't spend somewhere else."

"Certainly, I would tell you we'd rather not have to spend the money this way, but it's the right thing to do," White said.

The totals released Monday reflect payments related to lawsuits filed by former student-athletes and employees, responses to the NCAA and other information requests.

  • Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP received about $1.9 million in payments related to the scandal to provide counsel for four lawsuits, as well as a request for information from the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. In response to the Wainstein report, the accrediting agency wanted to know whether the school was in compliance with several accreditation standards.
  • Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP received about $2.7 million after the firm's release of the Wainstein report for the processing of public records.
  • Bond Schoeneck & King Attorneys received about $1.3 million for "professional services and consultation" dating to November 2012 related to "the NCAA and other Department of Athletics matters."
  • Daniel J. Edelman Inc. received about $1.7 million for seven months of "strategic public relations advice and services" regarding the scandal and other issues.

In the release, the university said Edelman began providing services in June 2014, five months after UNC hired its vice chancellor for communications and public relations. The firm worked on preparations for the Wainstein report's release.

"The agency helped staff the University’s communications office – which historically had been severely under-resourced compared with peer campuses – and supported the management of media relations, content creation (digital, social media and websites), strategic services (such as video production), internal communications, and other related areas," the university said.

Since January 2015, the release said, "Edelman has primarily provided strategic support on other issues and topics as the Office of Communications and Public Affairs added staff."

White said it's common for the university to hire additional resources for help in specialized areas. Outside patent attorneys, for example, help labs protect their intellectual property during the research process. The release notes it's a more cost-effective strategy in some cases than hiring in-house workers.

While White was unable to say how the costs of years of scandal-related spending compare to the normal costs of outside counsel, he said it's "certainly large."

"It's been a rather unusual time," White said. "We've acknowledged that is a lot of money."

In the post, UNC officials noted the "unprecedented combination of simultaneous issues," the university has dealt with over the past few years, including lawsuits, a pending NCAA investigation and "a sharply rising volume of regular public records requests."

The school now employs about nine workers in its public records office at a combined cost of nearly $600,000 annually.

Per state law, public entities such as state agencies and public universities must release records upon request "as promptly as possible."

Just last week, the university released more than 200,000 pages of records lawyers reviewed during the creation of the Wainstein report. School officials, who plan to release more of the records as they are reviewed and redacted to protect private information, said it was the largest public records request in the university's history.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story incorrectly reported the total included four law firms. It was actually three law firms and a public relations firm.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Roy Jones Oct 27, 2015
    user avatar

    Spending this amount trying to cover up academic fraud in the university system, this happens at at all universities. While at SNHS where Peppers attended with us he along with others was giving grades them so he could play sports in school we thought this was the norm, play sports get a free pass. Now I employee several people that graduated NCCU with a BS that hasn't got enough sense to pour it out of a bucket when asked how did you graduate they said we played ball

  • Sally Bethune Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


  • Brian White Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Technically, the money probably comes from Athletics revenues, but if it wasn't spent on this charade, it could have gone back to the general fund to be spent on student's educations.

  • Sally Bethune Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    Well who did pay it? The fired coaches? The Rams' club or more likely it came at a costs to the UNC students.

  • Ron Kemp Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    I have posted this before-- in my 27 years in the University system, I was told again and again that ALL monies handled and spent by the university are public funds, no matter what the source.

  • Norman Lewis Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    A State tax supported school, students getting State supported tuition grants/loans to attend school there and no State money was used to pay the multitude of lawyers and spin agents? How unaware do the school officials think we are?

  • Steve Clark Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    But the football team is 6-1, so it's finally paying off!

  • Charles Boyer Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    This raises a few interesting questions: where in the world is the NC Legislature, the supposed adults in the room that are supposed to safeguard taxpayer interests? Why have they not demanded answers -- and by that, the full, unvarnished truth?

    As it stands now, the state government's silence on this matter shows a near dereliction of duty.

  • Brian White Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    "how could an organization that's primary purpose is education and is supposed to empower students to be relevantly successful in their chosen major, to become successful members of society, completely lose that focus ?"

    I guess when most of the lawyers are UNC grads, UNC's just contributing to the success of their graduates by peeing away $7.5MM of public money into their pockets.

  • Thomas McDonald Oct 26, 2015
    user avatar

    First, how could an organization that's primary purpose is education and is supposed to empower students to be relevantly successful in their chosen major, to become successful members of society, completely lose that focus ?
    Second, imagine how student success might have been advanced if the school invested that 7.5 million dollars towards that objective rather than using it to positively spin the most horrific of crises?
    By their failures of advancing student success outcomes, they have lost the trust of the public and their students.
    Shame, shame, shame on you on losing sight as what your true purpose of existence is: advancing student success outcomes