Trump, on defense, blames media for Second Amendment flap

Posted August 10, 2016

— On the defensive once again, Donald Trump is blaming faulty interpretations and media bias for an uproar over his comments about the Second Amendment. He's insisting he never advocated violence against Hillary Clinton, even as undeterred Democrats pile on.

The latest controversy to strike Trump's campaign arose, as they often do, out of an offhand quip at a boisterous campaign rally. Claiming falsely that Clinton wants to revoke the right to gun ownership guaranteed in the Constitution's Second Amendment, Trump said there would be "nothing you can do," if she's elected, to stop her from stacking the Supreme Court with anti-gun justices.

Then he added ambiguously: "Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is — I don't know. But I'll tell you what: that will be a horrible day."

Was Trump suggesting gun owners take matters into their own hands if Clinton wins the White House? Or was he merely musing about the indisputably powerful influence of the gun lobby?

Like so many times before, Trump's supporters and opponents construed his comments in entirely different ways.

"Give me a break," Trump said hours later, insisting he was referring to the power that voters hold. He told Fox News that "there can be no other interpretation."

But Democrats saw — and seized — an opportunity to reinforce the perception that Trump can't moderate the things that come out of his mouth, much less the decisions he'd make as president.

"I really, frankly couldn't believe he said it," said Tim Kaine, the Democratic vice presidential nominee. "Nobody who is seeking a leadership position, especially the presidency, the leadership of the country, should do anything to countenance violence, and that's what he was saying."

By Tuesday evening, Clinton's campaign was fundraising off the firestorm, asking supporters by email to chip in $1 to "show that we don't tolerate this kind of politics in America." Trump's team, too, was using the controversy to reinforce a theme it's been pitching to voters: that an underdog Trump is being unfairly treated by the media.

"They will buy any line, any distortion, and spin that the Clintons put out," said former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, an ardent Trump supporter.

But House Speaker Paul Ryan, who was celebrating a primary victory in Wisconsin Tuesday night, said: "It sounds like just a joke gone bad. I hope they clear this up very quickly. You never joke about something like that."

The controversy immediately overwhelmed Trump's intended campaign-trail focus: the economic plan he unveiled just a day earlier and was promoting during rallies in the most competitive election states. It also underscored the concern, voiced by many worried Republicans, that he cannot stay disciplined and avoid inflammatory remarks that imperil not only his White House prospects but the re-election chances of many Republican lawmakers.

For Trump, the next opportunity to shift themes was to come Wednesday when he holds a pair of rallies in Abington, Virginia, and in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Clinton, fresh off her own campaign swing in Florida, planned to spend the day in the battleground state of Iowa, where she will tour a Des Moines T-shirt shop and hold a rally.

It wasn't immediately clear whether Trump's latest stumble would continue to dog him or whether, like many in the past, it would quickly fade away. In Ohio, a competitive state coveted by both candidates, Trump's comments struck some of those questioned in a focus group of voters the wrong way.

"Maybe I'm hearing it wrong, but sounds like he's basically saying take her out," said Julie B, an office administrator and married mother of two who was identified only by her first name and last initial.

Trump's perceived violation of political norms — candidates don't typically call for physically hurting opponents — was all the more striking because the position he was criticizing isn't one that Clinton holds. Contrary to Trump's remarks, Clinton has made support for the Second Amendment a key piece of her usual campaign speech, though she supports stricter gun control measures.

"I'm not here to take away your guns," she said in her Democratic National Convention speech. "I just don't want you to be shot by someone who shouldn't have a gun in the first place."

Trump did try to put one other simmering dispute to rest — at least temporarily. A day after Clinton committed to participating in all three scheduled debates, Trump said he, too, would do three debates, though he seemed to leave himself an out. Trump has complained previously that two debates are scheduled during NFL football games.

"I will absolutely do three debates," Trump told Time magazine. But, he added, "I have to see the conditions."


Associated Press writers Lisa Lerer, Catherine Lucey and Jill Colvin contributed to this report.


Reach Josh Lederman on Twitter at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Clarence Drumgoole Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    Any law abiding gun owner not outraged by what Trump said, don't deserve to be a gun owner. He make gun owners, look bad!

  • Ken Ackerman Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    I watched that speech. He meant what he said. It wasn't an off the cuff remark.

  • Skip Harris Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Look at their analysis on section 1 and 2 on link below.


    Of course liberals are more trusting of their news source than one that doesn't align with their views. The same is true of the few conservative news outlets. You are going to instinctively trust that which you are in agreement with, it is only natural.


  • Charles Phillips Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    remember when hillary said she wasn't dropping out of the primary in 2008 against obama because rfk was assisinated in june of the primary....yeah the media has very subtly forgot that nugget.

  • Robert Belknap Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    It doesn't really matter what Trump meant. It matters what he said.

  • Raleigh Rose Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Skip, do you have a link for the Pew Research about bias? I've looked and don't see anything. I did find some they did on trust, but nothing on bias yet.

    Not sure what you mean about PBS and NPR being trusted more because many of their liberal viewership. Are you saying liberals are more trusting of their news source? Because conservatives think anything from Fox is gospel, and that is not the case. Thanks!

  • Skip Harris Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Pew Research has a quite in-depth look at the bias of media outlets. It is interesting that almost all of them tilt somewhat or far to the left. PBS and NPR are rated high in "Trust" because their viewership skews very heavily liberal. The term trusted also is based on perception which is not a clear indicator of the presence of bias. All you have to do is look at time studies of subject matter at the major news organizations to understand the true nature and degree of their bias.

  • Cameron Horn Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    Where is the story about the Clinton foundation donors getting preferential treatment from the state department. Yep more emails that Hillary didn’t turn over

  • Raleigh Rose Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Fox News has been shown to be biased, just as MSNBC has, Fox from the right, MSNBC from the left and when listening or watching either that should be kept in mind. CNN does a pretty good job with being neutral most of the time. Yes, I know you won't believe that, but it's still true. Just because the news doesn't report what YOU want to hear or reflect your beliefs, doesn't mean it's biased. And if you want the most accurate and least biased news, try BBC, PBS and NPR. Those are the top three most trusted news sources.

  • Alex Wilson Aug 10, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Robert, so you are comfortable with someone calling for violence against you as a trump supporter. I'm sure you are comfortable with that truth.