Political News

Trump's DACA plan would pass hot potato to Congress

Posted September 4
Updated September 5

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump leave after attending services at St. John's Church in Washington, Sunday, Sept. 3, 2017. The president last week named today a National Day of Prayer for victims of Hurricane Harvey. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

— A plan President Donald Trump is expected to announce Tuesday for young immigrants brought to the country illegally as children was embraced by some top Republicans on Monday and denounced by others as the beginning of a "civil war" within the party.

The response was an immediate illustration of the potential battles ahead if Trump follows through with a plan that would hand a political hot potato to Republicans on the Hill who have a long history of dropping it.

Two people familiar with his decision making said Sunday that Trump was preparing to announce an end to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA program, but with a six-month delay intended to give Congress time to pass legislation that would address the status of the hundreds of thousands of immigrants covered by the program.

The move comes after a long and notably public deliberation. Despite campaigning as an immigration hard-liner, Trump has said he is sympathetic to the plight of the immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally as children and in some cases have no memories of the countries they were born in.

But such an approach — essentially kicking the can down the road and letting Congress deal with it— is fraught with uncertainty and political perils that amount, according to one vocal opponent, to "Republican suicide."

Still other Republicans say they are ready to take on a topic that has proven a non-starter and career-breaker for decades.

"If President Trump makes this decision we will work to find a legislative solution to their dilemma," said Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham.

Officials caution Trump's plan, set to be unveiled Tuesday, is not yet finalized, and the president, who has been grappling with the issue for months, has been known to change his mind at the last minute ahead of an announcement. It also remains unclear exactly how a six-month delay would work in practice, including whether the government would continue to process applications under the program, which has given nearly 800,000 young immigrants a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the country in the form of two-year, renewable permits.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and a handful of other Republicans urged Trump last week to hold off on scrapping DACA to give lawmakers time to come up with a legislative fix.

But Congress has repeatedly tried — and failed — to come together on immigration overhaul legislation, and it remains uncertain whether the House would succeed in passing anything on the divisive topic.

The House under Democratic control passed a Dream Act in 2010, but it died in the Senate. Since Republicans retook control of the House in late 2010, it has taken an increasingly hard line on immigration. House Republicans refused to act on the Senate's comprehensive immigration bill in 2013. Two years later, a GOP border security bill languished because of objections from conservatives.

Many House Republicans represent highly conservative districts, and if the president goes through with the six-month delay — creating a March deadline — the pressure is likely to be amplified as primary races intensify head of the 2018 midterm elections.

One cautionary tale: the primary upset of former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to a conservative challenger in 2014 in a campaign that cast him as soft on illegal immigration. That loss convinced many House Republicans that pro-immigrant stances could cost them politically.

The Obama administration created the DACA program in 2012 as a stopgap as they pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress. Many Republicans say they opposed the program on the grounds that it was executive overreach.

Legislation to legalize the so-called Dreamers has been lingering in Congress for years, with a handful of bills currently pending in the House and Senate.

The one that has received the most attention, introduced by Sens. Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., would grant permanent legal status to more than 1 million young people who arrived in the United States before they turned 18, passed security checks and met other criteria, including enrolling in college, joining the military or finding jobs.

It's unclear, however, whether the president would throw his support behind that or any other existing legislation. He could encourage the writing of a new bill — tied, perhaps, to funding for his promised border wall or other concessions like a reduction in legal immigration levels. But it's unclear how much political capital the president would want to put on the line given his base's strong opposition to illegal immigration, his campaign rhetoric blasting DACA as illegal "amnesty" and his reluctance to campaign hard for other priorities, like health care overhaul.

Graham said in a statement Monday that he would support the president if he decided ultimately to go through with the plan as outlined.

"I have always believed DACA was a presidential overreach. However, I equally understand the plight of the Dream Act kids who -- for all practical purposes -- know no country other than America," Graham said in a statement.

Sen. James Lankford, Republican of Oklahoma, agreed, saying that it should be up to Congress, not the White House, to set immigration policy.

"We must confront the nation's out-of-date immigration policy and finally resolve the issues of strong border enforcement and merit immigration," he said. "It is right for there to be consequences for those who intentionally entered this country illegally. However, we as Americans do not hold children legally accountable for the actions of their parents."

But Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican who believes that DACA is unconstitutional, warned that pushing the decision to Congress would be a big mistake.

"That would cause a great big civil war among the Republicans," he said last week. "We've got enough of never-Trumpers in Congress that are undermining the president's agenda."

"Ending DACA now gives chance 2 restore Rule of Law. Delaying so R Leadership can push Amnesty is Republican suicide," he added on Twitter late Sunday night.


Associated Press writers Catherine Lucey and Erica Werner contributed to this report.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Clarence Drumgoole Sep 4, 10:42 p.m.
    user avatar

    Isn't there more important business than messing with these kids? Obama can't be erased out of history. The man was the 44th POTUS.

  • Robin Cubbon Sep 4, 8:54 p.m.
    user avatar

    we used to be the melting pot, the shining city on a hill. perhaps we were never like that. if we are going to take immigrants then certainly these ones are the ones to take. clearly this country will always put money before morals but even in this case that is to 'our' benefit. this stubborness to punish people that were brought here as children as if they were guilty of high crimes is just overwrought. it is twisting the knife and says nothing positive about american values. i don't really think we have any values any more.

  • John Archer Sep 4, 5:53 p.m.
    user avatar

    Between Houston drowning, Irma looming, the western states engulfed in fire, and North Korea threatening, I'd say we're hanging on by a thread.

  • Ralph Savary Sep 4, 5:06 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Name ONE thing he's accomplished. Amuse me.

  • John Archer Sep 4, 1:36 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    I was not speaking for anyone, merely suggesting that not very many of "our people" would be admitted at all under TODAY'S rules. The kids DACA applies to are hardworking people, and follow the letter of all the rules laid out for them by our government. And yet, here we are, kicking them out. Why?

  • Hessian Diesel Sep 4, 1:13 p.m.
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Speak for yourself and yourself alone. My people went through Ellis Island and not all of them were admitted.

  • Hessian Diesel Sep 4, 1:11 p.m.
    user avatar

    I find it curious how nobody seems to want 'USA world police' but at the same time nobody seems to have a problem with 'USA world Motel 6/flop house/welfare slush fund.'

  • John Archer Sep 4, 11:36 a.m.
    user avatar

    People cannot see past the ends of their noses. These DACA recipients contribute billions of dollars to our economy. Not a single one of them has ever broken the law. Why do you want to get rid of them? What have they done to you personally that makes you hate them so much?

  • Jeffrey Derry Sep 4, 11:17 a.m.
    user avatar

    Good, it is not law #daca, come to this country legally, #illegals have one right in this country and that is the right to go home

  • Carrie Hurrelbrink Sep 4, 10:56 a.m.
    user avatar

    Trump is doing a great job for this Country! The liberals and democrats just cannot stand that they no longer can destroy things.