Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

4:57 a.m. • 5-23-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 74° F
  • Sat: Clear.
    • Hi: 72° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2010-08-04 17:48:00
Updated: 2010-08-04 18:59:22

Some state road projects lose out under new funding formula


Road Funding
Road Funding
print friendly

Removing politics from state road projects means that some projects have been dropped from North Carolina's priority list under a new funding formula.

The state Department of Transportation has identified the need for 1,100 road and bridge projects over the next decade. The projects cost an estimated $45 billion combined, but the DOT expects to have only $9 billion during that period.

So, officials have created a formula that scores each project based on factors like traffic congestion and the condition of the roadway to prioritize them. Traditionally, political influence played a role in what road projects were completed in different parts of the state.

"We have the statewide tier, which is interstates. We also a regional tier, which is typically North Carolina and U.S. routes, and the sub-regional, which is secondary roads," said Wally Bowman, division engineer for the DOT. "As you work your way down through those tiers, I think you'll see higher priority by us on some of the higher-level tiers, and you'll see a higher priority by some of the local folks on some of the lower-level tiers."

In the Triangle, some of the higher-ranked projects include work on Interstate 40 between the Interstate 440 Beltline and Johnston County, widening the Beltline from Wade Avenue to Walnut Street and building the so-called East End Connector in Durham.

Interstates 40, 85 and 95 also will get more money for maintenance, Bowman said, adding that local municipalities might have to pick up more of the cost for secondary roads.

"That doesn't mean we didn't rank some of the lower ones. We actually have Hillsborough Street at the Blue Ridge Road intersection – that needs to be an interchange with bridges going over – on our list, and it's funded in the current (priority list)," he said.

The DOT plans to spend a majority of its limited funding on existing roads rather than investing in new ones, Bowman said.


9 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
They can obtain the needed money quite easily. What they start doing is to put every nickel of taxes collected from the automotive community into the roads and bridges. This is a broad based tax center. Car dealers; repair shops; tire shops; parts stores; retail sales of automotive products in all other retail venues like department stores. Taxes on rental cars. Taxes on insurance companies that insure motor vehicles. They will have tons of money. We would not need a formula at all; just a schedule.

wade,

Uhhh, you do realize the state is split into 14 divisions for highway construction purposes, and each division gets roughly the same amount of money, right? So, if Division 10 (Charlotte and surrounding counties) spends its money on a couple of expensive interstate projects, well, they don't get more. Division 10 borrowed from other divisions to get I-485 started, now they are repaying that money, so they got what they wanted earlier.

Division 5 (Wake and surrounding counties) did the same thing to get our portion of I-540 built and I-440 widened, plus some other projects. That's one reason why the southern half of I-540 is going to be tolled; no more money available.

As for the unpaved dirt road, NCDOT requires property owners to donate the R/W to bring the road up to current standards. If even one refuses, the road isn't paved. Sorry about that.

I don't what the formula is, but in Durham County you can see (and feel) roads that are in desperate need for repairs or repave work. Meanwhile, others roads that seems in perfect or near perfect shape get repaved almost every year. I can mention some roads like TW Alexander and Miami Blvd (and the stretch of Miami Blvd between Alexander and Hwy 70), Fayetteville Road (near Woodcroft), etc. I am so curious to know Colonel Sander's formula for road constructions and repairs.

I can tell you how roads are funded in this state by this criteria:

1) If the project is in Wake, Durham, Orange, or Johnston county, it gets a higher priority 2) If the project is in Charlotte, Greensboro, or Winston-Salem, it gets a lower priority 3) If the project is in an eastern county without a city of about 50,000 people or more, it gets a higher priority. 4) All other counties, except those in #3 and #1 get a lower priority.

As proof, consider I-485 in Charlotte which is 20 years behind schedule. Consider Greene county. Pitt county has Greenville, so it is cheated on the road money. I was just in Greenville and the roads are still inadequate. But many other eastern NC counties with no minor city are doing great. The roads in Western NC are terrible. Unless you live in the privileged few counties, your county's project isn't a high priority.

I live in Greene County NC and every road leading into and out of our county has been REPAVED! It is crazy...as a state we have no money to pay teachers, state employess, LEOs but we can afford to hire people to hold up a STOP or SLOW sign, three men per truck and a whole other group of yahoos just standing around to fix some roads that did not need paving to begin with..it all stinks to high heaven to me...also would like to know how many of those sign holders are actually legal!

View Comments VIEW ALL 9 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times