Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

5:17 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Transportation panel agrees new taxes, fees needed


e-mail print friendly
Highway Traffic
Road Funding

North Carolina motorists should be prepared to pay more to drive on roads if the General Assembly approves higher taxes and new fees to help pay for the state's transportation needs.

The 21st Century Transportation Committee, which looked at road-building, bridge and public transit needs, met Wednesday to sign off on final recommendations to give state lawmakers when the Legislature reconvenes next month.

Among its recommendations is a requirement for motorists to pay a fee for the number of miles they travel in a year.

Other sources of revenue include increasing the highway-use tax from 3 percent to 4 percent on vehicle purchases, increasing vehicle registration fees and putting tolls on some of the state's major highways, including Interstates 77 and 95.

The state Department of Transportation faces a projected $65 million budget shortfall over the next 20 years.

State officials commissioned the blue-ribbon commission more than a year ago to look at new ways to help generate $10 billion over the next 10 years for transportation projects.

Committee member Chuck McGrady said, however, that the group failed to address how to ensure the revenue be used properly by the DOT, which has come under fire from some for being inefficient.

"We also needed to ensure that, if we could find increasing moneys to fund these transportation needs, that those funds would go into a system and into a department that could use the funding efficiently," McGrady said.

"And I think others looking at this report will really wonder why it was that we skirted that set of issues," McGrady added.

Stephen Jackson, a policy analyst with the North Carolina Justice Center's Budget and Tax Center, said the report failed to address the DOT's inefficiency and how to move forward with the plan.

"It was kind of marginalized," Jackson said. "It was very much business as usual. How can we just pour more money into the same old leaky bucket?"

The transportation advocacy group N.C. Go!, though, applauded the committee for its work, saying it has done "the heavy lifting" in creating a plan for funding reform.

"Now it is up to legislators to act upon the recommendations before our transportation system becomes a drag on an already struggling economy," said Marc Finlayson, co-chairman of the group.

Committee Chairman Brad Wilson said the group put forth its best effort on the report but ran out of time. The committee dissolves at the end of the month.

"Remember, the goal for this committee was to take a big first bite," he said.

Lawmakers on the committee, however, said it would be difficult to get new taxes and fees passed in a bad economic climate.

"We need to batten down the hatch and hold the ship on course, if we can, without doing anything innovative or out there that would result in increased revenues," Rep. Nelson Cole, D-Rockingham, said.

Cole said lawmakers can't put the burden on taxpayers during a recession. From a projects point of view, he said, the situation is frustrating.

The DOT has halted a number of projects because of the economy and a decrease in revenue. Spending on new projects has been cut from about $80 million a month to approximately $15 million to $20 million a month.

"The frustration, right now, is the funding process," he said. "We're in a funding dilemma now. That's a matter of fact, about to shut DOT down as a result of lack of funds."

RELATED TOPICS: Recession

e-mail print friendly

129 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 129 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Sorry drnc, doesn't take only 4 workers and two trucks to repair a decent sized pothole.

For equipment, you need an asphalt mixer to make it, a roller, a trailer for the roller, an air compressor for the jackhammer, and 3 trucks to pull them. For personnel, you need a couple flagmen, a couple equipment operators, and a couple shovel men. Shoveling 10 tons of asphalt a day gets heavy, and you really should have a couple more to do that much. So 3 trucks, 3 trailers, a roller, and 6-8 men to do the job right.

Easy solution. Spend less. Hire someone to tear the DOT budget apart and find some real savings. Run the department like you would run a business. Start by cutting the number of employees it takes to repair one pothole - 4 workers and two new trucks.

Take a look around at neighboring states gas tax. NC is a least double any other state already. Georgia has a 7.5 cents per gallon vs. NC 30.5 cents per gallon. What happens to all that extra gas tax money? How about giving jobs to the legal residents who pay taxes and remove those that pay none but get all of the same benefits. It's a shame to think that we just voted and put those responsible for this mess back in.

Doesn't the money from tickets (by law) go to the school system. So ticketing more wouldn't help highway funding.

The facts are on this website http://www.ncdot.org/about/finance/

NCDOT spends $1.5 Billion a year in TIP construction. AN EXTRA $2 BILLION IS NEEDED to keep up. It is well documented.

You simply cannot squeeze $2 Billion in savings out of $1.5 Billion. Complain about incompence, gas taxes, mismanagement, whatever, but the main fact is there's not enough $$$ coming in to keep up with transporation infrastructure.

Although there are some ideas on this message board that will help here and there, it is a small % of what is needed. The transfer from the trust fund to the general fund is only about 10% of what is needed. I don't see any of your suggestions adding up anywhere close to $2 BILLION.

Face the facts, either pay more transportation infrastructure, or don't complain when you are sitting in traffic.

View Comments VIEW ALL 129 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times

advertisement