Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:53 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

DOT to spend at least $300K to reroute I-40 in Greensboro


e-mail print friendly
DOT to spend at least $300K to reroute I-40 in Greensboro
DOT to spend at least $300K to reroute I-40 in Greensboro

The Department of Transportation is expected to spend at least an estimated $300,000 to $350,000 to reroute Interstate 40 in Greensboro back to its original location.

The DOT says the Greensboro Urban Loop, completed several years ago, was routed to comprise I-40, Interstate 73 and Interstate 85 because engineers thought it would be safer, quicker and less congested.

But motorists complained that the route is confusing (the old I-40 is not Interstate 40 Business), and residents living near the new I-40 complained of noise.

“We have reviewed this relocation plan with Greensboro’s Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and here internally,” said Transportation Division 7 Engineer Mike Mills. “We all agree that this plan will best address the future needs of the transportation system in and around Greensboro.”

The new plan consists of changing the green I-40 Business signs to blue I-40 signs, re-signing exits along I-40 and I-73 and rerouting U.S. Highway 421 to run with I-73 and parts of I-85.

The I-85 Business route and the I-85 exit signs will remain the same.

The cost to change the Greensboro signage is small in comparison with some other troubled DOT projects. A stretch of I-40 in Durham that had to be repaved because of crumbling pavement cost taxpayers close to $22 million.

And a two-mile stretch of Interstate 795 from Wilson to Goldsboro is expected to cost about $1 million to repair potholes.

Federal investigators were looking to see if the entire road needed work. That price tag could approach $7 million.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham

e-mail print friendly

23 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 23 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
changing signs isn't going to change the noise. Also these people must not have been paying attention in Kindergarden, where they teach you how to follow directions (signs)

Project priority lists aren't created by DOT; the city and county governments develop those "wish lists" and then prioritize them in order of the project they want done most. DOT then tries to find the funding for as many as possible and schedules them throughout the TIP. Those that aren't funded get put in the "future projects" list.

BTW, there were public notices made before I-40 was moved onto the I-73/85 route. This was 'in the works' years before it opened and had Federal approval. I'm wondering if the FHWA will accept putting I-40 back on a substandard, deficient route now that's it on a modern, well designed road.

I travel to the NC mountains quite a bit so I have used both routes. I like the urban loop better because of the wider lanes and less congestion. Like Nandud wrote you just have to take your time when you first use it to make sure you hit your exit. It's just like in Winston-Salem where you don't take the business route on I-40 unless you're going into the city. What's so confusing about that?

With that said I am no fan of the DOT. I think the confusion started because there were no announcements of the plans to reroute I-40 (or at least I didn't hear any). No they have to spend at least 300K to redo the signs! That is too typical. I've never seen an agency waste money as much as this one does. Did you hear about the wish list for the Raleigh area?

Moving I-40 was a good idea. Plans have been in place to reroute it for many years, and there are several valid reasons for this: 40 through Greensboro has improper medians, interchange spacing, and acceleration ramps in some areas. It also must carry a large amount of traffic from the western part of the state to the Triangle, Virginia, and other points North. Overall this creates a fairly dangerous stretch of road. To improve road conditions on old 40 to current design standards is prohibitively expensive. Thus, routing through traffic around Greensboro makes sense. The new route adds approximately 5 miles to the distance traveled. Local traffic can, and should use the old route. This segregation of traffic relieves overall road congestion. The new 40 is well designed and well signed. As long as one commits one's attention to driving, and not other things, it is not confusing. Public hearings were held on the routing; that was the proper time to raise concerns, not now.

I really like the new route. It only adds about 7 or 8 miles to my trips to the mountains, is just as fast if not a bit faster and is so much nicer and safer than having to drive through that one section in Greensboro with the split and all the on and off ramps. I don't think they should spend this money to switch the signs and anyone who doesn't like the new route can take the 40/85 business route.

View Comments VIEW ALL 23 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times

advertisement