Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:59 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Alert

  • Breaking News:  The UNC Board of Governors passed President Tom Ross' recommended tuition increase plan Friday for an average 8.8 percent hike in 2012-2013. The plan now goes before state lawmakers for approval.

Regional transit plan goes to Triangle leaders


e-mail print friendly
Mass Transit Could Help Ease Air Pollution
Mass Transit Could Help Ease Air Pollution

A citizen advisory group making recommendations for a multibillion-dollar regional transit system for the Triangle presented its final report to area leaders and transportation officials Wednesday.

But it comes with mixed reactions from community members, some of whom question whether the plan is right for the area at this time.

The Special Transit Advisory Commission has spent a year developing the proposed combination of buses, rail systems and "circulators" that, it says, is needed to help meet the area's growing transportation needs and to help the region compete for new industry and better jobs.

Among its key recommendations:

  • An enhanced bus network throughout the Triangle that includes express service to and from Raleigh-Durham International Airport and rush-hour-only bus service to outlying communities.
  • Rail service stretching 56 miles from Chapel Hill to north Raleigh, utilizing diesel rail cars and Light Rail Transit.
  • "Circulators" – initially buses and possibly later, streetcars or trolleys – operating in downtown areas and combined with a system of park-and-ride lots.

Fifty percent of funding for the system would come from local governments and 25 percent each from the state and federal governments. The local portion would come from a proposed half-cent sales-tax increase and a $10 increase in vehicle registration fees.

"Eventually, the pain will be too great, and you'll have to do it," said Joe Milazzo, executive director of the Regional Transportation Alliance, a proponent of the plan and the sales-tax increase.

"What this plan is trying to do is give us a compass heading in a way to get ahead of the problem," he added. "Right now, it makes all the sense in the world to try to connect this region together."

Others, however, oppose the plan, saying, for example, that light rail transit is too costly to justify the projected ridership.

"We don't live in that world where resources grow on trees," said Max Borders, a policy analyst with the Civitas Institute of North Carolina, which opposes the plan. "We have to prioritize, and the priority now really ought to be roads and buses."

Some Wake County commissioners who opposed a previous $800 million commuter-rail system, backed by the Triangle Transit Authority, said they are open to learning more about this proposal and how it would benefit the area.

The TTA scrapped its plan for the previous regional rail after the federal government, in 2005, rejected funding for it.

STAC said its proposal is better because it covers a broader area than the TTA's plan did and also has sufficient local funding.

"There has to be a local component," STAC co-chairman George Cianciolo said. "The federal and state authorities want to see that the local people are committed and believe in it and aren't just looking for a free ride."

It is now up to local metropolitan planning organizations, made up of local government representatives and transportation authorities, to integrate the proposal into their long-term transportation plans.

They must go before the Legislature to get a referendum for any sales-tax increase to get on the ballot, most likely in 2010.

If that happens, the regional transit system could be in place by 2035, when the region's estimated population would be about 2.5 million people.

STAC's final report was not publicly available Wednesday but was expected to be posted on the committee's Web site Thursday.

RELATED TOPICS: Triangle Transit, North Raleigh, Wake County, Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

52 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Americans are so spoil... I love it & I hate it!

bendal - you are quite firm in your stance... so much so one has to wonder why you are not open to other ideas. Please follow the contact link on the No Tolls on 540 website and I'd be glad to dialogue with you and try to understand why you feel "toll road or no road" is the only stance to have.

http://www.notollson540.org

By 2035 all of the RTP employers will be in China. There will be no need.

Those who want to copy Europe ought to consider why so many people left "wonderful" Europe for the US. Part of it was wide open spaces. But I guess some like living like rats in a too small cage.

Don't forget their value added tax either. Would you be willing to pay an extra 20% (compounded by each step the item takes getting to market) on everything?

Of course STAC considers roads to be part of transit; what do you think their expanded bus lines are going to run on, dirt paths?

And all you "no toll on NC 540" people, you've got two choices; build the road sooner with tolls and decide if you'll drive on it or use I-40, or build it a decade or so later with gas tax funding. Raising license fees isn't going to get enough money, and the state gas tax would have to go up more than a "tiny bit" as your website claims, to pay for the estimated $800 million pricetag. It may not be "fair" that the lower, less used and less needed portion will need a toll, but it's reality.

http://www.notollson540.org wants you all to realize, if STAC gets their higher taxes and higher annual vehicle fees to raise money for rail and bus, you will ALSO have to pay tolls to drive parts of 540. While No Tolls on 540 supports STAC's idea for rail in the Triangle's future, we do NOT support it without a completed toll free I-540 loop.

Why not have STAC's plan include helping us build the I-540 loop toll free? Well, STAC doesn't consider roads part of a transit system, yet roads are. Also, local transportation issues are not in communication with NC transportation decisions in the Legislature.

Result?? If the NC Legislature approves toll roads AND STAC's plan is approved by the local CAMPO and DCHMPO, we are doomed to be screwed with a DOUBLE WHAMMY. Triangle residents will be stuck with HIGHER TAXES, HIGHER VEHICLE FEES AND TOLLS ... all at the same time.

http://www.notollson540.org

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times

advertisement