Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

12:01 a.m. • 5-22-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2008-03-17 13:19:00
Updated: 2008-04-30 18:12:47

Poll: N.C. residents want mass transit, not expense


Capital Area Transit Bus
Capital Area Transit Bus
print friendly

Public transportation ranked behind only gas prices among the most pressing transportation issue in North Carolina, according to an Elon University survey of 473 state residents last week.

The poll also found that people have a favorable impression of the state Department of Transportation, which has been criticized in recent months by a state audit and a private consultant.

The poll has a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.

Seventeen percent of respondents listed public transportation as the most important, compared with 31 percent for gas prices, 13 percent for road conditions and 10 percent for traffic congestion.

Almost 72 percent said they support commuter rail systems in urban areas, and about 70 percent said they would like high-speed rail service between major cities. Two-thirds of those surveyed said they would be willing to pay extra fees – some would go as high as $100 or more a year – for such services.

But when it came to figuring out how to pay for transit or more road construction and maintenance, residents didn't like most of the funding ideas, according to the poll.

Fifty-eight percent rejected raising car registration fees, 68 percent opposed fees based on miles driven per year, 63 percent said they wouldn't like to pay more for driver's licenses, 63 percent also rejected making some highways toll roads, 81 percent opposed using local property taxes – or a state-levied property tax – for transportation, and 70 percent didn't like the gas tax.

The transportation funding ideas that garnered the most support in the poll were a $2 billion statewide bond referendum for road construction and maintenance (65 percent), imposing impact fees on developers (59 percent), charging trucking firms according to the weight of their rigs (59 percent) and giving voters the option of approving a half-cent local sales tax for transit and road projects (58 percent).

A majority of those surveyed said they would consider using transportation alternatives like carpools, vanpools, buses and trains, but most said they don't do so now because the services aren't available where they live.

The survey also gauged the public perception of the DOT, which has come under fire in recent months. A state audit said poor planning led to expensive delays in highway construction projects, and a private consultant found a lack of accountability and low morale in the department.

Yet, three-fifths of those polled said they were satisfied with the DOT's performance. Most of those who reported interacting with the department in the past year said DOT employees were courteous and helpful.

The highest negatives for the DOT were 45 percent who said they weren't satisfied with road maintenance, 42 percent who weren't satisfied with DOT's provisions for public transportation and 40 percent who weren't satisfied with road construction.


52 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
There is a region of people (geographic, disabled, and economic) that tend to be dependent on the public transit system. For others it's a cheap convenient means to get around without causing wear on the car.

You need to try to balance the books as close to level as you can for the funding alloted, the small amount of income from riders, with the operating cost. Is there that much demand in the outer sections that are not served? And will ridership hold on those routes? Only way to know is to run a trial run (6-9 month max time) to see. If ridership doesn't hold, cut the new route.

Metro shortened a route I had used to get to the north side. We then had to foot it over a mile or two reaching the same pickup spot for our ride to the house.

Usually long runs were Peak AM and PM times (rush hours) out to the burbs. You had to pay extra on those, but it was the only time that service was available in most cases to reach those areas.

you people need to get jobs near where you live. Quit buying house 40 miles away from your office so you jam up the roads with your wasteful commutes. You work in the Park - buy a house in the park...foetine

Do you honestly believe everyone can live where they work. My job is moving and the homes are in the 240's and my house is no where near that and my kids go to a good school that I like in our area. That was not a very intelligent statement that you made. Not everyone can live near where they work.

Mass transit is the only way you are going to see some easing of the overcrowding on our local highways. The more and more people that move here the more cars we have and the longer commute times will get. Mass transit wouldn't be feasible for a totally private venture because it would be almost impossible for them to secure the land to build the rail system. A public/private partnership might work. If we rely on the existing rail tracks to run our commuter rail we will end up in the same boat as Amtrak. An under funded often behind schedule rail system. Can you imagine trying to ride a commuter train and having to wait for a frieght train to lumber along in front of the train you are on? the problem with toll roads is they want to put toll roads on the southern part of 540 only. We built the northern part for the rich and now they don't want to help build the southern part. If the politicians would keep their hands out of the transportation fund we might be ok.

We don't need mass transit so people can live in one town and work in another.

Take a look next time at our buses. Mostly empty and costing us millions to run. Take a look at most school buses, mostly empty and costing us millions to run. See a pattern.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times