Raleigh, N.C. — As the Triangle grows, traffic grows, and so grows air pollution.
Currently, the area does not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's standards for air quality.
"Our air pollution problems don't come from factories, they primarily come from cars," said John Hodges-Copple, the planning director for the Triangle J Council of Governments, the regional planning group for Wake, Durham, Orange and surrounding counties. "So, whatever we do, transportation-wise, that will have the long-term effect."
Studies indicate that during the heaviest commute times in the Triangle, nine out of 10 vehicles have one person on board.
Trains and buses could help take cars and pollution off the road, but the Triangle Transit Authority's commuter rail plan was put on hold after the federal government declined to help fund it.
And, buses carry only 5 percent of Triangle commuters.
"I'm not going to pretend that any particular rail system or bus system will be the be-all and the end-all for air quality in the Triangle, but every little bit's going to help," Hodges-Copple said. "And I think that most people realize transit is going to play an important role in that broader equation"
If the Triangle is not in compliance by 2009, the federal government could withhold funds for future projects.
A regional Blue Ribbon panel appointed to create mass transit solutions meets to discuss the issue on Thursday.
Mass transit could help ease air pollution
- Reporter: Mark Roberts
- Photographer: Terry Cantrell
- Web Editor: Kelly Gardner
RELATED TOPICS: Triangle J Council of Governments, Triangle Transit, Durham
Copyright 2011 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
77 Comments
Save Money On Your Energy Bill - togetherwesave.com
Travel NC By Train: Click for Daily Schedules!
Bundle & Save! Get free delivery of a PODS® container - See how
advertisement



WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
low ridership not readership
September 26, 2007 2:38 p.m.
September 26, 2007 2:04 p.m.
September 26, 2007 12:06 p.m.
September 25, 2007 8:14 p.m.
The issue is we are not hard against LRT, we are against tax dollars going down the drain. Most LRT routes are for say 10-15 miles. The City NeXT has to plan for potential expantion (spokes) of the LRT and they learn they are fighting against property owners who do not want the line in their back yard.
The root question again becomes why install a transportation system that will operate in the negative on the financial side, and ridership will be low most of the time.
Best places to either start or end it are Malls, or Airports. Then if there is a large residential downtown region thats another place to serve (a line) knowing that the airport line won't serve it. However you need to decide if you want a end to end system or a spoke based for the Rail and busses so commuters can easially transfer.
It depends on the current transit system.
September 25, 2007 6:51 p.m.