Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

5:00 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

New 'N.C. 540' Likely to Open for RTP Access Next Week


e-mail print friendly
New Highway Set to Open Near RTP
New Highway Set to Open Near RTP

The newest section of Interstate 540 loop is expected to open by late next week, highway engineers said Thursday – but not by that name.

Contractors have been working on the $102 million, 4.5-mile stretch of highway since February 2004. Stretching south from I-40 to N.C. 55, the road will go by the handle "N.C. 540."

The North Carolina Turnpike Authority asked the state Department of Transportation not to call the new section an "interstate" because they hope to open the proposed Triangle Expressway in a few years as a toll road. The toll road would overlap N.C. 540 between N.C. 54 and N.C. 55.

Area drivers said they were eagerly awaiting the new section of N.C. 540, which is expected to alleviate some morning congestion on I-40. Tens of thousands of cars now squeeze into one lane on I-540 every morning in order to enter I-40.

"It happens all the time. It's very frustrating, very frustrating. Hopefully, they'll have it all resolved very soon," driver Karen Bigler said.

The new highway will have interchanges at N.C. 54, Davis Drive and N.C. 55, creating three more ways for motorists to access Research Triangle Park without mixing with traffic on I-40.

DOT engineers were conducting a final inspection of the new highway Thursday morning, including measuring the height of guardrails and ensuring reflectors were properly glued into the pavement.

"We (will) generate a list for the contractor to complete the final items on the project," DOT engineer Phillip Johnson said. "It's looking real good. We've got some things to do, some minor cleanup, some drainage issues, but nothing major."

Engineers said they expect to open the highway between Thursday and Saturday of next week.

RELATED TOPICS: Research Triangle

e-mail print friendly

81 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 81 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Transp. Eng: I think you missunderstood me a bit on where collected toll money goes. If roads such as I95, I77 or even I85 were tolled at the borders to let through traffic pay for those roads, great, they could very well become self sufficient. This means funding that the NCDOT would have originally budgeted for those roads can now be put to other projects since the toll money is taking care of those roads. Plus, US Code Title 23 Section 129 says you can't use toll revenue on other roads if tolling agreements are reached with the Feds (which would be required for tolling an already existing Interstate, so if there were tolls on 95/77/85, those tolls would have to be used on those roads only. :)

go panthers, $10 per resident is way low to avoid tolls. You would have to collect over $1000 per Wake County resident to pay for Western Wake.$800,000,000/786,522 (2006 Wake Co. pop.)= over $1000/person.

turnpike420, I don't know what the toll folks have studied.

I would support tolling an existing road, like I-95, for the improvement/widening of that road only (I-95 needs to be widened to 8 lanes for $4B).

However, I would not support tolling a road and sending those toll monies to other areas of the state. Should the folks that live in NC and travel to VA to work using I-95 have their toll $$ sent to Raleigh or Charlotte? On the flip side, should the tolls of 540 be sent to another area of the state? I know there would be a lot of opposition of diverting tolls to other areas of the state. Rural areas sending money to urban areas? I just don't see it happening politically. Tolling out of state residents always seems attractive.

I don't like the 540 name change either.

turnpike420, I have a small SUV. My point is that as cars become more and more fuel efficient, there are less gas taxes rolling in to make up for inflation. A Hybrid going 60 miles per gallon takes up practically as much place on the road as a Hummer getting 10 mpg. Who pays more in gas taxes to go the same distance?

I have no problem with your suggestion of using fines like Virginia. However how are you going to get around the local school system lobby? From the court of appeals: http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2006/050571-1.htm The school systems effectively shut down the red light camera program recently in North Carolina by demanding 90% of the fines. Cities such as High Point would have lost money running the cameras and giving the school system 90% of the fine. You would have to change the law that says 90% of all fines must go to the school system, and with as powerful as the school folks are in this state, I just don't see it happening.

Transp. Eng: careful, I drive a Hybrid SUV, I get 30 mpg, granted those Suburban drivers who get 14-18 are your target, don't stereotype all SUVs.

I represent No Tolls on 540 http://www.notollson540.org and you want alternatives to raise money? OK. Let's look to our northern neighbor Virginia: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-29-Va-new-driving-laws_N.htm They are going to levy LARGE civil fees and penalties to people who break traffic laws. Let the speeders and drunk drivers pick up the tab. Side effect, safer roads due to more people deciding to drive safe than pay. Also, why hasn't the NCTA looked into tolling I95, I77, I85 at the borders with VA and SC? The impact is small, only to those who live and work on opposite sides of the border. Let through traffic pay for those roads, why? If tolls pays for those roads, then other funding can be directed at local projects, such as 540, 840, 140, 285, 485, 785, 274, etc. Also, the I540 name change to NC540 is absurd!

I'd like to correct my error in my earlier post. $800,000,000 (not $800,000) is needed for Western Wake the last I heard.

Boy, I wish it were only $800,000.....

View Comments VIEW ALL 81 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times

advertisement