Morrisville, N.C. — The newest section of Interstate 540 loop is expected to open by late next week, highway engineers said Thursday – but not by that name.
Contractors have been working on the $102 million, 4.5-mile stretch of highway since February 2004. Stretching south from I-40 to N.C. 55, the road will go by the handle "N.C. 540."
The North Carolina Turnpike Authority asked the state Department of Transportation not to call the new section an "interstate" because they hope to open the proposed Triangle Expressway in a few years as a toll road. The toll road would overlap N.C. 540 between N.C. 54 and N.C. 55.
Area drivers said they were eagerly awaiting the new section of N.C. 540, which is expected to alleviate some morning congestion on I-40. Tens of thousands of cars now squeeze into one lane on I-540 every morning in order to enter I-40.
"It happens all the time. It's very frustrating, very frustrating. Hopefully, they'll have it all resolved very soon," driver Karen Bigler said.
The new highway will have interchanges at N.C. 54, Davis Drive and N.C. 55, creating three more ways for motorists to access Research Triangle Park without mixing with traffic on I-40.
DOT engineers were conducting a final inspection of the new highway Thursday morning, including measuring the height of guardrails and ensuring reflectors were properly glued into the pavement.
"We (will) generate a list for the contractor to complete the final items on the project," DOT engineer Phillip Johnson said. "It's looking real good. We've got some things to do, some minor cleanup, some drainage issues, but nothing major."
Engineers said they expect to open the highway between Thursday and Saturday of next week.



WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments.
July 8, 2007 3:42 p.m.
turnpike420, I don't know what the toll folks have studied.
I would support tolling an existing road, like I-95, for the improvement/widening of that road only (I-95 needs to be widened to 8 lanes for $4B).
However, I would not support tolling a road and sending those toll monies to other areas of the state. Should the folks that live in NC and travel to VA to work using I-95 have their toll $$ sent to Raleigh or Charlotte? On the flip side, should the tolls of 540 be sent to another area of the state? I know there would be a lot of opposition of diverting tolls to other areas of the state. Rural areas sending money to urban areas? I just don't see it happening politically. Tolling out of state residents always seems attractive.
I don't like the 540 name change either.
July 7, 2007 7:52 p.m.
I have no problem with your suggestion of using fines like Virginia. However how are you going to get around the local school system lobby? From the court of appeals: http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2006/050571-1.htm The school systems effectively shut down the red light camera program recently in North Carolina by demanding 90% of the fines. Cities such as High Point would have lost money running the cameras and giving the school system 90% of the fine. You would have to change the law that says 90% of all fines must go to the school system, and with as powerful as the school folks are in this state, I just don't see it happening.
July 7, 2007 5:59 p.m.
I represent No Tolls on 540 http://www.notollson540.org and you want alternatives to raise money? OK. Let's look to our northern neighbor Virginia: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-29-Va-new-driving-laws_N.htm They are going to levy LARGE civil fees and penalties to people who break traffic laws. Let the speeders and drunk drivers pick up the tab. Side effect, safer roads due to more people deciding to drive safe than pay. Also, why hasn't the NCTA looked into tolling I95, I77, I85 at the borders with VA and SC? The impact is small, only to those who live and work on opposite sides of the border. Let through traffic pay for those roads, why? If tolls pays for those roads, then other funding can be directed at local projects, such as 540, 840, 140, 285, 485, 785, 274, etc. Also, the I540 name change to NC540 is absurd!
July 7, 2007 11:46 a.m.
Boy, I wish it were only $800,000.....
July 6, 2007 9:00 p.m.