Durham, N.C. — Dozens of Durham property owners are weighing their options as the state moves ahead with plans to build a long-awaited highway, known as the East End Connector, right on top of their properties.
Improving travel versus taking private land is the trade-off of every major road project, and the state Department of Transportation will soon start the difficult process of buying the land or taking it by eminent domain.
The nearly $200 million project will have eight lanes to connect N.C. Highway 147 and U.S. Highway 70. The connector and related widening will tie in Interstate 85 from the north to Interstate 40 and beyond. It will also ease heavy truck traffic on downtown Durham streets.
If land acquisition goes as planned, East End Connector construction is set to begin in about two years.
“This is the last missing link that ties all this together with each other and with I-85. It's a critical link for our freeway system. We need it for our future,” said Joe Milazzo, with the Regional Transportation Alliance. “It's been the top priority of the City of Durham, Durham County, Durham Metro Planners (and) the Durham Chamber.”
The progress comes at a price. Just south of East End Avenue is Durham's Hayestown community. More than 150 parcels of land will be impacted by the connector. Twenty-one homes and 15 businesses must go.
Rev. Sylvester Williams said he believes nothing good can come from the project.
“These are places where African-Americans have historically lived in the city of Durham. They're all being displaced,” he said.
Jim Lindsley, who owns a waterproofing business, will see a third of his property shaved off by an expanded cloverleaf right-of-way. He says he wishes the DOT would have considered alternative ideas.
“I don't have a problem with the greater good,” Lindsley said. “My biggest concern is that they're not going to make an offer that will enable us to make the transition.”
DOT engineer Wally Bowman says property owners are impacted with every major road project and that he can’t “make everybody 100 percent happy.”
“We’re trying to do the best we can,” he said, urging property owners to be patient.
“We can't settle with everybody at the same time,” he said. “We're going to offer you what the fair market of what your property is today.”
The North Carolina Eminent Domain Law Firm is holding an informational meeting on property owner rights at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Downtown Durham Marriott. The DOT is holding another meeting next Tuesday from 4 to 7 p.m. at Orange Grove Mission Church.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
You assume that because a bunch of robed shysters say something, that it automatically becomes moral.
These people have signed no agreement in which they have given any state or government the right to take their property away. Elections are irrelevant. "Democracy" does not give one the right to commit an act of aggression upon another person.
September 24, 2012 2:43 p.m.
September 24, 2012 9:43 a.m.
True but the market value of any one bit of land is in reality what someone is willing to pay for it and what someone is willing to sell it for......in reality that is an unknown for most property. So they guess and from time to time revise that guess. Its not a reliable measure of the value of any one piece of land.
September 21, 2012 3:01 p.m.
Well actually it does if they have the power to enforce it. The laws were written by properly elected officials, the fact that you don't agree is irrelevent. The Supreme court does agree.
"Man has a natural right to own property. This right extends from the natural right of self-determination and self-ownership."
Where does it say that? and where does it say you have the right to own a specific property?
" Without self-ownership, man is unable to exercise his human nature to expand, grow, develop, and think. Any aggression on his property is immoral, regardless of how any other people you think it benefits."
Where do you get this nonsense from?
"If a group of people wish to build a new highway, then they need to negotiate with the property owners to come to a voluntary deal."
You can leave voluntarily or forcibly the result is the same.
September 21, 2012 2:57 p.m.
September 21, 2012 12:36 p.m.