Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

9:32 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-09-20 16:22:00
Updated: 2012-09-20 20:05:26

New highway threatens to displace Durham property owners


East End Connector
East End Connector
print friendly

Dozens of Durham property owners are weighing their options as the state moves ahead with plans to build a long-awaited highway, known as the East End Connector, right on top of their properties.

Improving travel versus taking private land is the trade-off of every major road project, and the state Department of Transportation will soon start the difficult process of buying the land or taking it by eminent domain.

The nearly $200 million project will have eight lanes to connect N.C. Highway 147 and U.S. Highway 70. The connector and related widening will tie in Interstate 85 from the north to Interstate 40 and beyond. It will also ease heavy truck traffic on downtown Durham streets.

If land acquisition goes as planned, East End Connector construction is set to begin in about two years.

“This is the last missing link that ties all this together with each other and with I-85. It's a critical link for our freeway system. We need it for our future,” said Joe Milazzo, with the Regional Transportation Alliance. “It's been the top priority of the City of Durham, Durham County, Durham Metro Planners (and) the Durham Chamber.”

The progress comes at a price. Just south of East End Avenue is Durham's Hayestown community. More than 150 parcels of land will be impacted by the connector. Twenty-one homes and 15 businesses must go.

Rev. Sylvester Williams said he believes nothing good can come from the project.

“These are places where African-Americans have historically lived in the city of Durham. They're all being displaced,” he said.

Jim Lindsley, who owns a waterproofing business, will see a third of his property shaved off by an expanded cloverleaf right-of-way. He says he wishes the DOT would have considered alternative ideas.

“I don't have a problem with the greater good,” Lindsley said. “My biggest concern is that they're not going to make an offer that will enable us to make the transition.”

DOT engineer Wally Bowman says property owners are impacted with every major road project and that he can’t “make everybody 100 percent happy.”

“We’re trying to do the best we can,” he said, urging property owners to be patient.

“We can't settle with everybody at the same time,” he said. “We're going to offer you what the fair market of what your property is today.”

The North Carolina Eminent Domain Law Firm is holding an informational meeting on property owner rights at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Downtown Durham Marriott. The DOT is holding another meeting next Tuesday from 4 to 7 p.m. at Orange Grove Mission Church.

East End Connector


47 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 47 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
"Well actually it does if they have the power to enforce it. The laws were written by properly elected officials, the fact that you don't agree is irrelevent. The Supreme court does agree."

You assume that because a bunch of robed shysters say something, that it automatically becomes moral.

These people have signed no agreement in which they have given any state or government the right to take their property away. Elections are irrelevant. "Democracy" does not give one the right to commit an act of aggression upon another person.

If they didnt have people living there and needing the road they wouldnt have to build it. Just where do you think they going to build a road if they dont have to buy land and relocate people. We like new roads to get us quickly to work but then we dont want them to impact us. It is that feeling that I dont care about you but please leave me alone. If they build a road people and business are going to be affected. It is that simple so get over it. I dont like paying taxes when over 60% is spent on eduction and we dont have children. We are paying to educate your children. We dont think things are fair when they affect us but it is ok if it affects other people.

"Property tax value is mandated by law to be the fair market value."

True but the market value of any one bit of land is in reality what someone is willing to pay for it and what someone is willing to sell it for......in reality that is an unknown for most property. So they guess and from time to time revise that guess. Its not a reliable measure of the value of any one piece of land.

"What law? Simply because a gang of criminal thieves have written down some words on a piece of paper and called it law does not make it so."

Well actually it does if they have the power to enforce it. The laws were written by properly elected officials, the fact that you don't agree is irrelevent. The Supreme court does agree.

"Man has a natural right to own property. This right extends from the natural right of self-determination and self-ownership."

Where does it say that? and where does it say you have the right to own a specific property?

" Without self-ownership, man is unable to exercise his human nature to expand, grow, develop, and think. Any aggression on his property is immoral, regardless of how any other people you think it benefits."

Where do you get this nonsense from?

"If a group of people wish to build a new highway, then they need to negotiate with the property owners to come to a voluntary deal."

You can leave voluntarily or forcibly the result is the same.

Property tax value is mandated by law to be the fair market value. County tax appraisers are charged with this mandate to derive a fair market value to be assessed for all property in their respective counties. I agree with eminent domain and the right for public taking for absolutely essential public needs but full market value should be paid when it is utilized plus damages, if any, to remaining property. The State is often driven by non meritoriouis factors such as the pot of right of way acquisition money is low so they try to stretch it by sticking it to the property owners. The government reps talk out of both sides of their mouths.

View Comments VIEW ALL 47 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times