Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

12:50 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2011-09-26 17:24:00
Updated: 2011-09-27 05:31:15

NC unsure of following Virginia's lead in tolling I-95


Interstate 95 sign
Interstate 95 sign
print friendly

While Virginia has received permission to charge tolls on Interstate 95 to help fund transportation projects, North Carolina officials say they haven't made up their mind on whether to follow suit.

The Federal Highway Administration a week ago gave Virginia preliminary approval for I-95 tolls. Virginia Department of Transportation officials said tolls could generate $50 million a year for expanding the highway, repaving and improving road safety.

North Carolina has also applied for federal permission to toll I-95. Consultants are finishing up a two-year study of the highway in North Carolina, and state officials could make recommendations by the end of the year.

"We need to keep that corridor vibrant," North Carolina Transportation Secretary Gene Conti said Monday. "Main Street of the East Coast is what I like to call it. We need to make sure it's up to modern standards and can support the traffic it now carries."

I-95 is the state's deadliest highway. Most of it remains four lanes wide – the same width as when it was built decades ago – and it doesn't meet modern safety standards.

Conti said no decision has been made yet on tolls, but he said the state has to find some way to cover the estimated $5 billion to $6 billion repair bill for I-95 over the next 20 years.

"We don't have the money to pay for that right now, so we're trying to look at all the alternatives to figure out how to it," he said.

Drivers weren't too pleased with the prospect of paying to use I-95, which covers more than 1,900 miles and passes through 16 states. 

"There's so much traffic, and it would back traffic up for miles and miles and miles. I just don't think it would work," said Bill McGuire, a resident of Rhode Island, which also is looking at tolling I-95.

States should budget for road work instead of imposing tolls, McGuire said.

Don Christman, who is from Nebraska, also panned the idea of tolls, but quickly added that I-95 needs work.

"It needs to be done, I guess. I don't want to be driving over bumps and potholes," Christman said.

A.P. Pascaran, who was on his way home to Delaware, said he is used to paying tolls for highway maintenance and wouldn't have a problem if North Carolina imposed them.

"If they can keep the roads well maintained, I have no problem with that, as long as it's not $10 every 10 miles," Pascaran said.

There's no word yet how much the tolls on I-95 could cost if North Carolina adopted them. Similar highways in other states average around 10 to 20 cents per mile.

If tolls are approved, Conti said, they probably wouldn't start for a couple of years.


100 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 100 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
"Add to that the traffic that would use the secondary roads to avoid the toll roads and the backups, not just to save some money, and you add to an already dangerous situation."

I doubt people would take secondary roads to avoid tolls when traveling long distances. When my family travels we just pay the toll so we can get on to our destination. Maybe it will be the same for most others.

if they are even contemplating it then it's inevitable (unless there's a law on the books preventing it)...I thought I heard somewhere that in NC only new roads could be tolled, not existing....so I'm a bit confused....must have misinterpreted something?

frosty: I think most new tolls are collected automatically via transponders to minimize any traffic congestion at the toll sites.

Absolutely a bad idea. As the article mentioned, the back ups at the toll booths would be horrendous. Add to that the traffic that would use the secondary roads to avoid the toll roads and the backups, not just to save some money, and you add to an already dangerous situation. And it causes traffic problems not just at the toll booths but all along the highway as faster and slower traffic sort themselves out again. I remember not just the Richmond toll road but I-95 in Connecticut. The were STUPID. Any politician or bureaucrat who puts forth such and idea should be immediately fired or voted out of office.

How did Georgia and Florida manage to widen their portion of I-95 without resorting to tolls? I remember when Virginia had 4-5 .25c tollbooths on I-95 going through Richmond. Talk about traffic jams!! The road would widen to 6 lanes or so to provide access to the tollbooths, and then quickly neck back down to two lanes shortly after leaving the booth. With the attitudes of drivers these days I predict a large number of wrecks associated with traffic piling up trying to get through the proposed tollbooths. If this proposal is put into effect, plan on adding an hour to your future travel times when driving north through Virginia and North Carolina on I-95.

View Comments VIEW ALL 100 COMMENTS

Triangle Drive Times