Today @NCCapitol (May 29): Senate takes on budget; House debates 'fracking'

Posted May 29, 2014


— Good morning and welcome to Today @NCCapitol for Thursday, May 29. Here's what's going on at the General Assembly and elsewhere in state government: 

BUDGET: Members of the state Senate will spend the day reviewing their $21 billion state budget plan, details of which were posted online late Wednesday night:

Senators used a news conference Wednesday to tout a plan that would boost teacher salaries by 11 percent on average. At the time, they refused to say how they paid for that bump. The documents posted Wednesday night show roughly half of the $468 million needed comes from cutting teaching assistant positions dedicated to early-grade classrooms. The TA budget is cut by $233.1 million, or roughly half.

The Senate budget gives the governor the power to appoint the head of the State Bureau of Investigation, currently the prerogative of the independently elected Attorney General. It also moves the State Crime Lab to the Department of Public Safety, an agency overseen by Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, rather than Attorney General Roy Cooper, a Democrat. 

This move drew immediate criticism from Cooper.

"For 75 years, an independent SBI has without bias rooted out corruption in the executive and legislative branches. With this move, the legislature protects itself and the governor at the expense of government integrity and ignores North Carolina law enforcement's opposition," he said in an email late Wednesday.

SENATE SCHEDULE: The Senate is scheduled to come into session at 8 a.m. to begin moving the budget from one committee to another. Senators won't meet for their floor session, during which they are expected to sign off on a tax and regulatory reform bill, until later in the day. No firm time was announced for that session. We do know:

  • The Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to review the budget bill starting at 8:30 a.m.
  • The Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to review the budget at 1 p.m. 
  • The Senate Pensions and Retirement Committee will review the budget after the close of the Finance Committee. 

This schedule would allow the Senate to complete work on the budget and send it to the state House this week. 

TAX and DEREGULATE: When the Senate does meet in floor session – stay tuned to the @NCCapitol Twitter feed for updates – they are set to sign off on a package of changes to last year's sweeping tax reform measure. The most controversial of the changes involves paring back this year how cities may impose business privilege license taxes and then allowing the privilege license to expire on July 1, 2015. 

Top House and Senate budget writers have worked closely on the bill, with Rep. Julia Howard, R-Davie, and Rep. David Lewis, R-Harnett, attending the Senate Finance Committee that vetted the bill. House tax writers say they are happy enough with the Senate's work on the bill that they will vote to send it to the governor as is. 

"We will vote to concur," Howard said Wednesday. That vote could come as soon as Thursday afternoon, she said.

The state Senate is also expected to approve a sweeping regulatory reform measure. It has already given the plan a tentative nod, but disagreement among Republicans sparked a 90-minute closed door meeting Wednesday. However, Senate Rules Chairman Tom Apodaca, R-Henderson, said he hoped the chamber would vote to send the measure to the House Thursday afternoon.

House Speaker Thom Tillis Tillis discusses vote on, speed of 'fracking' bill THE HOUSE: The state House is scheduled to meet at 1 p.m. The most pressing item on its schedule, other than a possible tax vote, is finishing work on a bill that critics say would put North Carolina on the fast track to allowing drilling for natural gas. In particular, the measure would clear the way for companies to apply for drilling permits in 2015 and provides a mechanism to lift a moratorium on the hydraulic fracturing process, or "fracking," before the state's Mining and Energy Commission has fully adopted rules governing the process. 

The measure passed through committee and onto the floor in the state House Wednesday will little public notice. But House Speaker Thom Tillis said the issue has been debated for a long time.

"I think it's just a matter of why not get it done?" Tillis said, noting that the legislature has been working on the issue since 2011. "It's been several years; it's just time to move forward."

WRAL.com plans to carry the House Session live. Check the Video Central box on the homepage. 

ALSO ON THE SCHEDULE: The General Assembly publishes a full list of committee meetings online. Here's what @NCCapitol is keeping an eye on: 

House Environment (10 a.m. | LOB 544): The committee is scheduled to take up a measure that environmental advocates say would severely curb wetland protections. A similar measure stalled at the end of the 2013 session. UPDATE: A committee notice issued at about 9:30 a.m. removed this wetlands bill from the calendar. 
The Governor (10 a.m.): McCrory is expect to attend the Governor's Statewide Impaired Driving Task Force Meeting at the Department of Transportation at 10 a.m.
House Homeland and Veterans Affairs (Noon | 421 LB): The committee is scheduled to take up a bill adjusting the qualifications for the top leader of the North Carolina National Guard. 

LEGISLATOR PAY: A bill filed last week that would more than double the pay of most North Carolina legislators is likely to languish in the House this session, but proponents say raising lawmakers’ salaries would ensure the General Assembly reflects the diversity of the state. “It dramatically affects who is able to serve in the legislature,” said North Carolina State University political science professor Steve Greene. “The super-low pay we have means it’s people who can afford to go to the legislature for several months in a year. It stacks the demographics of the legislature in a very particular way.”

CLOSED DOORS: Among public bodies in the state, the North Carolina General Assembly is unique. Members of the Republican and Democratic caucuses are allowed, by law, to gather behind closed doors to discuss matters of policy and work out how the group will approach floor debate on a bill. For every other public body in the state – from town councils to boards of county commissioners and gubernatorially appointed panels – any gathering of more than half its members to discuss policy and information must be open to the public. Legislators, by contrast, can gather enough of their members to decide the outcome of legislation away from the press and the public.

READING: Senate leaders are backing a bill that will allow schools more flexibility in implementing the Read to Achieve law. The 2012 law requires 36 tests to assess whether third-graders are up to grade level in reading comprehension. Those who are not, according to the law, must either attend a six-week reading camp over the summer or repeat the third grade.

Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger championed the legislation, saying too many children are being promoted despite weak reading skills, putting them at risk of falling further behind as they move through school. Studies show many students with reading difficulties drop out of high school. However, since its implementation, teachers, parents and school administrators have complained that the law is overly strict and requires too much testing – three tests for each of 12 reading standards, all administered in the second half of the school year.

U.S. SENATE: U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan spent much of the primary season on the defensive, as both Republican candidates and outside groups attacked her for her support of the Affordable Care Act. That changed Tuesday night, when Hagan teed off on her November challenger during a stop in Raleigh.

Speaking at the annual Green Tie Awards dinner of the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters, Hagan criticized Tillis on the issue of climate change and the "special interest agenda" he has advanced in the legislature.


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Whatthehey May 29, 2014

    To not even allow passage of amendments that would go as far as all other fracked-up states is despicable, e.g. to not disclose what toxic chemicals are put in our common water supplies, to not require reimbursement to homeowners for damage done to their SURFACE property by the frackers, to ruin billions of gallons of water for eternity as much of the country and state faces droughts - I certainly hope anyone whose family is hurt by these callous greedy politicians remember them and make the chickens come home to the politicians' own roosts as much as it will to the residents of the fractured counties. Never forget.

  • Forthe Newssite May 29, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    ding, ding, ding!!!!

  • May 29, 2014

    Rucho is in the gas/oil corps pocket. ALEC has taken control of our state. Pope is pope. There was never going to be any debate about this. Rucho comes from the north where fracking has been going on a while and fully well knows the dangers, he's simply bought and paid for. The rest, if they DON'T know what's going on, then they are simply too unintelligent to be representing the people of this state. But greed will win out every time. Enough money will grease the wheels for any amount of damage a company wishes to impose upon our state.

  • Terry Watts May 29, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Why do we have to potentially poison our water to get unemployment down? Are you admitting that the GOP GA's plan to attract business to NC is a failure???

    MEP: "$$$ > your health"

  • monami May 29, 2014

    "...provides a mechanism to lift a moratorium on the hydraulic fracturing process, or "fracking," before the state's Mining and Energy Commission has fully adopted rules governing the process."

    BASS AKWARDS! The debate is a sham. It's a foregone conclusion and this non-subtle slam dunk by this set of elected officials is despicable. They're bent on making a buck at the expense of the people and environment of this state. Shameful.

  • icdumbpeople May 29, 2014

    It is coming... like it or not.

  • Benjamin Wright May 29, 2014
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Really Mep? Have you even visited the EPA web site? The have several on going investigations into pollution and have already mysteriously cut short some other investigations. Wait perhaps it isn't so mysterious give the way the Republicans have spent decades trying to gut and eliminate EPA.

  • Benjamin Wright May 29, 2014
    user avatar

    just like the conservatives hate water you can drink, air you can safely breath, and any animal with more cells than a just conceived fetus and less cells than an adult job creator.

    Like not being able to eat the fish out of Lake Crabtree and large portions of Crabtree creek? Just wait till the fracking pollution gets into the water supply.

  • pinehorse May 29, 2014

    It will be a misdemeanor to disclose what chemicals are being pumped into the ground that will directly affect the adjoining landowners' groundwater for years to come. Pure genius. Who needs clean water anyway?