Today @NCCapitol (June 28): Tax troubles and tantrums
A long week at the legislature ended in fits of pique as Senate leaders expressed frustration with the slow pace of negotiations over taxes and budget and House lawmakers expressed frustration with each other.
Posted — Updated"We need to get things moving on tax reform and the budget," said Sen. Tom Apodaca, R-Henderson, the chamber's Rules Chairman who called for the move. "I wouldn't call it gamesmanship. I would call it incentive."
"It's kind of difficult to negotiate with three bodies rather than two," he said, implying that input from McCrory's office was less than helpful.
Asked about Apodaca's swipe at the governor's office, Lewis said, "I don't see them as a hindrance...We're trying to all stay united and get to the same place."
As for the Senate clearing House bills off the calendar, Lewis was philosophical.
"This is a very old institution," he said. "And there are very old political tricks, and we'll continue to to do all of this stuff long after Sen. Apodaca and I are gone."
Lewis hazarded a guess that Senate bills would be pulled from the House calendar on Thursday, which would have given both side more free time to negotiate.
That House didn't pull Senate bills but did pull some ...
In fact, debate ran so long that some members missed long-scheduled plans. Rep. Rick Glazier, D-Cumberland, blew off his own campaign fundraiser to stick around for the afternoon.
The provision was slipped into the bill at 2:30 p.m. on Thursday and raised the hackles of several lawmakers, even though Rep. Tim Moore, the House Rules chairman, said he knew of no opposition.
"The reason he doesn't know of any controversy is because nobody knew this bill was on the table," said Rep. Darren Jackson, D-Wake.
As the bill was pilloried on the House floor, Moore withdrew it for "technical" reasons and referred it to the House Judiciary Committee.
But the chambers wasn't done doing legislative back flips.
That wide margin held until someone noticed the bill dealt with a July 1 deadline. House lawmakers are not expected to be in town for full sessions next week. And the bill is a "roll call" bill, meaning it needs to be voted upon on two separate days in each chamber.
House members spent 15 minutes trying to figure out when they might meet – at 12:15 a.m. Friday morning or closer to 9 a.m. – to handle the bill.
Then a flurry of members, apparently worried about everything from the measure breaking their no tax pledge to the influence of "Agenda 21" on the bill, changed their votes to "no" on the bill. That raised the specter of the bill potentially failing its early morning vote.
Rep. John Blust then moved to reconsider the bill – essentially withdrawing and erasing the initial yes vote.
At that point, it looked as if lawmakers moved down the bill for a number of reasons, not the least of which having to do with nobody want to return for a midnight session.
Then Rep. Julia Howard, R-Davie, stood up to lecture her fellow lawmakers.
The bill, she said, had been on the calendar earlier in the week, but because of gamesmanship between the House and the Senate, had been shuffled around. Delaying approval of the bill, past the July 1 deadline, would cost local taxpayers money but would be better than canning the bill entirely. She pointed out that the measure originated in the Senate and that the late-week parliamentary back flips came "as we're sitting here trying to negotiate the budget with the Senate, as we sitting here trying to do tax reform with the Senate."
Howard said the bill and the Senate should not be used as "fodder" over legislative arguments.
"If it's more important to you to go home tonight, then we'll just bring it back. I'm going to ask you not to kill it. That's not a cute thing to do, it's not an honorable thing to do," Howard said.
Her please won the day and the measure was sent back to committee where it could be fitted with new effective-date language.
Meanwhile, the Senate had planned to return to work Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Senators had anticipated taking up a sweeping package of voter ID legislation and election reform proposals. But that was before the House announced it was taking a week off. It's unclear if that will change the Senate's plans.
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.