@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Today @NCCapitol (Feb. 26): Medicaid expansion bill is back from conference, fracking bill in the Senate

Posted February 26, 2013

— Good morning, and welcome to Today @NCCapitol for Tuesday, Feb. 26. This is WRAL's roundup of what you need to know about North Carolina state government this morning.

UP EARLY: Gov. Pat McCrory is scheduled to be on Fox & Friends at 7:15 a.m. this morning. 

MEDICAID BILL: Senate Bill 4, which turns down the expansion of Medicaid funding under the Affordable Care Act, is back from its conference committee and scheduled to be heard on both the House and Senate floors today. The bill also prohibits state agencies from helping to set up the federal health chances called for under the federal law, sometimes called Obamacare. 

Both Sen. Tom Apodaca, R-Henderson, and Rep. Justin Burr, R-Stanly, who were members of the conference committee said Monday the changes to the bill were "mainly technical." Those "technical" changes appear to clarify the Department of Health and Human Services can continue to use federal funding to build NC FAST, a computer system meant to channel needing families into benefit programs. The new version of the bill also appears to let the Department of Insurance to continue oversight of health insurance plans offered in North Carolina, even if they're offered on an exchange. 

The bill had overwhelming support from House and Senate Republicans on its first trip through the General Assembly. Democrats have been pointing out that other GOP governors have been accepting the Medicaid expansion funding. 

Worth noting: The bill now has a fiscal note attached. Although the bill itself anticipates only spending $5 million in state funding, the fiscal note allows for spending as much as $45.7 million. That appears to be a hedge against the federal government not agreeing to swap grants for the NC FAST system. 

SENATE SESSION: The Senate will meet at 2 p.m. In addition to the Medicaid bill, the Senate is scheduled to:

HOUSE SESSION: The House will meet at 2 p.m. In addition to the Medicaid expansion bill, House lawmakers will take up a resolution celebrating the 10th anniversary of the effort to bring North Carolina's copy of the Bill of Rights back to the state. 

Medicaid paperwork Lawmakers expected to approve bill blocking Medicaid expansion EDUCATORS: The House will bring educators to Raleigh this week to meet with lawmakers about education policy. House Speaker Thom Tillis told reporters Monday that he didn't expect any revelations from the conversations, saying the object was to start a dialog. 

Tillis will meet with superintendents across the state from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. today. WRAL.com will carry this session live. Check the Video Central box on our home page.

SEQUESTER: The loss of federal funds under sequestration would mean cuts to programs for military children, technical education and students with disabilities, State Superintendent of Public Instruction June Atkinson told WRAL Monday.

"It's so frustrating to me that one of the most important aspects of what government does, which is to promote public education, is put in jeopardy," Atkinson said.

During his news conference, Tillis said there would be no additional state funding in this year's budget to make up for the loss of money under the federal sequester. 

COMMITTEES: For a full list of committee hearings, check the @NCCapitol home page. Among the notable committee meetings happening today:

  • House Education (10 a.m.): The committee takes up a bill to allow lottery funds to be used for digital learning, a priority Gov. Pat McCrory mentioned in his State of the State address. 
     
  • House Health and Human Services (10 a.m.): The committee has two bill. One, which would required better monitoring of newborns for problems resulting from heart defects, should be relatively non-controversial. 

    But a bill that would keep those under age 18 from using tanning beds will likely be the subject of controversy. Last week's meeting ended with industry officials disputing information from medical professionals about artificial tanning's link to skin cancer. Today's meeting is expected to continue that push and pull.  House takes up teen tanning ban House takes up teen tanning ban

EXPOSURE: House Bill 34, the bill clarifying that women can be charged with indecent exposure for showing their breasts in public, has once again been sent back to the House Rules Committee. The bill cleared the committee last week. This marks the second time the measure has been sent back to committee from the House floor. 

"That's something my Rules Chairman would have decided," said House Speaker Thom Tillis, saying he didn't know why the measure had been returned. 

Rep. Tim Moffitt, R-Buncombe, said he wanted to make sure the groundwork had been laid for the bill.

"I want to make sure the Senate will take it up," he said Monday night. "We just want to make sure we have smooth sailing before we bring it to the floor."

Others around the legislative building are forecasting choppy waters for the measure, observing that it rarely portends well for a measure to be sent back from the floor twice. There also seems to be some sentiment among some Republicans that spending so much time on a bill dealing with the exposure bill is making them look like, well, a bunch of boobs. 

TAPPING THE BREAKS: Two high profile bills that initially appeared to be ready to move quickly are not on committee calendars this week.

A bill to scrap vehicle safety inspections was due to be heard in House Transportation this week. That meeting was canceled Monday night. Rep. William Brawley, R-Mecklenburg, said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Julia Howard, R-Davie, wanted more time to work on the bill. 

Sen. Jerry Tillman, R-Randolph, said his bill to bring payday lending back to the state would likely not be heard this week. "I've got a (proposed committee substitute) that I'm perfecting," Tillman said. The new draft of the bill isn't ready yet, he said. 

PAYDAY POLLS: Groups on either side of the payday lending issue rolled out dueling polls on Monday. 

The North Carolina Justice Center touted a survey that showed "nearly three-fourths of North Carolinians say they would be less likely to vote for a legislator that supported the bill." 

Meanwhile, payday lender Advance America sent out the results of its own poll which show 75% of NC voters believe that the state should allow lending companies that meet state and federal regulations to compete to provide more market choices for consumers."

Each poll was flawed in its own way, asking questions designed to elicit the answers desired from respondents. And besides, lawmakers would never make decisions based on what polls well, would they? 

ABORTION: Sen. Warren Daniel, R-Burke, and several other GOP senators filed a SB 132, which would adjust the state's health education curriculum. Under the bill, students would be told that having an abortion is a significant contributor to pre-term birth in future pregnancies. The measure appears to be based, at least in part, on a 2012 Finnish study, but is likely to be controversial. 

WAKE COUNTY: Wake County Commissioners met with members of Wake County's legislative delegation today, according to Sen. Josh Stein, D-Wake. There was particular attention given to a plan that would transfer control of property from the school system to the county and rearrange how educators are elected. Stein said members of the Wake County School Board will meet with the delegation next Monday at 4 p.m. and likely bring a different perspective as to what should be done. 

BLUEPRINT: In the latest turn of the screw of the Blueprint NC story, North Carolina Republican Party Chairman Robin Hayes is calling for the State Board of Elections and IRS to investigate the nonprofit linked to a controversial political strategy memo. 

REDISTRICTING: "Attorneys for those who challenged North Carolina's boundaries for General Assembly and congressional seats began making arguments over the heart of the litigation Monday, accusing out-of-state mapmakers of creating lines that diminished the influence of black voters," reports Gary D. Robertson of the Associated Press. A second day of hearings will be held today. 

ELSEWHERE: In other news:

Wilmington Star News: "A bill to give New Hanover beach towns the power to enforce smoking bans on the beaches has hit a ‘snag,’ according to one local lawmaker."

North Carolina Health News: "When the owners of several adult care homes walked away from their duties, there was little recourse for local or state officials who wanted to prosecute or punish the owners for abandoning dozens of residents. And the system has been designed that way."

PROFILING: The American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina says emails obtained through a federal public records law show that the federal government was considering a plan that would encourage racial profiling in an effort to meet what the ACLU calls quotas to deport illegal immigrants.

FIELD TRIP: Gov. Pat McCrory  issued this statement about his weekend trip to Washington, D.C.: 


"In North Carolina, we are making tough decisions and setting clear priorities to fix our economy and make government more efficient and effective. We ask our leaders in Washington D.C. to do the same.

"During my trip, I spoke with the President and administration officials about three areas of major concern for North Carolina. First was sequestration. I urged the President and Congress to use responsible budgeting based on priorities, not across-the-board cuts. Second was offshore energy exploration. After a decade of sitting on the sidelines, North Carolina stands ready to partner with other states to contribute to this nation's energy independence and create thousands of jobs. Lastly, I met with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to discuss health care issues and the impact of federal health care legislation on North Carolina.

"As governor, I will continue to be an advocate for North Carolina in our nation's capital on issues that will have an impact on the future of our state."


17 Comments

This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • lavenderdejectedmoon Feb 26, 2013

    "They" ARE the government. Did you mean NC? Then if NC says no to the expansion, the feds can't force it on us.

    The federal government will step in.If the states decide to Opt-Out of Medicaid expansion, ObamaCare itself will have to step up to the plate and insure these individuals via the ObamaCare Health Exchanges. The problem is that this will likely raise everyone's health insurance, including those with private insurance.

    This means that anti-ObamaCare states who reject Medicaid will not only hurt their poorest, it will affect every tax paying American and every American who has health insurance. Again, Obama Care is here to stay. Either get with the program now or have other states pay for our care.

  • Terkel Feb 26, 2013

    "If they don't expand Medicaid, the government will do it."

    "They" ARE the government. Did you mean NC? Then if NC says no to the expansion, the feds can't force it on us.

  • junkmail5 Feb 26, 2013

    But why should the state take the money, the responsibility, all the headaches plus employee cost. I- ykm

    Because the cost is being paid ANYWAY by the NC taxpayers via federal taxes.

    So all you're doing is refusing to take money and refusing to let a bunch of people get insurance that have none.

    You don't get to opt out of the federal taxes funding it.

  • Terkel Feb 26, 2013

    NC_Interest, do those other states have the 5th highest UE rate in the country? No? Do the math yourself.

  • ykm Feb 26, 2013

    NC my concern is not the value of the money. And true the federal government will print what's needed and some. But why should the state take the money, the responsibility, all the headaches plus employee cost. It's a federal program let the folks who can print do so and pay the entire cost.

  • benhansen74 Feb 26, 2013

    When many other states with republican governors are gladly accepting the money so that more of their citizens will have access to healthcare, our esteemed GA members are lining up to get on the bandwagon to turn the money down!! How in the world did these people get elected?????

  • downtowner Feb 26, 2013

    Simple question: If payday lending is such a great idea, why are National Banks baned from participating in payday lending by the OCC? National Banks cannot do payday lending, that is a fact. It is predatory lending at its worst. They want to put those individuals that can least affort it in to a cycle of debt. Stopping individuals from getting multiple loans is not the point, it is the 435% interest rate that is so horrible.

  • 12345_here Feb 26, 2013

    ykm: The federal government used to print thousands, then hundreds of thousands, then millions, then billions, then trillions. Eventually it will print quadrillions. The Government makes the money and the market determines the value.

    Do not turn away the cash just because you don't understand where it comes from. The market will take care of it's value.

  • lavenderdejectedmoon Feb 26, 2013

    You do realize that Obama Care is here to stay? If they don't expand Medicaid, the government will do it. Guess who pays for North Carolina's health care. The rest of the country. So all of those that cry about the takers and freeloaders, will become one themselves.

  • junkmail5 Feb 26, 2013

    I dont see how a group that is against the lottery can be for payday lending.
    NCMom1

    Gambling bad. "bankers" good. It's the republican way!

    Where does the federal money come from? Whats the projected cost to the state?- YKM

    Kind of irrelevant honestly. The feds will tax residents of every state to fund their share of medicare, including NC.

    So refusing the medicare thing, even when the fed contribution drops to 90%, means you're turning away 90% of the money you helped provide, to no benefit.

    So the choice ends up being:

    Let all your residents pay for the 90% fed portion, and then refused to take the money they contributed to and leave all the poor without any healthcare at all... saving only the 10%

    Or pay the 10% and you get the other 90% AND healthcare for lots of low income residents.

    The second choice is clearly better, as many other republican governors have already concluded. Ours seem especially bad at math though.

More...