Raleigh, N.C. — One day before the General Assembly returns to work, House Speaker Thom Tillis on Tuesday spelled out his chamber's goals for the 2013 session in one word – reform.
Tillis promised lawmakers would rewrite the state tax code, "move very aggressively" on regulatory reform and work with school superintendents on "meaningful education reform."
While some top Republicans in the state Senate are backing a plan that would eliminate the personal and corporate income tax in favor of a higher sales tax rate that is applied to food and services in addition to other goods purchased, Tillis said he was keeping his options open. The state needs to move cautiously to ensure one complex tax system isn't replaced with another, he said.
"When you move to a consumption-based system, it could potentially be as complex, at the end of the day, as the current system we have," he said.
Tillis has appointed a special committee to identify state regulations that are "out of step with best practices" and set up a plan to repeal them by the summer of 2014. The one-year sunset provisions would give people a year to review each regulation and backers a chance to argue why a particular rule should remain in place.
"We're not just talking about regulations that affect business but that affect all individuals and their interactions with government," he said.
He didn't elaborate on any educational reforms he wants to see, saying only that he's talked with local superintendents who have applied to operate charter schools so they can experiment with different teaching models.
"We need an environment that encourages innovation and promotes flexibility," he said.
Other issues facing the House this year, Tillis said, include approving the two-year state budget, passing legislation requiring voters to present photo identification at the polls and repaying the $2.4 billion owed to the federal government for unemployment benefits paid out during the recession.
The House plans to move "quickly and efficiently" on its agenda, he said, adding that he hopes to pass the budget "in record time" and possibly adjourn by the end of May. The General Assembly has been known to work well into July in years past.
The budget shouldn't be as much as a problem as in 2011 because the state is in much better financial shape now. Also, he said to laughs from fellow lawmakers and reporters, he hopes that the General Assembly won't have to face a budget veto from Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, as they did with Democratic former Gov. Beverly Perdue.
Tillis said he's in favor of overhauling the state unemployment benefits system by July 1, even if that means that some long-term unemployed workers could lose their federal jobless benefits.
Lawmakers have proposed cutting the maximum weekly benefit paid by the state from $535 to $350 and limiting the number of weeks people can receive state benefits. Any changes to the state program this year, however, would end long-term federal benefits under the deal Congress worked out to avoid the so-called "fiscal cliff."
"Unemployment was never intended to to this long-term, almost kind of entitlement, program. It was intended to be a bridge to help people as they go back to work," he said, adding that clearing the state's debt to the federal government will help recruit new businesses that won't be on the hook for the unemployment bill.
House Minority Leader Larry Hall said Democrats would work with the Republican majority on "things that make sense," adding that "some of this doesn't add up."
“Saying we need regulation for puppy mills at the same time you’re saying we shouldn’t have regulations on education is an interesting way to posit it,” said Hall, D-Durham.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/business/2013/05/06/12417151/2457a21a00d94324b6fc448c8ec173d0-Photo-1-100x70.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
I hate 0bamacare too.
January 29, 2013 3:53 p.m.
BINGO!
January 29, 2013 3:54 p.m.
January 29, 2013 3:54 p.m.
We still do and republicans have dominated the government the last two years if you want to go down that road. But of course, you leave that part out.
January 29, 2013 3:55 p.m.
Conservatives don't. It's a kind of reverse robin hood ideology. Blame everything bad on the poor and middle class, constantly call them "takers" or the 47%, and insist they pay more so that the rich can pay less in taxes.
January 29, 2013 3:58 p.m.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lord have mercy! Tell me you are being sarcastic!
Not that NC isn't fixin to give TX and MS a run for their money. :(
January 29, 2013 4:00 p.m.
Democratic House candidated received about a million more votes than the Republicans did. The Republicans remained in power only because they drew the maps of the gerrymandered districts.
January 29, 2013 4:01 p.m.
January 29, 2013 4:03 p.m.
I'll bite. Scratch the surface and you'll see the tax burden shift away from the rich and onto the poor... Is that the common sense you mean? That it's a bad idea?
January 29, 2013 4:06 p.m.
When has everyone paying higher taxes become the mantra for the right? We already have a sales tax that illegals and tourists pay. Just because someone doesn't agree with you is no reason to call them ignorant. I am well informed of the plan and I am good at math. I have never taken a handout from the government (aside from tax deductions) and I don't really care there are people out there that make tons more money than I do. Why do the wealthy cry class warfare whenever their already very low taxes are even considered for increase. I also agree with Art Pope which s
January 29, 2013 4:08 p.m.
January 29, 2013 4:10 p.m.
January 29, 2013 4:10 p.m.
Not fair to who? The person that paid ten times as much to the government? Even if the person making $100K paid a 89% rate and the person making $10K paid nothing, the person making $100K would still have more left over. Is that still unfair to you?
January 29, 2013 4:10 p.m.
January 29, 2013 4:12 p.m.
And who forces employees to do the job? Nobody. If the market decides the rate is too low for the job required, the employer will be forced to raise the rate.
January 29, 2013 4:12 p.m.
Yeah, because Texas is doing so terribly with their budget SURPLUS.
January 29, 2013 4:21 p.m.
January 29, 2013 4:26 p.m.
Yeah, because Texas is doing so terribly with their budget SURPLUS. sonicbluezx3
You forgot to mention... Texas has lower unemployment, and a tax surplus..... AND NO STATE INCOME TAX!
Sales taxes are FAIR TAXES. Regardless of your income, your race, your creed, your religion, or even your dogs name... you pay the same as everyone else. The more you buy, the more you pay. People are suppose to be EQUAL in the eyes of the law... and taxes are made through law. Taxes fund govt operations, not act as some form of wealth redistribution or social justice system.
January 29, 2013 4:32 p.m.
Half of their revenue comes from Federal Funds.
January 29, 2013 4:50 p.m.
No it isn't Thom. Taxed on what you consume instead of taxing one for producing. Not difficult at all. If it doesn't cover all the expenses however, perhaps you should look at cutting spending as well
January 29, 2013 4:59 p.m.
They also pay in the form of 6% cash taken out of their paychecks every single month.
January 29, 2013 5:02 p.m.
""let's see what happens as we follow Alabama, Texas, and Mississippi down the rabbit hole of republican rule.""
Yeah maybe we should follow California instead and work on bankruptcy proceedings one city at a time. This State is in bad fiscal shape. It is my hope that this changes. It is my hope to see significant spending cuts and a significant downsizing in the number of State Employees. I also hope they are not DUMB enough to expand Medicaid. In fact, they ought to see if there is a way to turn that PROGRAM back to the Feds where it belongs.
January 29, 2013 5:08 p.m.
What are the benefits? HIGH TAXES and lousy roads?
January 29, 2013 5:11 p.m.
Sorry but none of that is correct any longer.
January 29, 2013 5:19 p.m.
Yes, with a couple of the Dem governors either in prison or indited, it was quite a "run". LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! A Bev fan if I ever heard one....
January 29, 2013 5:22 p.m.
Higher income taxes equal less take home pay. So which side of the spectrum is the best to take from. Some worry the wealthy will pay less. I suggest stop worrying about them and consider your own place on the economic ladder. Do the math. Cause the tax system/structure is going to change.
January 29, 2013 5:24 p.m.
Who are you to decide what someone "needs". Why should someone that has been financially successful be responsible to make up for your failure?
The arrogant leftists always feel they know what is "fair", and what everyone deserves, and "needs". Amazing the hypocracy...
January 29, 2013 5:28 p.m.
Or, as many have done, hire illegal laborers at a lower rate. The market for labor is actively manipulated by the unscrupulous.
January 29, 2013 5:30 p.m.
January 29, 2013 5:45 p.m.
January 29, 2013 5:58 p.m.
January 29, 2013 6:04 p.m.
January 29, 2013 6:05 p.m.
Elaborate on this, please. What type of high-priced items are you talking about? What couldn't anyone who was disciplined enough to save up the money necessary to buy one of these items take advantage of going across the state line? I am as middle-class as they come and I customarily save up enough money to buy a new car in cash. I would classify that as a high-priced item. If I find a better deal, I go across the state line. Of course, with cars, one has to pay the applicable tax in the home state. So my example is not a good one except for being a high-priced item.
I would expect poor people living on the state lines cross those lines for groceries and services such as hair cuts.
January 29, 2013 6:19 p.m.
January 29, 2013 6:56 p.m.
January 29, 2013 7:24 p.m.
January 29, 2013 7:24 p.m.
January 29, 2013 7:26 p.m.
THIS!
January 29, 2013 7:28 p.m.
Conservatives don't. It's a kind of reverse robin hood ideology. Blame everything bad on the poor and middle class, constantly call them "takers" or the 47%, and insist they pay more so that the rich can pay less in taxes. Plenty Coups Spoken like a true liberal!
January 29, 2013 7:28 p.m.
Is that supposed to be an actual argument? A label?
January 29, 2013 7:35 p.m.
Is that supposed to be an actual argument? A label? Plenty Coups .....Both, just telling someone else what to do with there money and lives...
January 29, 2013 7:48 p.m.
Why not?
January 29, 2013 9:55 p.m.
Income taxes are reasonable. They don't have to be complex. Just tax at a given percent and be done with it. The income tax Ida's actually the most reasonable tax. If you make money, you pay a percentage to the government. If no salary, no tax.
January 29, 2013 11:55 p.m.
In a state, truly unrivaled for beauty from Carolina Beach to the Blue Ridge, please find a balance between compassion for the less fortunate and those to whom much has been given. I think there's an applicable verse in one of the many spiritual traditions.
Faux Paws
PS: Ummmm...anybody notice that there haven't been many (if any?) Hispanic posters? If anybody has a digital camera available for photo ID...
The times, they are a'changin'!
January 29, 2013 11:58 p.m.
hey when you make voter id a major biggie-- that tells me all i need to know about the incompetance of the new adminastration.-- MEET THE NEW BOSS HE'S AS SLACK AS THE OLD BOSS.....
January 30, 2013 8:32 a.m.
January 30, 2013 10:04 a.m.
Exactly, but is sounds so much better when placing the attack on the "so called rich". Because they never ever pay their fair share. It is so unfair.
January 30, 2013 10:13 a.m.
No different than liberals blaming everything bad on the upper class. So we have two extremes and not enough middle of the road sensible people to put an end to the senseless bickering. So we all lose.
January 30, 2013 10:18 a.m.
Some liberals do blame the rich. That's true. But i don't understand people from the middle class agreeing with "their party" (or team) that they should pay more so that the rich can pay less. Is it that important that your side wins so that you end up voting against your best interests? With a progressive tax system, the rich can and do pay a bit more of a percentage and still have plenty of income left for luxury.
January 30, 2013 12:16 p.m.