Tillis vows reform in tax code, state rules, schools

Posted January 29, 2013

— One day before the General Assembly returns to work, House Speaker Thom Tillis on Tuesday spelled out his chamber's goals for the 2013 session in one word – reform.

Tillis promised lawmakers would rewrite the state tax code, "move very aggressively" on regulatory reform and work with school superintendents on "meaningful education reform."

While some top Republicans in the state Senate are backing a plan that would eliminate the personal and corporate income tax in favor of a higher sales tax rate that is applied to food and services in addition to other goods purchased, Tillis said he was keeping his options open. The state needs to move cautiously to ensure one complex tax system isn't replaced with another, he said.

"When you move to a consumption-based system, it could potentially be as complex, at the end of the day, as the current system we have," he said.

Tillis has appointed a special committee to identify state regulations that are "out of step with best practices" and set up a plan to repeal them by the summer of 2014. The one-year sunset provisions would give people a year to review each regulation and backers a chance to argue why a particular rule should remain in place.

"We're not just talking about regulations that affect business but that affect all individuals and their interactions with government," he said.

He didn't elaborate on any educational reforms he wants to see, saying only that he's talked with local superintendents who have applied to operate charter schools so they can experiment with different teaching models.

"We need an environment that encourages innovation and promotes flexibility," he said.

North Carolina Legislature Building (4x3) Sweeping changes planned by Republican legislative leaders

Other issues facing the House this year, Tillis said, include approving the two-year state budget, passing legislation requiring voters to present photo identification at the polls and repaying the $2.4 billion owed to the federal government for unemployment benefits paid out during the recession.

The House plans to move "quickly and efficiently" on its agenda, he said, adding that he hopes to pass the budget "in record time" and possibly adjourn by the end of May. The General Assembly has been known to work well into July in years past.

The budget shouldn't be as much as a problem as in 2011 because the state is in much better financial shape now. Also, he said to laughs from fellow lawmakers and reporters, he hopes that the General Assembly won't have to face a budget veto from Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, as they did with Democratic former Gov. Beverly Perdue.

Tillis said he's in favor of overhauling the state unemployment benefits system by July 1, even if that means that some long-term unemployed workers could lose their federal jobless benefits.

Lawmakers have proposed cutting the maximum weekly benefit paid by the state from $535 to $350 and limiting the number of weeks people can receive state benefits. Any changes to the state program this year, however, would end long-term federal benefits under the deal Congress worked out to avoid the so-called "fiscal cliff."

"Unemployment was never intended to to this long-term, almost kind of entitlement, program. It was intended to be a bridge to help people as they go back to work," he said, adding that clearing the state's debt to the federal government will help recruit new businesses that won't be on the hook for the unemployment bill.

House Minority Leader Larry Hall said Democrats would work with the Republican majority on "things that make sense," adding that "some of this doesn't add up."

“Saying we need regulation for puppy mills at the same time you’re saying we shouldn’t have regulations on education is an interesting way to posit it,” said Hall, D-Durham.


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Plenty Coups Jan 30, 2013

    doingmybest-"No different than liberals blaming everything bad on the upper class. So we have two extremes and not enough middle of the road sensible people to put an end to the senseless bickering. So we all lose."

    Some liberals do blame the rich. That's true. But i don't understand people from the middle class agreeing with "their party" (or team) that they should pay more so that the rich can pay less. Is it that important that your side wins so that you end up voting against your best interests? With a progressive tax system, the rich can and do pay a bit more of a percentage and still have plenty of income left for luxury.

  • DoingMyBest Jan 30, 2013

    "Conservatives don't. It's a kind of reverse robin hood ideology. Blame everything bad on the poor and middle class, constantly call them "takers" or the 47%, and insist they pay more so that the rich can pay less in taxes." PC

    No different than liberals blaming everything bad on the upper class. So we have two extremes and not enough middle of the road sensible people to put an end to the senseless bickering. So we all lose.

  • DoingMyBest Jan 30, 2013

    "I would expect poor people living on the state lines cross those lines for groceries and services such as hair cuts."

    Exactly, but is sounds so much better when placing the attack on the "so called rich". Because they never ever pay their fair share. It is so unfair.

  • dollibug Jan 30, 2013

    There are a lot of *ISSUES in NC which need to be addressed*....I can NOT believe that these people want to REDUCE unemployment benefits*WOW*

  • wildpig777 Jan 30, 2013

    most nc republicans are actually closet democrats-- watch what i say in the upcoming months regarding legistration.

    hey when you make voter id a major biggie-- that tells me all i need to know about the incompetance of the new adminastration.-- MEET THE NEW BOSS HE'S AS SLACK AS THE OLD BOSS.....

  • fauxpaws2000 Jan 29, 2013

    Hey, when your own governor packs up and leaves (No mas!) mid-term, exhaust fumes filled the vacuum. As the saying goes, we get the government we deserve. Thank you, Ms. Perdue.

    In a state, truly unrivaled for beauty from Carolina Beach to the Blue Ridge, please find a balance between compassion for the less fortunate and those to whom much has been given. I think there's an applicable verse in one of the many spiritual traditions.

    Faux Paws

    PS: Ummmm...anybody notice that there haven't been many (if any?) Hispanic posters? If anybody has a digital camera available for photo ID...

    The times, they are a'changin'!

  • Alexia.1 Jan 29, 2013

    If I were elected, I'd get rid of property taxes on one's primary residence. That is the worst tax in the world. It does not matter if you are employed or not... The government wants you to pay. We'd throw the elderly on the street over property taxes.

    Income taxes are reasonable. They don't have to be complex. Just tax at a given percent and be done with it. The income tax Ida's actually the most reasonable tax. If you make money, you pay a percentage to the government. If no salary, no tax.

  • banker27520 Jan 29, 2013

    ""Tillis may as well do as much as he can now... the GOP will lose control in 4 years." OleNCNative BINGO! thayerguy......Why?"

    Why not?

  • Dnut Jan 29, 2013

    "Spoken like a true liberal!"

    Is that supposed to be an actual argument? A label?
    Plenty Coups
    .....Both, just telling someone else what to do with there money and lives...

  • Plenty Coups Jan 29, 2013

    "Spoken like a true liberal!"

    Is that supposed to be an actual argument? A label?