Raleigh, N.C. — Around 6,000 workers could lose their jobs as the result of a state Supreme Court ruling upholding North Carolina's ban on video sweepstakes, according to one estimate.
Julius C. (JC) Poindexter, a former professor of economics and finance at N.C. State, wrote a paper in 2011 that estimated that between 4,800 to 6,000 jobs could be directly tied to the sweepstakes industry in North Carolina. That paper, Poindexter said, was financed by those who manufacture software for the industry.
Poindexter's paper points out that the economic impact of the cafes goes beyond the workers themselves. It includes the services, such as electricity and phone lines, and rent that the cafes use. From the white paper:
An adding up of all the categories of expenditures believed to be typical of a representative Internet cafe results in total monthly payments (on all of the varied inputs discussed above) totaling $21,230 monthly, or $254,760 yearly. These payments (which do not include payouts back to customers) largely go to state of North Carolina citizens and businesses. Local income for an area with a typical Internet cafe, then, sees a direct spending boost from the cafe of more than a quarter of a million dollars, with direct employment (employees plus contracted service labor) of a likely 8 to 10 North Carolina citizens. With 600 cafes operating in the state, each, on average, like the representative cafe described above, yearly direct spending benefits generated within the state are at least $152,856,000.
The industry has survived legal challenges before. The state Supreme Court ruling actually upheld the legislature's third attempt to outlaw video poker and its kin since 2006.
And it's unclear when enforcement may begin. Some cafe owners say they expect to have to shut down Jan. 3, but spokesmen for the Attorney General's office and other law enforcement agencies did not confirm that date. Update: The N.C. Sheriffs Association says the Attorney General's Office has just confirmed enforcement may start on Jan. 3. If a shutdown does happen, Poindexter said Monday it would mean many people will be looking for work.
"It's troublesome because the class of worker that the Internet cafes employ is a class of worker that's been most impacted by the effects of the Great Recession," Poindexter said. Low-skilled workers, he said, have found themselves hardest hit by the economic downturn. "It's a little hard to see where those replacement jobs are coming from."
The owners of strip malls and other retail spaces may find it difficult to replace the monthly rents they received from the cafes as well, Poindexter said.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This blog post is closed for comments.
December 17, 2012 2:54 p.m.
December 17, 2012 2:54 p.m.
December 17, 2012 2:55 p.m.
My first question: Who sponsored this research?
That this is a ‘white paper’, that is, no peer review process, is also a bit troubling….
I suspect that with a bit of review work into the paper there would be even more questions….
STS
December 17, 2012 2:57 p.m.
December 17, 2012 2:59 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:03 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:10 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:15 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:15 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:18 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:19 p.m.
Why? Because it's gambling or that the state doesn't get their cut as they do with the lottery?
December 17, 2012 3:21 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:24 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:29 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:39 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:40 p.m.
SO what? Let the gov start telling you how to spend your money all while the gov is doing what you want to do but wont let you. You libs will never understand liberty.
December 17, 2012 3:42 p.m.
I guarantee if the state was getting a cut of this somehow, this wouldn't be an issue at all. Same with marijuana; if the government could figure out how to regulate and tax something any Granny can grow in an old tin can on her kitchen window, marijuana wouldn't be illegal either.
Shame on our legislators!!! Figure out how to get a cut that will help fill the tax coffers to benefit the taxpayers of this state.
After all, this is a law legislating sin, which is no one's business but the sinner and their God.
December 17, 2012 3:43 p.m.
That's their business, not yours or mine.
December 17, 2012 3:44 p.m.
I know people that spend all their money on Jordans. What again is your commie point? Should we ban Jordans? LOL
December 17, 2012 3:44 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
So what!?!
Some blow their money on booze, some on ciggies, some on guns, some on fishing tackle, some on shoes, some on handbags.
Who cares!?!
What business is that of anyone else's?
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
I understand some peoples opposition to these establishments, but there will be many jobs lost if these businesses do close down. My largest establishment employs 32 people and they are paid very very well.
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:45 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:46 p.m.
Do you really want our government to legislate that much of our personal lives?
What next?
Them telling us exactly what kind of shoes to wear, or how to peel our oranges?
December 17, 2012 3:47 p.m.
allinfantsareatheists December 17, 2012 2:39 p.m. >>>>>>>>>> Your right, but stock traders cheat,,, so it's an insult to compare them to gamblers.
December 17, 2012 3:47 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:48 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:49 p.m.
December 17, 2012 3:52 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:03 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:04 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:05 p.m.
Where? I have been laid off for over 6 months and have put in over 400 applications and its really dried up since the election. And thats after working for over 30yrs.
December 17, 2012 4:12 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:19 p.m.
I know the owners of two of these places. Please tell me how these church going folks in Frnaklinton and Youngsville are involved in organized crime? LOL what in the world!!!
December 17, 2012 4:20 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:21 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:23 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:24 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:25 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:36 p.m.
This is a job, work, get it?
These were people who WANTED to work and didn't want to "invent a disability, get a lawyer and kick back on SSID" - cause I assure you, if they had wanted to do that to begin with, they probably would have made more money than a cashier in a sweepstakes location makes.
December 17, 2012 4:40 p.m.
My guess is that those legitimate businesses that have seen such establishments open up right next door to them are happy, as well...
December 17, 2012 4:41 p.m.
So what?
You think closing them down is going to stop those fools from wasting their money elsewhere?
They'll just divert it to the bogus North Carolina "Education" (cough cough) Lottery, and that's what the whole rub is for the state - they want that money spent on THAT lottery and not on sweepstakes.
December 17, 2012 4:41 p.m.
Talk about shooting oneself in one's own foot - all so they can regulate a sin industry which harms no one but those who CHOOSE to participate in it.
December 17, 2012 4:43 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:45 p.m.
If you're saying that, you have no idea what "organized crime" is.
These people don't hunt you down and break your ankles or nail your knees to the floor if you don't patronize them.
December 17, 2012 4:45 p.m.
December 17, 2012 4:48 p.m.