Raleigh, N.C. — The makers of software that drives sweepstakes gambling systems say they are appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court and have asked the state Supreme Court for a stay of an order banning the games.
In a unanimous decision last week, the state Supreme Court upheld a law that makes the games illegal.
"A brief stay of this Court's judgment is appropriate while Plaintiffs seek further appellate review," wrote Richard Gottlieb, a lawyer for International Internet Technologies, one of the companies involved in the lawsuit.
In his filing, Gottlieb writes that the U.S. Supreme Court "typically rules on petitions for certiorari two to three weeks after a briefing closes."
The games in question are designed around a system of drawings. Typically, players buy phone or Internet time and in return get entries into the sweepstakes. Software makers say the games merely reveal the pre-determined results in an entertaining way, not unlike contests conducted by soda bottlers or fast food chains.
But the state Supreme Court ruled the system was a work-around of North Carolina's broader ban on gambling and that lawmakers had the right to ban the practice.
State law enforcement officials said they had planned to begin enforcing the state law on Jan. 3, 2013. If a stay is granted, sweepstakes businesses could likely stay open until sometime in the spring, even if the U.S. Supreme Court does not decide to take up the case.




![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
December 20, 2012 3:41 p.m.
December 20, 2012 12:36 p.m.
December 20, 2012 4:26 a.m.
December 19, 2012 7:19 p.m.
Yes and a GOP controlled Supreme Court. Next.
vinylcarwraps23 December 19, 2012 4:13 p.m___________________________________ All of that is true, and Bev. also started looking at this as source of additional revnue for the state. Many counties saw a drop in tax when they shut em down a few years ago. If they're not going to regulate them, then yes shut em down. Right now there is too much room for abuse. The LEO don't like em due to complaint where someone spouse lost the rent money or whole pay check. They're also starting to be a source for arm robbery.
December 19, 2012 6:54 p.m.
December 19, 2012 5:14 p.m.
December 19, 2012 5:03 p.m.
December 19, 2012 4:29 p.m.
Yes and a GOP controlled Supreme Court. Next.
December 19, 2012 4:13 p.m.
Southern Democrats have ALWAYS been more socially conservative. The democrats started out as the party of social conservatism.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Bev_Perdue.htm
December 19, 2012 4:03 p.m.