@NCCapitol

Ban on gender-affirming care for minors in North Carolina clears another legislative chamber

House Bill 808, which passed 29-16, would also prohibit the use of state funds for gender-affirming care. The measure now heads to the state House.
Posted 2023-06-27T22:34:22+00:00 - Updated 2023-06-28T00:09:59+00:00
Rally for trans rights at State Capitol

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Restrictions on access to gender-affirming care for transgender youth have now passed both North Carolina legislative chambers, as the Senate on Tuesday approved a ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers and surgeries that is more stringent than what the House recently passed.

The Senate's proposal would prohibit any health care provider in the state from giving such care to anyone younger than 18, with exceptions for certain procedures or disorders. Medical professionals who violate the restrictions could have their licenses revoked and could be sued. The measure now heads to the state House.

That compares with the House's proposal, which only prohibits the performance of these procedures and therapies at public health care facilities, such as public hospitals or University of North Carolina affiliates.

The competing measures authored by Republicans in each chamber both prohibit using state funds to pay for gender-transition procedures.

With the Senate's proposal, young people who begin treatment before Aug. 1 could continue receiving such care if it's considered medically necessary and their parents consent. The House proposal takes effect Oct. 1.

Supporters of the bill say such care can have negative life-long effects on young patients. And on Tuesday supporters questioned the drugs used for such treatment, calling them potentially dangerous.

“They are experimental drugs for gender-transitioning purposes, and we have no idea what the long-term consequences are going to be,” Joyce Krawiec, R-Forsyth, said Tuesday during debate on the Senate floor.

The bill is titled the Youth Health Protection Act, but opponents say the bill does the exact opposite.

"They love to say, ‘Oh, we care about kids and we want to protect kids,’ but this isn't protecting kids,” said trans rights supporter and parent Rowan Bilodeau. “It's actually doing worse for kids."

Krawiec, who is shepherding the restrictions in the chamber, said children should be protected from receiving such life-altering treatments when they aren’t old enough to understand the long-term implications.

“The state has an interest in protecting our children from long-term harm," Krawiec said. "And that’s what this bill is all about.”

LGBTQ+ rights groups and parents of transgender youth fighting these limits said these bills will lead to increased depression for these young people and risk of suicide. They joined transgender persons in committee hearings recently demanding that the House and Senate measures be halted.

“Trans-affirming medical care saved my child's life,” Bilodeau said.

According to leading professional health associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association and the Endocrine Society, gender-affirming care is considered safe and medically necessary.

While trans minors rarely receive such surgeries, they are commonly prescribed drugs to delay puberty and sometimes begin taking hormones before they reach adulthood.

Senators debated House Bill 808 for nearly an hour. The measure would make exceptions for children who are currently using hormone therapy with parental an doctor’s consent.

If the bill passes, medical professionals who violate its provisions could lose their licenses.

Democratic opponents said Republicans were playing politics with people’s lives. They have also argued that such legislation would mar the state’s reputation and hurt its ability to recruit and retain businesses.

“Why would we pass legislation opposed by medical [professionals], creating litigation resulting in wasting hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, and most importantly, putting our most important kids in danger?” State Sen. Jay Chaudhuri, D-Wake, said.

Senate Democrats pointed to court cases, including one last week in Arkansas, where a federal judge issued a permanent ban on the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for children, declaring it unconstitutional. Similar bans in Alabama and Indiana have been blocked temporarily.

“You are attacking already marginalized kids and their families who do not want your opinion about their lives,” said Sen. Natasha Marcus, a Mecklenburg County Democrat. “There will be a lawsuit to stop this awful bill. You will waste a lot of taxpayer money dragging us through an embarrassing court case trying to defend this bill.”

Advocates opposed to the measure chanted “protect trans kids” from the gallery above the Senate floor after the vote, briefly delaying Senate activity.

Sen. Julie Mayfield, D-Buncombe, brought up Republican positions in other GOP-backed legislation espousing the virtues of parents’ rights — such as legislation that would require teachers to inform parents if a student questions their gender or sexuality.

“No one is in a better position to decide what is right for their children than their parents,” Mayfield said.

Bilodeau, who has four children, was one of several speakers Tuesday in a rally held by Equality North Carolina. She also took issue with provisions that prevent parents from weighing in on medical care for their children.

"Where are my parental rights in this equation?” Bilodeau said. “This is a private and personal medical decision."

Supporters of the measure have also spoken out in committee, with some describing cases in which people have stopped or reversed their gender-transition treatments. At least 20 states have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors.

Krawiec said she didn't know whether the House would accept the Senate version of the restrictions.

Otherwise, the two chambers could have to work out a consensus measure in the final weeks of the current session if they want to get a bill approved and sent to Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper. He has expressed opposition to bills that target trans youth. But GOP legislators have majorities large enough to override a Cooper veto if Republicans legislators remain united.

Also sent to Cooper's desk on Tuesday is legislation given final approval last week that would prohibit transgender girls from playing in middle school, high school and college sports designated for girls.

Credits