David GlennDavid Glenn's ACC Journal
ACC sports and recruiting guru David Glenn is now blogging for WRAL.com. Glenn is the editor of The ACC Sports Journal.

Ex-Players (Some Angry) Coming For "Duke Football Summit"

Duke officials expect about  200 of the school's former football players to be in attendance this weekend, when the university hosts an unpublicized "football summit," designed to discuss the future of its struggling program.

Athletic director Joe Alleva said he called the meeting, which will begin with a Friday night reception and continue Saturday with segmented presentations and discussions at the school's on-campus Yoh Football Center and the nearby Washington Duke Inn. Alleva and coach Ted Roof will be among the speakers at the event, and university president Richard Brodhead also hopes to attend.

Alleva said his goal is "to provide information to our football alumni, have them see where we are, have them meet Ted and listen to his philosophy, listen to their questions and suggestions, and most importantly funnel all their energy and passion into our common goal of having a competitive football team."

Duke has had only one winning record (8-4 in 1994) since coach Steve Spurrier left to take the Florida job after the 1989 season. Barry Wilson (1990-93), Fred Goldsmith (1994-98), Carl Franks (1999-2003) and Roof have combined for a 42-148 mark (22.1 winning percentage), 18-116 in the ACC (13.4 percent), over the past 17 years. The Blue Devils finished 0-12 this season, including a loss to Division I-AA Richmond.

More than a dozen former Duke players contacted by the ACC Sports Journal said their emotions toward the football program range from hope to concern to frustration to anger.

Brian Baldinger, a former Duke offensive lineman (1979-81) who also played in the NFL, said he thinks this weekend's meetings came about because of complaints from ex-players and other supporters of the program. He also said he was told that Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski supported the idea.

"Right now, Duke football is a drag on everybody, in every way," said Baldinger, who will be unable to attend the event because of his NFL playoff commitments as a commentator for Fox Sports and the NFL Network. "It's a drag on publicity for the university. It's a drag on revenues for the athletic department. I'm sure Coach K and the basketball program would benefit from a good football team, too.

"Right now, Duke isn't even close to being able to compete. And if you're going to bring back the coach that's 0-12, you're crazy."

Former Duke coach Tom Harp, who led the Blue Devils to a 22-28-1 record from 1966-70, said he will not be in Durham this weekend but that he has talked with many ex-players who are making the trip. He said the discussion is expected to revolve around the delicate balance between maintaining the university's academic integrity and giving the football program enough academic flexibility to become competitive.

"We've been having that debate for 40 years now," Harp said. "The problem at Duke is not coaching. They're good coaches, and they work very, very hard. Until you give your coaches the ability to sign players who can compete on an equal basis, you won't win. It's that simple. And losing today makes it harder to win tomorrow. You can't just keep getting stepped on and stepped on and stepped on.

"There are a lot of (upset former Duke players), and there should be. But these aren't easy questions. It might be easy somewhere else. It's not easy at Duke. Many people, including some former players, are very protective of the university's integrity and reputation, and they should be, too."

University secretaries and other staff members sent invitations to former players and have handled the planning for the event. The former players and other guests also were invited to attend the 2006 football team's regularly scheduled annual banquet Saturday night.
Read More Posts from this Blog

17 Comments


Golo

Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries.

You must be a registered WRAL.com user to use these tools. Click here to register or log in.

View Comments View Comments


page 1 | 2
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

As a Duke graduate and fan, I've watched Duke's games for over 40 years. I witnessed losing teams that played well and competed. Competing doesn't necessarily equate to winning. In the last 15 years, I've witnessed more than anything else is poor leadership. It visually appears lacking when sitting in the stands. There is little emotion from the players. Squads sit on benches facing away from the field so they cannot help support their teammates (I've yet to see another team on TV that does this). And almost always, Duke coaches play not to lose instead of playing to win. When you've lost so many times, you don't really need to play it so safe. You don't need to keep sending the single to your players that you don't think they are good enough to make a 4th and 1, opting for missed field goals instead. If Spurrier could win here, others can too, within the same academic standards. As Battier said about Coach K, he may not be the best coach, but his leadership inspires achievement.

When folks say don't "compromise the educational component" I really think we are talking a ton of rhetoric. Question...Do you consider Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, Boston College or UVA to be reputable, quality academic institutions? As an engineer (duke grad) you better believe that I'll put a vote in for GT and I think in general most of the world would look at the other three schools and say they aren't too shabby. My point, if Duke were to ease their standards similar to the schools listed, I feel rather confident that their "academic reputation" wouldn't take the mythical hit that so many say it would.

Wake Forest's academic requirements for football players right now rank behind Duke's but along with those of Boston College and Georgia Tech in the top third of the ACC. (Reminder: These things change over the years, as administrators and coaches change.) One way in which the Blue Devils place the bar even higher than the rest is that the university doesn't allow them to take anyone at the bare NCAA minimum level (e.g., 2.5 core GPA, 820 SAT), whereas everyone else in the ACC (and almost everyone nationally) has the discretion from their admissions departments to take "some" in that category. "Some" at some schools may mean only 1-2 per year, and at others there is no cap on the number per year. This number changes from year to year at each school, but many trends become obvious over longer periods.

Dave;

How do Duke's requirements compare to WF?

I work at Duke and see alot of the players come in my store. Alot of them are engineering, law or medical students who seem to appreciate their education more than any thing else. I hope that something can be done about the program simply so these future bright minds have a chance at college in the future.

As a Durham native and Duke fan living in Boise Idaho, I really believe it can be done. I have seen it and so has the nation. Playing on the "blue" "Go Bluedevils and BSU Broncos".

I would rather see duke lost 100 more games than to compromise the educational component.

It's too bad Duke's football team didn't get a chance to play the Wolfpack last season. At least they could have won that one. =)

Mlipi, I agree with your comment that there are other diamond in the rough coaches out there, however, Duke will not commit money to any of them. I know they have a nice new facility over there, but there just seems like there is no financial commitment from the school to put together a competitive coaching staff.

Coincidence that this comes in the wake of Wake's Dream Season ??? Is Duke thinking "if they do it, so can we!" ... There are probably other Jim Grobes out there and other RON WELLMANs but they are hard to find, then you have to leave them alone to get it done.

page 1 | 2
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

This blog post is closed for comments.

Featured Blogposts
  1. FANkind 400x300 image
    FANkind
    Guilford advances to Division III Final Four

  2. Brian Shrader's Siteseeing Blog
    Brian Shrader's Siteseeing Blog
    Three for Thursday

  3. FANkind 400x300 image
    FANkind
    And your bracket begins to crumble...


Other Recent Blogposts
  1. Bill Leslie's Carolina Conversations: All New Friday

  2. Brian Shrader's Siteseeing Blog: Gyroscopes and golf

  3. Bill Leslie's Carolina Conversations: Uniquely Southern

  4. Bill Leslie's Carolina Conversations: N.C. vacation poll

  5. Brian Shrader's Siteseeing Blog: There's a holiday for that