@NCCapitol

NC lawmakers ask: Should 16- and 17-year-olds be prosecuted as adults?

Posted June 15

Iisha Brown, left, and her daughter, Olivia Brown, 17, pose for a photo in their Charlotte living room Thursday, June 1, 2017 in Charlotte, N.C. Because Olivia Brown lives in North Carolina, she was charged as an adult for a school fight last year, and now worries that with a criminal record, her chance at a successful life is ruined, Since 1919, North Carolina has treated teens over the age of 15 as adults in its courts system. Now, state legislators are looking at a measure to raise the age of juvenile jurisdiction to include 16- and 17-year-olds, like in 44 other states, according to the National Conference of State Legislators' website. (AP Photo/Christina Sandidge)

— When potential employers conduct a background check on Olivia Brown, they see a 17-year-old who was cited for assault and having a weapon on school grounds — both misdemeanors from when she pepper-sprayed a girl during a fight at school last year.

What the employers won't see is a young woman who was previously homeless and still managed to graduate early from high school. Brown fears that her "stupid mistake" will wreck her dreams of going to college and one day becoming a psychologist.

If her school fight had happened almost anywhere else in the country, Brown's case would have been handled in juvenile court. But in North Carolina, 16- and 17-year-olds are tried as adults, and their public criminal records can follow them around for the rest of their lives.

"I can't even go to the mall by myself at 17, but I can get charged as an adult," Brown said. "When you graduate, you want to do something ... but no one wants to hire you now. ... I seemed like a criminal or someone dangerous, which I'm not."

Since 1919, North Carolina has treated teens over 15 as adults in its courts system. Now, state legislators are looking to "raise the age" of juvenile courts to include 16- and 17-year-olds, just like in 44 other states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures website.

In New York, lawmakers agreed in April to a two-year phase out of automatically trying 16- and 17-year-olds as adults. In five states — Texas, Georgia, Wisconsin, Missouri and Michigan — 17-year-olds are prosecuted as adults.

North Carolina's "raise the age" proposal, which received overwhelming support from the House in a 104-8 vote in May, would shift the cases for teens accused of misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies to the juvenile court system, where records are confidential. Teens facing violent felonies, such as murder and rape, could still be tried in adult court.

The measure is now in the Senate, where a competing proposal exists.

Despite the support to "raise the age," some opponents argue that punishing teens as adults sends a message that North Carolina is tough on crime.

"Let's continue to administer justice against crime and take care of the victims, not follow the crowd, going soft on crime," said Rep. Larry Pittman of Cabarrus County, a Republican who voted against the measure.

Supporters say teens such as Brown are at a disadvantage compared with youths in other states. A criminal record may hurt Brown from securing a loan for college. And she could face difficulty applying for professional licenses and certificates and even securing public housing, said Rep. Marcia Morey, a Democrat from Durham County.

As a former judge, Morey said she saw people in their 40s and 50s struggling to get promotions and new jobs because of convictions from their teenage years.

"It still has lasting consequences," Morey said.

Data from the North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission showed that misdemeanors made up about 80 percent of the crimes that 16- and 17-year-olds who were convicted of in 2014, while only a small fraction, roughly 3 percent, were violent felonies.

Brown's mother, Iisha Brown, said her daughter was recently interviewed for a job at a store and was turned down because of her criminal background check. The family said they have been back and forth to court to try to get the charges dismissed.

"I cry sometimes when my daughter is not around," Iisha Brown said. "I want her to live her dreams. I don't want this taken away from her."

Supporters of raising the age say 16- and -17-year-olds serving time in adult prison are at an increased risk of being sexually assaulted and victimized, and are more likely to re-offend.

According to New Hanover County Chief District Judge J.H. Corpening II, teens incarcerated in adult prisons sometimes don't get the rehabilitation and resources they need.

The juvenile court model "gets at the heart of what drives these behaviors," Corpening said.

3 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Robert Swiger Sr. Jun 15, 6:21 p.m.
    user avatar

    Depending on the crime

  • Henry Cooper Jun 15, 4:34 p.m.
    user avatar

    I don't think you can out an age on it. Some at age 16-17 should be tried as adults dependent on the crime.

    For the brain... It is at its full potential for about 20-30 years of your life. If we set a minimum age based on brain capabilities them could someone argue that a 68 yo was on the decline and didn't fully understand anymore? I could see a slick lawyer getting it in as a defense.

    Its a slippery slope both ways.

  • Raleigh Rose Jun 15, 3:48 p.m.
    user avatar

    The human brain is not fully mature at 16 and 17. If you can't drink, enter into a contract you shouldn't be tried as an adult.