Comments :: Congress OKs cliff deal, signaling future fights
Congress OKs cliff deal, signaling future fights
Click here to return to the Story
320 Comments
Free Career Evaluation for IT training!!
How much do hearing aids cost? Click here.
Unlimited Boating w/ Freedom Boat Club only 249/mo



![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Well, we're finally in agreement!
The current US government has had a public debt for almost its entire existence... It had one from 1789 to 1835... it began to have one again by 1836... the current ~16 trillion dollar one began in 1836, so "where that money went" would take a lot longer accounting than the 1000 characters allowed here can do.
I can tell you where most of it did NOT go though!
Unemployment, food stamps, and welfare.
But those are pretty small portions of our budget.
so it's weird those are the only things your terrible analogy included as drains on the finances.
If you'd like to see where the most recent ~6 trillion came from (and where the projected 2000 surpluss went)I suggest:
http://www.upworthy.com/the-complete-guide-of-what-to-blame-for-our-debt-problem-brought-to-you-by-math
January 2, 2013 6:17 p.m.
January 2, 2013 5:38 p.m.
Nobody does.
Which is a problem.
Because you have yet to present a single coherent argument anybody can understand from start to finish.
In this respect you have a lot in common with your hero Ron Paul.
And now you're making less sense than ever, since Rule 40 is a rule specific to the republican party... so your bringing it up in a discussion of 3rd party candidates is frankly bizarre.
I suppose you had to throw something really weird out there to try and change the topic away from how Gary Johnson having ballot access in nearly every state totally disproves your earlier point...
Which we also apparently didn't understand.
Just a suggestion- if NOBODY ever understands ANY of your points, perhaps you should learn to do a better job communicating them?
(or find some points that make sense to anyone but yourself)
January 2, 2013 5:10 p.m.
January 2, 2013 4:58 p.m.
Sure I do.
You don't understand how elections work. especially in the US.
A 2-party system is inherently HIGHLY likely in any first-past-the-post voting system, like ours. Any useful 3rd party is the rare exception in such systems.
Because generally any vote for the 3rd (or lower) runner in the election is a vote for the winner. junkmail5 January 2, 2013 4:06 p.m
I very much understand. Rule 40. Any questions? You have no clue what Im going for. LOL
January 2, 2013 4:55 p.m.
Mainly it's terrible because:
A) you had one guy with a real job paying a higher income tax rate than anyone in the US does... and nothing about the services he gets from Sam.
B) It's unclear who Sally is supposed to represent at all, because nobody gets paid more in government handouts than the guy with a 40% income tax rate (or even a 25% rate), and certainly not for working half-time.... so that part makes no sense whatsoever.
C) Billy is a bit fuzzy too, since nobody gets paid 50% of the salary of a 40% income tax person on unemployment- so it suggests you don't even understand the program you're trying to compare here...
D) Billys food stamps are a problem too, since 20% of the daily pay of the top earner is VASTLY more than anyone gets in food stamps daily, so again you seem to know nothing about the program you are comparing
So other than nothing in your analogy reflecting reality in any way...
January 2, 2013 4:50 p.m.
January 2, 2013 4:27 p.m.
If we ran the economy like you write analogies we'd be in worse shape than we are now!
January 2, 2013 4:12 p.m.
January 2, 2013 4:11 p.m.
http://xkcd.com/1049/
But sure to hover your mouse over the comic and read the text as it really drives the point home.
January 2, 2013 4:09 p.m.