@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Senate seeks to curb local tax use

Posted July 16
Updated July 17

A new Senate proposal would give counties more leeway to raise sales taxes but would ban them from using revenue to meet education and transportation needs at the same time.

— A new Senate proposal would give counties more leeway to raise sales taxes - but would ban them from using that revenue to meet education and transportation needs at the same time.  

House Bill 1224 is scheduled for a floor vote in the Senate on Thursday. 

The legislation, unveiled as a Senate substitute in the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday, would allow counties to raise sales taxes by a half-cent, rather than a quarter-cent, to pay for education funding. It would cap the local rate at a maximum of 2.5 percent, which, when added to the current state sales tax of 4.75 percent, would mean a maximum sales tax of 7.25 percent in any county. 

Counties would still need to obtain voter approval for any increase. 

However, the proposal requires counties seeking an increase to raise their local rate all the way to 2.5 percent, disallowing counties currently at 2 percent from seeking a smaller quarter-cent increase.

It would also require counties to use all new revenue generated by a hike for either education needs or transportation needs, but not both.

Counties would not be allowed to have a quarter-cent sales tax for transportation and another quarter-cent for schools. If they have or institute a sales surtax for schools, they would have to repeal it or allow it to expire before going to voters for a new increase for transportation needs. 

That change would most immediately affect Mecklenburg County, where commissioners are backing a quarter-cent sales tax increase on the ballot this fall. The money would mostly go to supplement teacher salaries. But the county would have to scuttle that plan, since it has already enacted a half-cent transit tax, bringing it to the cap of 2.5 percent.

It could also affect Wake County, where Democratic commissioners have proposed a quarter-cent sales tax increase to pay for teacher raises. The county Board of Commissioners is expected to vote Aug. 4 on whether to put the referendum on the ballot in November.

The proposal would force the increase up to a half-cent instead, and block Wake from proposing another tax increase for transportation needs. That, in turn, would relieve political pressure on the Republican majority on Wake's board, which has resisted growing calls to put a half-cent transit sales tax before voters. 

Durham and Orange counties currently have a 2.75 percent local sales tax, which exceeds the proposed cap, because they have also already enacted a half-cent transit tax. Under the proposal, they would be allowed to keep that rate unless one of their surtaxes is allowed to lapse, at which point they would not be allowed to reinstate it.

Sen. Josh Stein, D-Wake, said he was puzzled by the proposal.

"Why wouldn’t we allow it if they chose to designate a quarter-cent to transportation and a quarter-cent to education? Why must it be one or the other?" Stein asked. "What if they have needs for both?"

Sen. Rick Gunn, R-Alamance, had no ready answer.

"We really want to try to make a commitment emphasizing education," Gunn said. "Allowing a choice to be made is the appropriate avenue to take."

"I’m confused," Stein responded. "Why we would not allow the counties to have what they want?"  

"If you’re going to raise sales taxes for schools," Gunn said, "we’d like you to go ahead and make that decision."

Advocates for county and local governments were also confused by the measure.

Johanna Reese with the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners said her group is "concerned about loss of flexibility in the use of the funds."

"This is a rather large change to be making so quickly. Perhaps the committee could consider sending this to the Revenue Laws Study Committee," Reese told the panel.

Erin Wynia with the North Carolina League of Municipalities seconded the call to send the proposal to a study committee before implementing it. 

"We appreciate the attention to the needs of local governments," Wynia said, but added the League of Municipalities is concerned about "the effect it could have on regions to raise funds for transportation – those are usually levied at the county level."

Local transit advocates say it could devastate plans for multi-county systems, such as the one currently in the planning stages in the Triangle.

"This is a really bad bill that could kill the transit referendum for Wake County," said Karen Rindge with WakeUP Wake County.

Another source, speaking on background, said, "It pits transit against education, and transit's going to lose every time."  

25 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • wraluser Jul 18, 12:46 p.m.

    Actually, the GOP can see the writing on the wall for 2016 and are now planning for the next election cycle. You see, the GOP kicks anything hard down the road for the Democrats to clean up when the GOP once again leaves a train wreck in their wake of controlling any governing body. The Democrats then clean it up at a great cost and effort only to have that cost and effort used against them in the next cycle... by the same folks that created the problems in the first place!!! This is the GOP cycle and our collective short memories allow the GOP to continue as a party.

    lather, rinse repeat...

  • wraluser Jul 18, 11:49 a.m.

    More proof that the GOP NCGA actually wants NC to FAIL... These people need to be run out on a rail... never to return...

  • AliceBToklas Jul 17, 5:37 p.m.

    Shouldn't it be up to each community that raises said taxes to spend that money on what they... View More

    — Posted by dwntwnboy2

    Sadly, you may have to wait a while. I'm not sure I see it getting better anytime soon.

  • for the people Jul 17, 3:40 p.m.

    interesting to read the outrage from this group regarding this article. i read your posts everyday and most of you are fine with education, tax, abortion, gay rights, drug law etc policy and control from the federal level if it meets your agenda. then you turn around and have the 'overreach outrage how could they do this to the local communities slant'. stunning. i'm sure this won't get past the moderators since they don't want more centered views posted on this site but what the heck, i'll try anyway.

  • dwntwnboy2 Jul 17, 1:24 p.m.

    Shouldn't it be up to each community that raises said taxes to spend that money on what they need without having their hands tied by the GA?? This GA has been a disaster since they took over- can't wait when sanity comes back to NC and we get rid of these clowns.

  • iopsyc Jul 17, 1:13 p.m.

    Good. Stop the assault on the middle class with ever increasing taxes.

    — Posted by aspenstreet1717

    "the proposal requires counties seeking an increase to raise their local rate all the way to 2.5 percent"

    How exactly is that stopping "the assault"?

  • Come On_Seriously Jul 17, 12:02 p.m.

    Again, the GOP mantra seems to be 'smaller government is best,' but only when we're not in control.

    The NC GOP is like a spoiled child who hates all the things that his big brother can do, so he beats up on his little sister to make up for it.

  • UNJUSTIFIED Jul 17, 11:03 a.m.

    Dont cry now NC,,,,You voted these fools into office....

  • 42 Jul 17, 10:45 a.m.

    It's a local tax State level GOPers should buttout

  • krimson Jul 17, 10:39 a.m.

    If Bev's bunch were still in "control", how much would our taxes and give away programs be... View More

    — Posted by stymieindurham

    Do you care to actually comment on the topic at hand, or are you as usual just going to play the... View More

    — Posted by dahill001

    Stymie never talks about the topic, he only ever tries to deflect. For someone that loves the "party of small government"... I'm not sure why he can't man up and at least try to make an attempt to defend his party's edict to local governments as to what they can and can't do... Oh, I take that back, I do know why...

More...