@NCCapitol

@NCCapitol

Senate readies elections, ethics overhaul

Posted December 15, 2016

— State Senate committees were poised Thursday to take up a sweeping rewrite of how North Carolina oversees compliance with campaign finance, lobbying disclosure and ethics rules.

Senate Bill 4 was filed late Wednesday after lawmakers revealed they would hold a special session to take on a hodgepodge of unfinished ministerial matters and politically inflected legislation.

The bill would roll the state's Board of Elections, Ethics Commission and a division of the Secretary of State's Office that oversees compliance with lobbying laws into a single independent agency. Although that's not a controversial idea by itself, the specific rules that would govern the agency have critics raising questions about partisan intent and whether it will be able to effectively administer the laws it is charged with overseeing.

The new State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement would be run by an eight-member board split evenly between Republicans and Democrats. The bill would also change how cases make their way through the appellate courts, alter appointments to the state Industrial Commission and make appellate court elections partisan.

This is not the first time that lawmakers have sought such a merger. A similar merger was proposed in 2013 but never passed. At the time, lawmakers argued it would be more efficient to put all agencies that deal with public trust issues under one roof. Because the new oversight board will be evenly split, backers say it will avoid the appearance of partisan entanglements.

"This group will be a nonpartisan committee because it will be completely balanced," said Sen. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg.

But the move could be viewed as one of a number of partisan swipes the GOP-controlled General Assembly has aimed at Gov.-elect Roy Cooper, a Democrat poised to take office in January after defeating Republican Gov. Pat McCrory. Currently, the State Board of Elections is a five-member panel, with three members appointed from the governor's party. This bill would deny Cooper a prerogative enjoyed by other modern North Carolina governors.

Under rules set up in the bill, the board would need six votes to exercise most of its oversight powers, including issuing subpoenas or calling new elections.

"​The biggest problem with the Board of Elections rewrite proposal is the requirement to have six votes of an eight-member bipartisan board to take substantive action," said Mark Ezzell, a Democratic member of the Wake County Board of Elections. "This will turn the State Board of Elections into a toothless tiger, much like the Federal Elections Commission."

The bill is complex and contains a number of other provisions. They include:

  • State Supreme Court and Court of Appeals races would be partisan under this bill. Currently, judges for appellate courts run in nonpartisan contests. Under those nonpartisan rules, Republican Supreme Court Justice Bob Edmunds lost his seat this year to Superior Court Judge Mike Morgan, a Democrat.
  • The current five-member State Board of Elections would be dismissed and replaced with the sitting members of the state Ethics Commission. They would remain in place until this summer, when a new board would be appointed. The state board was forced to handle a number of unforeseen events sparked by federal court rulings. During the year, it ignored urging from Republican Party officials to limit early voting hours and refused to countenance a number of voting fraud cases brought by the state GOP.
  • Of the eight-member board, half would be appointed by the governor. The remainder would be appointed by the legislative leadership.
  • The new board would alternate the chairmanship between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans would chair the board during even-numbered election years, while Democrats would have that job in off-years.
  • Local boards of elections, which are currently three-member panels, would become four-member boards evenly split between Republicans and Democrats. As with the state board, local boards would alternate the chairmanship. Due to how the chairs alternate, Republicans would head the boards of the state's largest counties, such as Wake and Mecklenburg, in even-numbered years, when partisan elections take place.
  • The bill restricts the new state board from playing any role in drawing new voting districts. At one point this year, a federal judge contemplated requiring the State Board of Elections to draw new maps for Wake County.
  • The ability to appeal certain cases to the state Supreme Court would be limited under the bill. Instead, some cases would have to first be heard en banc by all 15 Court of Appeals judges before heading to the Supreme Court. This would, in effect, slow the progress of a case to the state's highest court.
  • The bill effectively extends the term of Bill Daughtridge, McCrory's former secretary of administration, on the Industrial Commission by six years. It would also allow McCrory to appoint the chairman of the commission, who would serve over the next four years.
5 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Matt Wood Dec 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    Sure, but cronyism is ALWAYS going to exist, because people are always going to trust and hire people they know first. But that's not the point of my post.

    The point of my post is that, by reducing the number of at-will positions from 1300 to 300, McCrory's 1000 appointees will get to stay. Since you will never get rid of cronyism, we should at least make it fair for both sides and apply the same rules to both. If it was good for McCrory, then it should be good for Cooper. Essentially, this is saying McCrory and the Repubulicans get to keep their cronies even though McCrory lost the election.

  • Roscoe P Coltrain Dec 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    Isn't cronyism still cronyism when democrats do it?

  • Matt Wood Dec 15, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


    They didn't cut the number of appointees from 1300 to 300. Those positions would still exist, the governor would just no longer have power to hire/fire those people at-will. And I'll remind you that it was originally expanded to 1300 when McCrory was elected so that they could put in their own people. Now, they're trying to restrict Cooper from doing the same thing. If you can't see how dirty that it, then... well, you'd probably be lying since it benefits your side.

  • Danielle White Dec 15, 2016
    user avatar

    Republicans get chairmanship in even number years, Democrats odd-numbered. Now if that isn't on of the most blatant attempts at retaining partisan control...

    Translation: the Republicans chair the boards for the most major elections years - federal, governor, etc.

  • Roscoe P Coltrain Dec 15, 2016
    user avatar

    "This bill would deny Cooper a prerogative enjoyed by other modern North Carolina governors."
    Isn't cronyism still cronyism when democrats do it? Cutting the number of appointees from 1300 to 300 seems like a good thing, but apparently WRAL only engages in liberal support these days. The CBC editorials are laughable...I have lived in Raleigh for 30 years and used to enjoy the News on WRAL...now that they have gone NBC they are no better than the N&O.