'Red route' repeal hostage to politics?

Posted March 6, 2013

A fix that would allow N.C. Highway 540 to move forward is on shaky ground – and it's looking like the next victim of the political tension between House and Senate Republican leaders.

House Bill 10 started out as a simple measure to repeal a 2011 law banning the study of the so-called "red route" for N.C. 540, which would cut through the middle of Garner. Town leaders and economic developers lobbied for the ban, saying the mere possibility of the alternate route was stifling business and development in the area.

The ban, which passed easily, had the unintended effect of cutting off all federal money for the highway loop – a $2 billion project that's more than halfway built.

House Speaker Pro Tem Paul Stam and Senior Budget Chairman Nelson Dollar, the sponsors of the repeal bill, said rescinding the ban is necessary to allow the feds to study the red route, triggering the restart of the project's federal funding. It won House approval by a wide margin.

Big changes 

But a funny thing happened on the way to the Senate.

In committee Wednesday morning, Transportation Budget Chairman Bill Rabon ran an amendment to remove three turnpike projects from state statute – the Mid-Currituck Bridge, the Garden Parkway in Gaston County and the Cape Fear Skyway.

Sen. Chad Barefoot Senate debates proposed Garner highway

The amendment puts those projects back into competition for transportation dollars, sending their earmarked funding into the Mobility Fund to be used for projects statewide.  

The amended bill passed the Transportation Committee unanimously and was rushed onto the Senate calendar for a floor vote. 

"It is time-sensitive to get the 540 project moving,” Rabon, R-Brunswick, told his colleagues, failing to mention that the bill has been sitting in his committee for more than two weeks. 

The Senate tentatively approved the amended measure, 37-13. But third reading was held up by an objection by Minority Leader Martin Nesbitt, who insisted on knowing more about the funding moved within the bill. 

"This bill does not kill any project. It simply brings the rats into the daylight," Rabon said. "It makes everyone compete on a level playing field for every project in the state. It just makes everything fair and legal and transparent."

Latest chapter

Less transparent, perhaps, is the fact that this is just the latest chapter in battles over those turnpike projects between the House and Senate.

In the 2012 budget, the Senate, at Rabon's request, added language to the House version to cut the funding for the Mid-Currituck Bridge and the Garden Parkway by 50 percent in perpetuity. 

That language was removed from the final appropriations bill, but it was a contentious sticking point in House/Senate negotiations – one that neither side has forgotten.

Last week, House and Senate leaders openly skirmished over Senate Bill 10, which calls for sweeping changes to state boards and commissions. That bill is now in conference committee.

House leaders also have been complaining about the Senate's delay in sending the governor House Bill 4, which provides funding for group homes to make up for changes in Medicaid rules.

Rabon's turnpike overhaul may make the red route fix the latest pawn in the inter-cameral chess game.

If it's not a "catfish amendment" in the House, it's very close to one. The fact that the bill's two sponsors are House leaders probably didn't go unnoticed by Senate leaders, either. At the very least, it's likely to make for an uncomfortable caucus meeting when the measure comes back to the House.


House Republicans were apparently blindsided by the amendment.  

Stam, R-Wake, wasn't in the committee meeting till the end. He said later that he wasn't yet sure about what the amendment did.

Dollar, R-Wake, has not yet responded to questions about what the change means for the bill's future. 

House Transportation Chairman Bill Brawley wouldn't say much, either. He represents part of Gaston County, where the Garden Parkway would be built.

"Wheels within wheels," he said, refusing to offer an opinion. "I'm going to to talk to Rabon."

Berry Jenkins Advocate says future of NC toll roads jeopardized

Berry Jenkins, chairman of NC Go!, a coalition of more than 100 transportation advocacy groups across the state, said he supports the idea that road projects should be ranked and prioritized based on their merits. Yet, the amendment concerns him.

"We would hate to see tolling taken off the radar screen of the public (as) one of the viable methods to fund transportation projects in North Carolina," Jenkins said. "We've got to consider that as one of the methods we have."

He predicted that the three projects Rabon wants thrown back into the mix for general highway money likely won't be high-priority projects for the forseeable future.

Jenkins also said he hopes the amendment doesn't scuttle the bill, saying N.C. 540 needs to be completed.

"We'd like nothing to slow down the Wake County project because that's a critical corridor for traffic mobility and congestion relief," he said.


This blog post is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • superman Mar 8, 2013

    The proposed highway was the reason Slim Jim left. Maybe they should reconsider and build the shortcut in Pender County. More land but it would be a longer commute. How do you think you can build roads in a high density county like Wake without disruption? This is the same old same old--people want things but they dont want their world rocked. It is ok if I have to be relocated but when it gets in their backyard thats a different story. Build the road. Would be happy if they just deleted it from their plan and repave the streets in our neighborhood that are over 30 years old. I would even be willing for them to make it a roll road.

  • DrJ Mar 7, 2013

    It seems so simple and obvious to prioritize highway projects, just the way we the people do every day in our own lives. Leave it to the politicians to turn the simple into a big ugly mess.

  • dorindarindy Mar 7, 2013

    I would expect it to be Republicans who want to plow right through Garner. They could care less how it would destroy Garner, and its wonderful appeal. It would bring more traffic, crime, and plow right through tons of wonderful neighborhoods, and businesses that make Garner. Selfishness and greed are destroying this planet, and I hope it doesn't destroy Garner. This route with forever change Garner, for the worse.

  • ckblackm Mar 7, 2013

    NotUrTypicalAmerican, you'd whine too if your house or business was being threatened by the Red Route... or if you were going to be unfairly double taxed for 540. (not to mention the lovely repair of the southern loop of 440)

  • Whatdaheck Mar 7, 2013

    "Garner is becoming like Cary...a town full of whiners."

    WOW! Lets take a highway that's had land set aside for it since the mid-1990s (been part of the town's planning for an entire generation) and let some dimwit tree-hugger discover some dwarf wedgemussel in a stream in that path so that the feds now want to preserve these critters at the expense of a town. THAT's what this is all about. Running the 540 southern loop along the new Red Route would be devastating to the town. This is the FEDS dictating to NC.

    Frankly, we'd prefer to have a clambake in these mussel's honor as a fundraiser for something worthwhile.

    This IS NOT whining, I assure you.

  • NotUrTypicalAmerican Mar 7, 2013

    Garner is becoming like Cary...a town full of whiners.

  • YouGot2BeKidding Mar 7, 2013

    Ok, so North Raleigh gets access to this roadway for free / no toll while every other area has to pay for use. And the bottom line is the southern part of this loop will never be built because no one sees any value in building it...excuse after excuse.

  • dsdaughtry Mar 6, 2013

    Wow! Politics in Raleigh just went from politics as usual to becoming downright bizarre. When republicans are fighting other republicans clearly sends a message that the GOP will eventually become two separate parties in future. The sad part about the entire legislative agenda in Raleigh is that the focus seems more about religion in schools, ridding of appointed people, photo ops with Billy Graham rather than trying to bring jobs or recovery to North Carolinians.

  • ct girl Mar 6, 2013

    Who cares about this stupid route section if it is going to be a toll road. djhartm

    The people who care are ones whose town will be divided by a highway that was not suppose to be built there. It will destroy 13 neighborhoods, a church and the town’s primary industrial recruitment area, one company that was going to employ 250 people with an average wage of $60,000 has already pulled out due to the red route being put back into consideration. Not to mention the damage to the White Deer Park and Lake Benson area as well.

  • djhartm Mar 6, 2013

    Who cares about this stupid route section if it is going to be a toll road. I'll never use it. Based upon my usage observations, it appears many feel the same way as the the current toll section sits largely devoid of traffic. I hope it turns out to be an epic failure as it is a disservice to NC taxpayers.