Proposal to move parks oversight met with skepticism

Posted April 2, 2015

A trail at Eno River State Park.

— Gov. Pat McCrory's proposal to take management of state parks away from North Carolina's environmental regulators met with questions from lawmakers Thursday who wanted to know more about the potential benefits and costs of the move.

The shift, included as park of McCrory's budget proposal, would move state parks, the state's aquariums, the North Carolina Zoo and other attractions out of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and put them under the supervision of the Department of Cultural Resources. Cultural Resources already runs some attractions, such as the North Carolina Museum of History and historic sites across the state.

"What we believe the transfer will do is streamline government," DENR Chief Deputy Secretary John Evans told a meeting of the Joint Natural and Economic Resources Committee, the group of representatives and senators that has direct oversight of DENR's budget.

However, lawmakers wanted to know more about the real cost savings that might be behind that belief.

"There aren't really a whole lot of hard numbers or hard forecasts as to what real savings you think you might generate from this," said Rep. Brian Turner, D-Buncombe. "Will we see some more information to go on rather than, 'We think it will be more efficient'?"

Evans said the agency was working on developing those numbers.

The idea for the transfer was first raised by NCGEAR, McCrory's government efficiency program.

"We know that they're there. We just have not fully identified them," Joseph Coletti, who works for NCGEAR, said of the potential savings.

Both Coletti and Evans warned that, in the short term, the proposed shift might not save much money. In the long term, they said, attractions would benefit from being able to share costs such as advertising and purchasing.

That left lawmakers wary of signing off of the proposed move.

"I have a lot of reservations on some of these proposals," Rep. Jimmy Dixon, R-Duplin, said.

Among NCGEAR's recommendations is that, along with the move to a new department, many parks and attractions raise their fees or start charging for things, such as parking at Fort Fisher.

That caught the attention of Rep. Pat McElraft, R-Carteret, who said that the real estate community endorsed the creation of transfer taxes years ago with the understanding that they would support the park system. Parks, she said, were good for property values.

"It seems as though every year the parks get less and less funding," McElraft said.

House lawmakers are expected to roll out their budget sometime in May.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Jeff Edwards Apr 2, 2015
    user avatar

    "It seems as though every year the parks get less and less funding," McElraft said.Tell me, Rep McElraft, what doesn't get less funding these days with the slash and burn budget you and your cohorts keep passing?

  • Phil Larson Apr 2, 2015
    user avatar

    I don't think this is a terrible idea with regard to the parks and the zoo. They do hold a great deal of cultural value. I would hope that it wouldn't impact their funding. However, if this means taking any power away from our GA is not likely, they have literally gone power and control freaks (see re districting of Wake county, also the Governor having to take them to court to regain his power of appointments to committees and the UNC BOG).