Elon, N.C. — A majority of North Carolina residents favor various measures to regulate gun purchases, according to a poll released Monday.
Elon University Poll, which surveyed 891 people statewide last week, also found that North Carolina residents favor an identification requirement for voting and a path to U.S. citizenship for illegal immigrants. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.28 percentage points.
Fifty-six percent of respondents support a ban on assault rifles, and 55 percent want the size of ammunition magazines limited. Women and minorities overwhelmingly supported the two restrictions, as did older adults.
The only segment where a majority opposed an assault weapons ban was among respondents ages 18 to 30.
Meanwhile, requiring a background check for all gun buyers is favored by 93 percent of those polled, and 83 percent back a mandatory waiting period for handgun purchases.
“Support for background checks and waiting periods before purchasing a gun is very broad in North Carolina, but proposals to ban certain types of guns or large capacity magazines is less appealing to many citizens,” Elon University Poll director Kenneth Fernandez said in a statement.
In other issues covered in the poll, 72 percent of respondents support the idea of requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls. The findings are consistent with an Elon poll conducted a year ago.
Ninety-three percent of Republican respondents back an ID requirement, compared with only 52 percent of Democrat respondents. The GOP-controlled legislature has been trying to get a voter ID law passed for two years, but Democratic lawmakers have vehemently objected, saying it would create a barrier to voting for older and poorer people.
Yet, the two segments of respondents that gave the strongest support for voter ID were people 65 or older and people with incomes less than $25,000.
Eighty percent of respondents say they support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, but only 51 percent said they believe immigrants benefit North Carolina. Thirty-eight percent they believe immigrants are a burden to the state.
A majority of Republican respondents characterized immigrants as a burden to the state, but even 69 percent of them called for a pathway to citizenship.
“Our poll results show what many people have known for a while, which is that many North Carolinians have a generally positive view of immigrants,” Fernandez said. “One reason for this may be because North Carolina’s agricultural sector relies so heavily on immigrant labor.”




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)









WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This blog post is closed for comments.
March 5, 2013 9:47 p.m.
They claim it was a scientific poll but we are just supposed to trust some academic liberals to be honest? Sorry, but they didn't inverview me, or anyone I know.
But we could do another "Scientific" poll around the state. Lets start at Ft Bragg, then Camp Lejeune, and a few other areas including, say Henderson.
March 5, 2013 4:50 p.m.
there are no 800 ropund clips though. Stop scaring people, they are already irrevocably uniformed as it is
March 5, 2013 3:12 p.m.
remember that when they come for your abortions
March 5, 2013 3:10 p.m.
LOL now just how would you show that posters on WRAL are representative of NC population?
March 5, 2013 3:02 p.m.
please show that the poll was not correctly carried out.....because unless it was, then its fact not a lie.
March 5, 2013 3:01 p.m.
LOL try buying a stinger missile....Gov and SCOTUS decides what you can have not your warped interpretation of the 2nd.
March 5, 2013 3:00 p.m.
not if you only have fuel for 1 mile at that speed......
"An AR can fire at a RATE of about 800 or so rounds per minute."
but a ten shot magazine would only allow you to fire for 0.075 of a second at that rate.....and then you would have to reload to get another 0.075 seconds fire! with reloading taking much longer than that clearly a smaller magazine will definitely reduce the number of shots in a given time period and give more chances when the gunman can be tackled as at Tucson.
March 5, 2013 2:58 p.m.
no, just one step closer to having rational gun regulation. If you think the founders intended that one person would be able to field the fire power of an entire 18th century regiment and do so to kill school kids you are delusional. They were not fools.
March 5, 2013 2:47 p.m.
March 5, 2013 12:20 p.m.