WRAL Investigates

One year after gaming raids, cases dropped against some NC businesses

Posted March 26, 2015
Updated March 27, 2015

— Nearly a year after federal investigators directed gaming machine raids at close to 200 North Carolina businesses, WRAL Investigates has found that prosecutors are dropping many of the cases.

The Train Station, a Cary bar and restaurant, was one of the businesses caught in the middle of the raids last spring. It was targeted as part of an illegal gambling operation linked to video poker machines.

WRAL Investigates informed owner Richard Oakley that federal investigators have voluntarily dismissed the seizure of thousands of dollars and gaming machines from his restaurant.

“I'm glad to see that they realize that it's better to drop this,” he said.

Oakley's bar was one of dozens of cases dropped by federal prosecutors who cited low dollar amounts and other considerations. No charges were ever filed.

Investigators haven't dropped bigger cases, like the one against gaming machine supplier Ricky Godwin in Johnston County or Big Boy's Truck Stop in Kenly, where agents seized more than $400,000, including the owner's savings

“We’re in America,” Oakley said. “I shouldn't have to worry about someone who can just come in and rob me legally.”

Every year, North Carolina law enforcement officers seize millions of dollars in cash, homes and other property from residents under a controversial program that allows officers to take the property even if the person hasn’t been charged with a crime.

North Carolina law doesn't allow police to take property unless it's part of a criminal case. To get around the law, many agencies turn to a federal program called equitable sharing.

In most cases, it starts with a traffic stop. If an officer finds a large amount of cash and thinks it's tied to drugs, for example, the officer takes the money and asks a federal agency to adopt the case. In nine out of 10 cases, if it's federally adopted, the driver will never see the cash again, with most of the money staying with local police.

In Oakley’s case, a video showed state Alcohol Law Enforcement agents raid his business. They took machines and all of the money in the restaurant, about $7,000.

“It crushed me that day. I didn’t even have change to give a customer,” Oakley said. “Eight guys walking around with guns and badges smashing, literally, a machine open in the middle of my dining room. It was insanity.”

Officers say the seizures are a valuable crime-fighting tool, but opponents say it's a system ripe for abuse.

Defense attorney Damon Chetson is a critic.

“It’s a roundabout way the government seeks to take money from folks to impoverish them and also to penalize them,” he said. “People don’t know about this system until it actually happens to them, and they’re asking themselves, ‘How do we live in America where the police can just come along and seize money, cars, assets from me without any definitive proof that I’m guilty of anything?’”

It's that sentiment that convinced U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to issue an order on Jan. 16 putting more restrictions on police seizing assets. But there is still plenty of gray area in the order.

Eddie Caldwell, executive vice president and general counsel of the North Carolina Sheriffs' Association, says the program has several benefits – taking money away from people engaging in illegal activity, saving taxpayer money and helping the law protect people.

“In some agencies, they use the funding to pay for overtime for officers or to put extra officers on the street to buy equipment,” he said.

Durham police spent some of its money on the American Tobacco Trail Initiative after a series of attacks. The Granville sheriff spent $214,000 for new patrol vehicles.

Caldwell defends the program and says he doesn’t believe it lends itself to government overreach.

“The laws we’re talking about were enacted by Congress and not law enforcement,” he said. “Law enforcement is not out to seize assets from law-abiding citizens, but they are out to seize assets from criminals.”

Since equitable sharing began, North Carolina law enforcement has seized $130 million in assets, the fifth most of any state. Of that money, local agencies kept about 80 percent. Because it is civil forfeiture, the owner of the money must prove it's not tied to illegal activity.

WRAL Investigates requested equitable sharing annual reports from several local agencies.

Equitable sharing funds by agency

please wait

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Dennis Hunter Mar 28, 2015
    user avatar

    BTW, We do have a nominee for Attorney General who all agree is well qualified and has passed other nominations. I am sure since the present one is disliked (by a minority), that all would join in allowing a swift up of down vote on our next Attorney General? Voting is the American way we decide things ...

  • Dennis Hunter Mar 28, 2015
    user avatar

    Ok, let's pretend this was a fire arm as opposed to cash or your home. So the police stop you and you possess a fire arm. Since I know we all love the second amendment, do the police get to keep your gun or your home so that they can sell it?

    Does this just look like a for profit scheme?

  • Dennis Hunter Mar 28, 2015
    user avatar

    Ok, this is REAL simple! This is America, we are assumed to be innocent until PROVEN guilty! Unless one is PROVEN guilty no government should deprive them of ANYTHING! If we have a way that that American principle is being subverted then THIS is the start of changing that.

  • William Mitchell Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    Hey Jim, you do realize the LEO's don't pass law....no you most likely don't. Never mind...

  • William Mitchell Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    WRAL Investigates...I think not. Typical liberal spin placed on your story. Please "investigate" and give us all an example of a seizure that occurred where property and/or money was seized and said property was not a direct benefit of "Proven" criminal activity. You can't. When an officer stops a vehicle and locate a large sum of cash..that alone is not a crime and hopefully it never will be. It is not illegal to possess currency! These funds are seized, typically along with drugs, when one of two things occur. Either the driver claims no knowledge of the currency (typically located in a "trap", or secret co partment, which is a Federal Crime, or the cash is, as stated above, found with large amounts of illegal drugs. I can on for ever on this. But why...the media spins and always will. And by the way...Eric Holder...is a sad excuse for an Attorney General

  • Chris Byrd Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    The government isn't your friend!!!

  • Phil Shmoe Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    Civil forfeiture without evidence of a crime is a tyranny of the state.

    But WRAL should not equate the actions here to such tyranny - the illegal machines were in plain view inside the establishments and there would be absolutely no question that the owners knew about it. Seizing property and assets linked to the crime makes sense.

    WRAL does an injustice to those victims of power-hungry law enforcement by equating these two scenarios.

  • Matt Price Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    Here's the deal. It is robbery to barge into ones place of business, tackle and destroy a machine, and take the money without due process. PERIOD.

    And I believe anyone who was part of that is able to sue the hell out of the government for unlawful prosecution, and violations of the RICO act as the whole issue is susceptible to the Boss Hogg Syndrome.

    If agencies are using the money without the completion of due process - then they are on the hook to pay it back.

  • Peter Panda Mar 27, 2015
    user avatar

    what a bunch of nonsense that was

  • Jimmy Jordan Mar 26, 2015
    user avatar

    How do these cops sleep at night? Which one is the good cop here? I'm sure we will get the "just following orders" nonsense. Same thing was said at the Nuremburg trials.