Official: Trump wants to slash EPA workforce, budget

Posted January 26

— The former head of President Donald Trump's transition team at the Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday he expects the new administration to seek significant budget and staff cuts.

Myron Ebell said in an interview with The Associated Press that his specific recommendations to the White House remain confidential. But Ebell, who left the transition team last week, said it was reasonable to expect the president to seek a cut of about $1 billion from the EPA's roughly $8 billion annual budget.

He also said Trump is likely to seek significant reductions to the agency's workforce, currently about 15,000 employees nationwide, with 8,000 of those in Washington. Ebell declined to discuss specific numbers of EPA staff that could be targeted for pink slips. Asked what he would personally like to see, however, Ebell replied that slashing the agency's workforce by half would be a good start.

"President Trump said during the campaign that he would like to abolish the EPA, or 'leave a little bit,'" said Ebell, who has returned to his position as director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington.

"I think the administration is likely to start proposing cuts to the 15,000 staff, because the fact is that a huge amount of the work of the EPA is actually done by state agencies. It's not clear why so many employees are needed at the federal level," he said.

The EPA has a major research center in Research Triangle Park, employing some 2,000 people, and Triangle-area universities and non-governmental organizations receive millions in EPA grants. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for example, has received $44 million in grants from the agency over the last five years, while research firm RTI International has about $30 million in EPA grant funding.

Mike Walden, an economist at North Carolina State University, which has about $2 million in EPA grant funding, said more than 10,000 people in the region have jobs tied to federal contracts.

"It's a multi-billion-dollar industry here in the Triangle. A lot of it is centered around universities," Walden said. "What that does is send shivers through a lot of people who say, 'Well, is this the first sign of maybe a massive pullback by the federal government."

Representatives of RTI and area universities said it's too early to say what impact, if any, EPA cuts would have on local contracts and the research they fund.

EPA officials said in a statement that the agency "is continuing to award the environmental program grants and state revolving loan fund grants, and we're working to quickly address issues related to other categories of grants."

Walden said he believes North Carolina's congressional delegation will work to spare EPA's operation in RTP and the grants to area universities from cuts.

The EPA has been roiled by turmoil during its first week under Trump, as members of the transition team issued what it has described as a temporary freeze on all contract approvals and grant awards. Trump's representatives have instituted a media blackout, clapping down on media releases, social media posts and other external communications issued by career staff.

Trump's political appointees have also been scrutinizing reports and data published on the agency's websites for potential removal, especially details of scientific evidence showing that the Earth's climate is warming and man-made carbon emissions are to blame.

Ebell, whose academic credentials are in philosophy and political theory, said Tuesday the purge is necessary because EPA's leaders under President Barack Obama "politicized" global warming and allowed activists within the agency to publish "junk science."

"We are definitely concerned about the signals we are getting from the Trump administration," said Rachel Weber, climate and energy organizer for Environment North Carolina. "There are a handful of science-based agencies that do work to protect our environment, to research climate change, to protect us from a changing climate, and ... those are the agencies being targeted by this new administration."

Trump's nominee for EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt, said during his Senate confirmation hearing last week that he disagreed with past statements by the president alleging that global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese to harm U.S. economic competitiveness. But like Trump, Pruitt has a long history of publicly questioning the validity of climate science.

Earlier this month, NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a joint statement affirming that 2016 was officially the hottest year in recorded history, breaking prior records set in 2015 and 2014. Studies show the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have decreased in mass, while the world's oceans have risen on average nearly 7 inches in the last century.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Ken Ackerman Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    "Trump's representatives have instituted a media blackout..."

    Anyone ever follow the timeline of Hitler's actions when he took control of Germany?

  • Tom Baker Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    When do we finally learn that the environment is not some luxurious, opaque entity to be observed in a zoo by progressives. In fact, the environment is the air we all breathe, the water we all drink, and the soil we all build our houses on. We need strong protection for that.

  • Buster Brown Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    The EPA--especially under Obama--has been used as a political weapon to help Obama gain his political agenda item of making America a 3rd world nation---of strangling industry especially the energy companies and manufacturing industry. Do away with it totally--no. Cut out a bunch of the regulations, fire a larger number of employees and make it stick to its intended responsibilities..all the talk here of gloom and doom and ecological disaster--wow--how did humans ever get along without the EPA?

  • Tracy T. Dalrymple Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Keep drinking the Kool-aid....

  • Tony Biancardi Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    Many of you will be asking "whose stupid idea was this?" when we are once again caught in smog and drinking, swimming and bathing in polluted waters.

  • Andrew Stephenson Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    View quoted thread


  • Dmitry Suemeov Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    I hope he takes away their Select-Fire Weapons also. I have no idea why the EPA needs select-fire (Three-Round-Burst) weapons.

  • Andrew Stephenson Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    Keep in mind everyone. The EPA employs 15,376 people. As in, regular every day people like you and I. We have a large EPA campus over on T.W. Alexander.

  • Kevin Oliver Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    Three words... coal ash spills. Sure, cut back the EPA and FDA, because corporations can always be trusted to regulate themselves and would never expose Americans to harm in the name of profits. Let's slash Wall Street regulation too, because the capitalists learned their lesson after the mortgage meltdown and would never do anything greedy or self-serving again.

  • Teddy Fowler Jan 26, 2017
    user avatar

    Awesome! They have long been overstepping their authority.....