News

Obama unveils $500 million gun violence package

Posted January 16, 2013

— President Barack Obama on Wednesday launched the most sweeping effort to curb U.S. gun violence in nearly two decades, announcing a $500 million package that sets up a fight with Congress over bans on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines just a month after a shooting in Connecticut killed 20 school children.

Obama signed 23 executive actions, which require no congressional approval. But the president, speaking at the White House, acknowledged the most sweeping, effective actions must be taken by lawmakers.

"To make a real and lasting difference, Congress must act," Obama said. "And Congress must act soon." He added, "I'll put everything that I've got into this."

The president appealed to the nation's conscience, but his announcement promises to lead to a bitter fight with a powerful pro-gun lobby that has long warned supporters that Obama wanted to take away their guns.

The U.S. has the highest rate of gun ownership of any country in the world, and pro-gun groups see any move on gun restrictions as an offense against the right guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Critics counter that the country's founding fathers never could have foreseen assault weapons more than two centuries ago, when guns were intended for the common, not individual, defense, guns were often stored in community areas and rifles fired one laborious shot at a time.

"This is the land of the free and the home of the brave, and always will be," Obama said, acknowledging the right to possess and bear firearms. "But we've also long realized ... that with rights come responsibilities."

Obama was joined by children who wrote him letters about gun violence in the weeks following the Connecticut shooting. Families of the children killed in the shooting, as well as survivors, were also in the audience.

Emotions have been high since the Connecticut shooting, which Obama has called the worst day of his presidency. He largely ignored the issue of gun violence during his first term but appears willing to stake his second term on it now. He'll have to contend with looming fiscal issues that have threatened to push whatever he proposes aside, at least for a while.

Gun control advocates also worry that opposition from the powerful National Rifle Association and its allies in Congress will be too great to overcome.

"Attacking firearms and ignoring children is not a solution to the crisis we face as a nation," the NRA said in a statement after Obama's announcement. "Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our children will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy."

The NRA also released an online video Tuesday that called Obama an "elitist hypocrite" for having armed Secret Service agents protect his daughters at school while not committing to installing armed guards in all schools. The NRA insists that the best way to prevent more mass shootings is to give more "good guys" guns.

The White House called the NRA video "repugnant and cowardly."

Obama's proposals are aimed at gun violence in general, not just mass shootings. He said more than 900 Americans have been killed by guns in the month since the Connecticut shooting.

"Every day we wait, the number will keep growing," he said.

The public appears receptive to stronger federal action on guns. Nearly six in 10 Americans want stricter gun laws in the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. Three-quarters of Americans said they reacted to the Connecticut shooting with deep anger, while 54 percent said they felt deeply ashamed it could happen in the United States.

The poll also shows 51 percent said they believed laws limiting gun ownership infringe on the public's right to bear firearms.

White House officials, seeking to avoid setting the president up for failure, have emphasized that no single measure — even an assault weapons ban — would solve the scourge of gun violence. But without such a ban, or other sweeping Congress-approved measures, it's unclear whether executive actions alone can make any noticeable difference.

The office of the most powerful Republican in Congress, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, signaled no urgency to act on the proposals. "House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said. "And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a fellow Democrat, called Obama's package "thoughtful recommendations" and said the Senate would consider legislation addressing gun violence early this year.

The president asked Congress to renew the ban on high-grade, military-style assault weapons that was first signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1994 but expired in 2004. Obama also called for limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds or fewer, and he proposed a federal statute to stop purchases of guns by buyers who are acting for others.

The president also called for a focus on universal background checks. Some 40 percent of gun sales take place without background checks, including those by private sellers at gun shows or over the Internet, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

The president's framework is based on recommendations from Vice President Joe Biden, who led a wide-ranging task force on gun violence. Beyond the gun control measures, Biden also gave Obama suggestions for improving mental health care and addressing violent images in video games, movies and television.

The president also called for improvements in school safety, including putting 1,000 police officers in schools.

States and cities have been moving against gun violence as well. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Tuesday signed into law the toughest gun control law in the U.S., and the first since the Connecticut shooting. The law includes a tougher assault-weapons ban and provisions to try to keep guns out of the hands of mentally ill people who make threats.

The NRA criticized the bill, saying in a statement, "These gun control schemes have failed in the past and will have no impact on public safety and crime."

In Washington, it's unclear how much political capital Obama will use in pressing for congressional action.

The White House and Congress will soon be consumed by three looming fiscal deadlines, each of which is expected to be contentious. And the top Republican in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, has warned the White House that it will be at least three months before the chamber considers gun legislation.

Congress, in any case, can move slowly. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Wednesday he'll begin hearings in two weeks on gun safety proposals. Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, a gun owner, said he envisions a series of hearings examining violence in popular media and how to keep guns safe, among other topics.

Leahy's plan could take more time than Obama has urged.

Obama's long list of executive orders includes the following:

— Ordering tougher penalties for people who lie on background checks and requiring federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

— Ending limits that make it more difficult for the government to research gun violence, such as gathering data on guns that fall into criminal hands.

— Requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

— Giving schools flexibility to use federal grant money to improve school safety, such as by hiring school resource officers.

— Giving communities grants to institute programs to keep guns away from people who shouldn't have them.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace, Erica Werner, Ken Ritter, Josh Lederman Michael Gormley and Michael Virtanen contributed to this report.

441 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • Minarchist Jan 17, 11:59 a.m.

    From the put a cop in every school fund? vinylcarwraps23

    So it's okay to protect banks, financial organizations even the president with armed individuals but not our children? Can't make the connection there.
    Offshore
    January 17, 2013 9:14 a.m.
    Report abuse

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------

    I never see an armed guard at my bank, ever. Anyhow what is putting a cop in every school going to do? Nothing. Spending is your friend all of a sudden.

  • Offshore Jan 17, 9:14 a.m.

    From the put a cop in every school fund?
    vinylcarwraps23

    So it's okay to protect banks, financial organizations even the president with armed individuals but not our children? Can't make the connection there.

  • Offshore Jan 17, 9:12 a.m.

    Obama added, "I'll put everything that I've got into this."

    Too bad he doesn't set the same standard to run the country and setting budgets and deficit reduction. Enforcing laws we already have would be a great start to gun control.

  • junkmail5 Jan 17, 8:54 a.m.

    All he has to do is cancel one of his many vacations and there will be the money to pay for it!!!!
    littleriver69

    You know he has taken significantly less vacation than the last guy in the office, right?

  • littleriver69 Jan 17, 8:30 a.m.

    All he has to do is cancel one of his many vacations and there will be the money to pay for it!!!!

  • dae66 Jan 16, 7:46 p.m.

    ATTENTION LIBERALS. Imagine if you will: It's October of 2001. The country is still grieving the horrific events of 9/11. George Bush decides to announce/sign the Patriot Act, and uses children as a backdrop, reading letters they "wrote" to say how much they want protection from terrorists. What's your reaction?

  • rmsmith Jan 16, 7:38 p.m.

    Appears to me based upon all the comments, no one trusts the government. Congress has the absolute lowest approval ratings, refuses to cut spending and inacting knee jurk reaction laws.

    That probably explains why everyone is so concerned about the proposed gun laws.

    If Thomas Jefferson was still around, he would tell us all "I told you so" Now what are you going to do about it

  • mxteam44 Jan 16, 7:38 p.m.

    Oh brother! Some of the comments on here make me wonder if a good percentage of liberals actually have a functioning brain.

  • ruthpauly Jan 16, 7:10 p.m.

    wow we have an extra 500 million for this? Cant feed the kids or teach them or clothe them but lets pull this out of our tails. Good reason to raise the debt. The guns they speak of protect us from the same people putting these rules in place.

  • dae66 Jan 16, 7:01 p.m.

    What the liberal voter does not understand is that this ban will not keep this type of weapon out of the criminal or insane person's hands. PERIOD!

More...