'It gets me mad' - Obama acts alone on gun control

Posted January 5, 2016

— Tears streaking his cheeks, President Barack Obama launched a final-year push Tuesday to tighten sales of firearms in the U.S., using his presidential powers in the absence of tougher gun restrictions that Congress has refused to pass.

The president struck a combative tone as he came out with plans for expanded background checks and other modest measures that have drawn consternation from gun rights groups, which Obama accused of making Congress their hostage. Palpable, too, was Obama's extreme frustration at having made such little progress on gun control since the slaughter of 20 first-graders in Connecticut confronted the nation more than three years ago.

"First-graders," Obama said woefully, resting his chin on his hand and wiping away tears as he recalled the December 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. "Every time I think about those kids, it gets me mad."

Obama's 10-point plan to keep guns from those who shouldn't have them marked a concession by the president: He'll leave office without securing the new gun control laws he's repeatedly and desperately implored Congress to pass.

Although Obama, acting alone, can take action around the margins, only Congress can enact more sweeping changes that gun control advocates say are the only way to truly stem a scourge of mass shootings.

"It won't happen overnight," Obama said. "It won't happen during this Congress. It won't happen during my presidency." But, he added optimistically, "a lot of things don't happen overnight."

The centerpiece of Obama's plan is an attempt to narrow the loophole that exempts gun sales from background checks if the seller isn't a federal registered dealer. With new federal "guidance," the administration is clarifying that even those who sell just a few weapons at gun shows, flea markets or online can be deemed dealers and required to conduct checks on prospective buyers.

Whether that step can make a significant dent in unregulated gun sales is an open question and one not easily answered.

Millions of guns are sold annually in informal settings outside of gun shops, including many through private sales arranged online. But the Obama administration acknowledged it couldn't quantify how many gun sales would be newly subjected to background checks nor how many currently unregistered gun sellers would have to obtain a license.

Easily reversible by a future president, the government's guidance to gun sellers lacks the legal oomph of a new law, such as the one Obama and likeminded lawmakers tried but failed to pass in 2013. The Justice Department said online the guidance "has no regulatory effect and is not intended to create or confer any rights, privileges, or benefits in any matter, case, or proceeding."

What's more, none of the steps would have probably prevented any of the recent mass shootings that Obama invoked in the East Room: Aurora, Oak Creek, Charleston, Newtown and the deaths last year of three Muslims in Chapel Hill, to name some. But Obama defiantly rejected that critique, dismissing it as the tired trope of gun lobbyists who question "why bother trying?"

"I reject that thinking," Obama said. "We maybe can't save everybody, but we could save some."

Hoping to give the issue a human face, the White House assembled a cross-section of Americans affected by searing recent gun tragedies, including former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Mark Barden, whose son was shot to death at Sandy Hook Elementary, introduced the president with a declaration that "we are better than this."

Obama readily conceded the executive steps will be challenged in court, a prediction quickly echoed by Republicans.

"I’ve been committed to protecting the Second Amendment rights of Americans since I was elected. I will continue to defend our constitutional rights, regardless of President Obama’s personal preferences," U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, said in a statement labeled "President's Gun Grab."

"Our president remains under the impression that he is above the law. He is, once again, working around Congress to demonstrate a flagrant disregard toward our Constitutional rights and the separation of powers between our three branches of government," Republican 2nd District Congresswoman Renee Ellmers said in a statement. "This type of go-at-it-alone behavior has not – and will not – be tolerated."

Meanwhile Democratic 4th District Congressman David Price, the vice chairman of the House Democrats’ Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, said he believes new rules could be put in place that wouldn't infringe on anyone's constitutional rights.

"The reforms President Obama announced today are limited in scope, but they are a well-designed first step and fall well within his constitutional authority," Price said in a statement. "Pretending the problem doesn’t exist won’t make it go away. Neither will pandering to special interests over the concerns of the majority of the American people. Congress must finally get the message that something can and must be done about gun violence."

Chuck James, a former federal prosecutor who practices firearms law at the firm Williams Mullen, said opponents are likely to challenge Obama's authority to define what it means to be "engaged in the business" of selling guns beyond what's laid out in the law. The White House asserted confidence Obama was acting legally, and said Justice Department and White House lawyers had worked diligently to ensure the steps were watertight.

Other new steps include 230 new examiners the FBI will hire to process background checks, aiming to prevent delays that enabled the accused gunman in Charleston, S.C., to get a gun when the government took too long.

Obama is also asking the government to research smart gun technology to reduce accidental shootings and asking Congress for $500 million to improve mental health care. Other provisions aim to better track lost or stolen guns and prevent trusts or corporations from buying dangerous weapons without background checks.

Obama's announcement carved a predictably partisan fault line through the presidential campaign.

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, both competing for the nomination from Obama's party, pledged to build on his actions if elected. The Republican field formed a chorus of voices vowing to annul the whole package, with Marco Rubio claiming "Obama is obsessed with undermining the Second Amendment."

"Rather than focus on criminals and terrorists, he goes after the most law-abiding of citizens," said House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican. "His words and actions amount to a form of intimidation that undermines liberty."

The National Rifle Association, the largest gun group, panned Obama's plan and said it was "ripe for abuse," although the group didn't specify what steps, if any, it will take to oppose or try to block it.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Hamilton Bean Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Clarence---whatever it is you are smoking---you need to put it down--like now...Its seriously erroding your grasp of reality..

  • Clarence Drumgoole Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    I wish The President could run for a third term. Hopefully he will be back. The smartest, brightest young man to ever serve these United States.

  • Rachel Parrish Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    King Obama acts again. I'm all for background checks but I don't appreciate our president acting without conferring with our citizens.

  • Colin Burch III Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    If the President was more interested in results than political gestures he would work with Congress to reach an agreement by consensus. But he really doesn't want consensus because he thinks he should be able to rule without oversight and the checks and balances established by the Constitution. Our government serves at the will of the people. If the people wanted his executive actions their legislators would pass the necessary laws.

  • Lori De Stefano Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    Congress refused to pass it because you're an &$!#/+. It's not the guns killing people it's the people who have no respect or morals for another life. You are not God and we have a constitution for a reason. This man aggravates me off to no end (WRAL won't let me post how I really feel) and I wish he were already gone, I can't wait another 360 days for him to leave.

  • Greg Klayton Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    We said. Excellent comment!

  • Hamilton Bean Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    OHHHHHH--Pleeeeze--spare me the crocodile tears. Obama cares not one iota about ANY of those people killed in these incidents. He cares not one whit about the people of this nation, and even less for the nation itself. His theatrics might impress those who blindly and robotically bow to Obama, but for the vast majority of the people, he's a complete waste of skin and air.

  • Colin Burch III Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    When government officials make a rule or pass a law that is suppose to be in response to an event they should be required to explain how the rules or law would have caused a different outcome. The connectivity is missing making this a purely political gesture. What is needed:

    “Caesar hoped to reform men by changing institutions and laws; Christ wished to remake institutions and lessen laws by changing men.” Will Durant

  • Greg Past Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar


  • Sonja Yagel Jan 5, 2016
    user avatar

    View quoted thread

    Exactly true, the kid who did the shooting at Sandy Hook had his mother's gun she bought legally. These crocodile tears Obola is shedding is just a step in the direction to take guns out of the law abiding citizen's hands. First it was cigarettes, now its your guns.