State News

Burr plans to block U.S. attorney nominee

Posted December 10, 2009

— Republican Sen. Richard Burr said Thursday he will hold up a White House attempt to replace the federal prosecutor overseeing a probe of two-time presidential candidate John Edwards.

Burr said in a statement that he will support the nomination of Charlotte lawyer Thomas Walker only after current U.S. Attorney George Holding completes investigations into Edwards and former Democratic Gov. Mike Easley. Burr said Walker's political contributions to Edwards and Easley "represent a conflict of interest."

"Given the importance of these investigations to the people of North Carolina, and in the interest of good governance and transparency, I believe the investigations must be directed by and have the full attention of the U.S. attorney, and the U.S. attorney himself must have the full faith of the people of North Carolina," Burr said.

"Delaying this nomination will ensure that the investigations and potential prosecutions will proceed with impartiality and, in turn, provide the public with full confidence that justice is served in an even-handed manner," he said. "At the same time, it will allow Mr. Walker to start his tenure as U.S. attorney free from any unfair specter of speculation and cynicism.”

Campaign finance records show Walker gave $750 to Edwards' presidential campaign in 2003. He donated $2,000 to Easley in 2004 and $250 in 2002.

The announcement was a shift for Burr, whose office said last week he planned to sign the so-called "blue slip" that home-state senators give to the Senate Judiciary Committee to move the nomination process along. Burr's Democratic counterpart, Sen. Kay Hagan, has also pressed the White House not to replace Holding but has not decided whether to block Walker's nomination.

Little is known about the status of the Edwards and Easley probes. Edwards, a former North Carolina senator who competed with President Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primaries and later went into seclusion after acknowledging an extramarital affair, has denied any improper use of campaign funds.

Easley has also denied wrongdoing. A federal grand jury has been hearing testimony about Easley's travel, a coastal subdivision where he owns property, and his wife's hiring at North Carolina State University.

Walker, 45, is a partner at Alston & Bird, LLP. He was an assistant U.S. attorney in the western district of North Carolina from 1994 to 2001.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • blackdog Dec 11, 2009

    ...After all....Justice is secondary to party politics...Right ?

  • foetine Dec 10, 2009

    socialismistic? Quit making up words to sound smarter than your prison GED courses.

  • rushbot Dec 10, 2009

    Hurrah for Senator Burr! He is saving us from Obama's socialismistic tendencies.

  • foetine Dec 10, 2009

    does Mr Walker want to keep his job?

  • dono422 Dec 10, 2009

    The way Obama is spending money why not just keep them both on the job and then he can claim it as a newly created job........

  • Unbroken Dec 10, 2009

    The party of "No!" rolls on...

  • pbjbeach Dec 10, 2009

    I would like to say to senator burr that he needs to make up his mind he is either for or aginst mr walkers nomination as u.s. attorney general for north carolina an the same to mrs hagen. i say go ahead with the nomination of mr walker thru the sentae confirmination process an the allow for mr holding to stay on just long enough as an assistance u.s attroney to complete the current investigations of both easley & edwards an onece completed allow for mr holding to stay long enough to complete any additional actions against these named partys as required by law but in the mean time go ahead with the nomination of mr walker thank you

  • timothycapwell Dec 10, 2009

    Will Kay Hagan put her money where her mouth is and stand with Burr?

  • Road-wearier Dec 10, 2009

    I usually think Senator Burr is a party-line-toeing hack, but in this case I agree with him. Leave George Holding in place till the investigations are done. If Mr Holding conjures up a political hack job case I'd expect a jury to pitch it out I am an acquaintance of Mr Holding and can't say as I can tell he's got a single political bone in his body...

  • Dad of 7 Dec 10, 2009

    Only makes sense. Let him get appointed after the investigations that way the conflict of interest issue wont be an issue.