Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

7:11 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Perdue has no plans to release life inmates


e-mail print friendly
N.C. inmates to go free under old law
N.C. inmates to go free under old law

Gov. Beverly Perdue said late Thursday that she has no plans to release 20 prison inmates next week, despite the appellate court's decision that would mean that they had served out their life sentences and should be freed.

"While I understand the decision of the Supreme Court, I believe there remain unresolved legal issues that were not addressed," Perdue said in a statement. "Until these new legal issues have been resolved by the courts ... (the) violent offenders will not be released."

Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the state Court of Appeals that a state law from 1970s defined a life sentence as 80 years and that, when good-behavior credits were included, some inmates had completed their sentence. The law was changed a few years later.

Under the ruling, the inmates are set to be released next Thursday.

North Carolina prison officials have spent recent days double-checking the good behavior credits to determine whether the 20 felons are even eligible for such credits.

Chrissy Pearson, a spokeswoman for Perdue, said Thursday that the Department of Correction is verifying that the credits were "lawfully and correctly applied." Officials are "exploring every angle," she said.

Correction spokesman Keith Acree said staffers began searching records several days ago, and state lawyers also are looking at ways to keep the 19 men and one woman behind bars.

"If the lawyers come back with some radical interpretation that's different from the way we've been doing business over the years, then we don't know what will happen," Acree said.

Perdue, who is on a 12-day trade mission to Japan and China, said in her statement that her legal counsel believes the Department of Correction never had the authority to give inmates a day credit in the 1980s for each day served.

"Like most of my fellow North Carolinians, I believe life should mean life, and even if a life sentence is defined as 80 years, getting out after only 35 is simply unacceptable," she said.

Attorney General Roy Cooper said in a statement late Thursday that there was no deadline for releasing the inmates.

"In the interest of public safety and to ensure that sentences and release dates are properly calculated according to law, we have advised the Department of Correction that no prisoners have to be released until further direction from the courts," Cooper said. "We continue to believe that these prisoners need to remain behind bars, as we have argued for more than two years to the courts.

Senate Majority Leader Tony Rand said in a statement late Thursday that he supports Perdue's reading of the law.

"Our first responsibility is to public safety," Rand said. "Based on our review and as an attorney myself, I am confident that the Department of Correction is under no obligation to release these prisoners next week."

Three state Republican Party leaders sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Roy Cooper and Correction Secretary Alvin Keller, saying they believed the credits should not apply legally to these 20 prisoners.

"A thorough legal review will show that the department's policy is flat out contrary to the statutes," the letter said.

It's impossible to say at this point whether a mistake would merely keep one of the 20 behind bars a little longer or mean the person would never be released, Acree said.

Longtime defense attorney Joe Cheshire said Thursday that everyone in the justice system – judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys – understood at the time that a life sentence meant 80 years. Later, they also understood the effect of changes in sentencing laws on those 80-year life sentences, he said.

"If someone wanted to complain, the time to do it was then," he said. "You don't go back and change the rules to hurt people because all of the sudden, you don't like the rules that were enacted legally back then."

Perdue said she found the idea of releasing the offenders "one of the most appalling things I've ever heard."

"I find it just unacceptable that it may happen in North Carolina," she said in a telephone interview from Beijing. "I really don't know what the answer is going to be, but everybody I talk to understands clearly that letting them out is not the answer that I'm going to be able to live with."

Later, she joked with reporters about the possibility of being found in contempt of court. "If I go to jail, are you going to visit me? Somebody told me that they were going to bring me cookies."

The state is looking at other ways to keep the prisoners behind bars, including whether one, Steven Wilson, could face new charges related to an accusation in 1990 that he sexually assaulted a girl while on work release, Acree said. Criminal charges were never pursued – Acree said he hasn't been able to find out why – although the Department of Correction did take disciplinary measures, including transferring Wilson to a more secure prison.

Wilson was sentenced to life in prison for abducting and raping a 9-year-old girl in 1977.

Bobby Bowden, the inmate whose lawsuit led to the Supreme Court ruling, has to wait at least until next month for his sentencing to be reheard in Cumberland County. He was convicted in 1975 of two murders.

Judges don't have to schedule a hearing until after Oct. 29, and two Superior Court judges are now conducting lengthy trials and a third has to recuse himself because he represented one of Bowden's co-defendants in the original trial.

RELATED TOPICS: Cumberland County, Beverly Perdue, Supreme Court

e-mail print friendly

182 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 182 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
HLN news had this story on for 15 minutes givig NC a fit the beginning of the week so I emailed them today at CNN to let them know what the governor is doing. I sent them the url to look this story up. Who knows they may be contacting some of you news reporters on this story since it made the news of how scandalous it was to let them all out as violent as they are.

"nclude the Judges names WRAL so we know WHO NOT TO VOTE FOR! affirmativediversity"

In North Carolina the election of judges in non partisan. Interesting that the dems have representatives who stand outside of polling places with a list of recommended candidates. But I always ask for a copy. Helpful to know who to vote for as well as who not to vote for.

Allow me to apologize for my typing on the last couple of posts...it was REALLY BAD!

If the NC Supreme Court ruling stands for these prisoners then I would argue that ALL NC Judges must define how each prisoner will earn "good time credits" within their sentence OR in the absence of that condition of incarceration NO GOOD TIME CAN BE EARNED.

Either way...ITS A CHANGE IN THE LAW as it stands on the books...therefore UNCONSTITUTIONAL because the NC Supreme Court does not have the authority to CHANGE LAW!

Professor why are you so PRO the prisoners on this issue? We don't always agree BUT usually you will consider the points made by others. This time you appear completely predisposed to ignore all but the prisoners point of view.

Allow me to clarify:

The prisoner filed a laws that their sentence had been unfairly changed from "Life, meaning 80 years" and "Life, without the possibility of parole". They based their argument on the facts of the Law at the time of their sentence...This the COURT CORRECTLY RULED in their favor...Life for the should mean 80 Years. BUT, The Court went one step further an "calculated good time" within the decision...THAT WENT TOO FAR. "Good Time" or how or when and by whom it is accrued WAS NOT and SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE part of the decision. "Time for Good Behavior" is NOT PART OF ANY SENTENCE/JUDGEMENT it is a WHOLELY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS seperate and appart from the Judicial System.

View Comments VIEW ALL 182 COMMENTS

Experian Credit Center

Average Credit Score: 678. See Yours Free!
1. Make sure possible inaccuracies aren't hurting your credit
2. Detect potential identity theft
3. Stay on top of your credit without hurting your score

See your Free Credit Report online in seconds when you sign up for a free 30-day credit monitoring trial!

Multimedia

advertisement