RALEIGH, N.C. — Starting Dec. 1, texting while driving could cost you.
Gov. Bev Perdue on Friday signed into law a bill that bans drivers from text messaging or sending e-mails with their cell phones.
Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently prohibit text messaging by drivers, nearly double the number just four months ago, according to the national Governors Highway Safety Association, which represents state highway safety agencies.
Supporters of the legislation say texting drivers often look down to type or keep an unstable hold on the steering wheel while typing with both hands.
Under the law, drivers would have to either pull over or wait until they have stopped their vehicle before they could text or e-mail. Violators could face a $100 fine, plus court costs.
School bus drivers, who are already barred from cell phone use on the road, would now be subject to the texting ban as well.
The bill, which narrowly passed in the Senate last week by a vote of 30-18, makes exceptions for emergency responders, as well as people who use voice-activated technology or access global navigation systems.
Senators complained it was wrong to pass a law that is difficult for police to enforce, but supporters have said there is value in sending a message.
"It's all about safety, and I think we have a lot of law-abiding citizens," said Ron Wyatt, president of a local chapter of the North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police. "If people know it's illegal, we'd hope they'd abide by those rules."
It will still be legal for adult drivers to make calls on a cell phone. A 2006 law already made it illegal for young drivers to use a cell phone, with a few exceptions.




![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/golo/2010/07/29/8054528/4c51837294be5-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/basketball/college_basketball/2010/07/28/8048556/8048556-1280354804-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/greenguide/2010/07/28/8046891/8046896-1280321857-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2010/07/28/8046702/8046705-1280320503-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2010/07/27/8045214/130823-trav1-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2010/07/26/8037446/130637-trav1-100x75.jpg)








Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries. Read our guidelines.
This story is closed for comments.
The issue isn't cellular phones and/or texting, but driving distractions period. It matters not whether the distraction is a cellular phone, children, eating, applying makeup, but for some reason it's become fashionable and easy to single out cellular phones only. I recall a accident in 1999 in Tucson AZ (I lived there then) due to a driver distraction courtesy of a car stereo, the victim was killed. There was nowhere near the outrage there would've been had a celular phone been involved.
I see the same thing where it regards cell phone's usage in restaurants, movies, grocery store lines--people say they don't like the shouting, but you can see someone shout to their friends who are with them but no one complains about that. This is a double standard and it's wrong. And I will say it--I use my cellular phone, a lot, safely, and I don't have to explain myself to anyone.
June 22, 2009 6:02 p.m.
In an election, if a candidate gets 62.5% of the vote, it's called a 'landslide'.
"Narrowly passed"???
GOLO member since July 15, 2007
June 19, 2009 7:56 p.m.
GOLO member since September 16, 2007
June 19, 2009 7:55 p.m.
GOLO member since November 7, 2007
June 19, 2009 7:37 p.m.
June 19, 2009 7:00 p.m.