DUCK, N.C. — State transportation officials have signed a preliminary agreement with private companies to build and finance a toll bridge across Currituck Sound on the North Carolina coast.
If the plan works out, the $650 million, seven-mile bridge across the sound to the northern Outer Banks could be completed as early as 2013, The News & Observer of Raleigh reported Thursday.
The state Turnpike Authority will work with ACS Infrastructure Development and Dragados USA to determine if the Mid-Currituck Bridge would be financially feasible. The companies are subsidiaries of Spanish firms.
Projected tolls on what would be the state's longest bridge would be $10 to $15 for a one-way crossing to the upscale beaches of Duck and Corolla.
"The private sector knows how to do these things more efficiently and save money and save time," said David Joyner, the turnpike authority's executive director. "It's a proven model in other countries. This is a way to get our toe in the water to explore this concept."
On a separate project, Joyner's agency tried to sell bonds for a proposed $1 billion toll road south of Research Triangle Park, but couldn't find lenders after the Wall Street decline.
The turnpike authority would be responsible for overseeing the project and the state and private firms would have to agree on tolls and other details.
Reaction to the bridge was positive from Currituck commission chairman Owen Etheridge, who said the bridge would ease summer traffic and bring the county together.
Beachgoers can spend thousands for a weekly rental at the beaches, and the new bridge could cut their drive by and hour or more because of traffic jams on the existing road to the northern Outer Banks.
"Coming in through that traffic can be a real daunting task, and I think tourists I've talked to would pay an extra $10 to get to their home here an extra hour earlier," said Adam Norko, marketing director for Seaside Vacations in Corolla."



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/02/10707648/bbpics_miyon53519-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/09/10710709/10710709-1328829176-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/basketball/2012/02/09/10705803/10705803-1328766083-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/08/10704761/10704761-1328743348-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
April 30, 2009 4:56 p.m.
April 30, 2009 12:30 p.m.
I agree; this is one of the rare projects where a toll may work. The project was never worth building only for hurricane evacuation, and that was the only reason DOT could come up with to justify it to the permitting agencies. Reducing travel time wasn't good enough, so it was never going to be built the usual way. A toll on this bridge only impacts those wanting to use it and no one else; it will be designed and built to DOT standards and if the owners can't generate enough revenue with a toll, they'll either raise the toll or end up selling it to DOT at a loss.
Like I said, though, I doubt many NC residents will ever drive on this bridge. I certainly won't; there's plenty other ways to get to the Outer Banks and that area is one I'll never need to travel to.
April 30, 2009 12:18 p.m.
April 30, 2009 12:00 p.m.
April 30, 2009 11:45 a.m.