State News

Tobacco-rich N.C. nears vote on public smoking ban

Posted March 31, 2009

— The ebbing influence of tobacco – the golden leaf that once dominated both North Carolina's economy and politics – is headed for a new test in the state that remains the country's largest tobacco grower.

Lawmakers are scheduled to vote Wednesday on outlawing smoking in restaurants, bars and almost all workplaces. The measure would dictate whether drinkers can pound a butt with their Bud and if restaurant servers must breathe secondhand smoke.

A similar effort narrowly failed in the House two years ago, as the trade group representing the state's 16,000 restaurants successfully protested an exception for private clubs.

But this year, the state's restaurateurs are neutral on the issue, which this time includes private clubs, and health advocates have marshaled money and grassroots networks to overload House members' offices with e-mails and telephone calls.

"We believe the vote count is pretty close, but we do believe we have made significant headway this year and we think the vote (House) will go in our favor," said American Heart Association lobbyist Betsy Vetter. "We think the Senate likewise will vote in our favor."

If North Carolina's smoking ban is approved this year, the state would become the 35th - and perhaps one of the most unlikely - to join a national trend of segregating the one in five Americans who smoke.

For decades, the state's politicians protected both cigarette makers and the thousands of tobacco growers whose crop was worth $686 million to North Carolina farmers in 2008 - nearly half the value of the entire U.S. output and 80 percent more than the next largest producer.

But times are changing. An Elon University poll last month found about two-thirds of North Carolinians backed a ban on public smoking indoors, and eight in 10 said they consider secondhand smoke a threat to their health.

It's a feeling shared across the tobacco-growing South.

Despite a 400-year history with tobacco that turned Virginia into the richest colony in pre-Revolution America, the state's first substantial limit on tobacco use was signed into law this month. Kentucky and South Carolina, two other leading tobacco states, have also allowed local regulations of indoor smoking. Tennessee is one of three states that exempt restaurants and bars that don't admit people under the age of 18 or 21.

Wednesday's vote in the House will take place the same day the largest federal tobacco tax increase in history takes effect. Congress also is stirring with legislation that would let the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco.

Opponents of the North Carolina smoking ban argue restaurants and other businesses should choose for themselves whether they want to welcome or turn away smokers.

"A lot of people talk about restaurants, but it reaches all small business," said Fred Bone, a lobbyist for Greensboro-based Lorillard Inc., which makes Newport cigarettes. That includes his family's used car lot in Rocky Mount, which employs smokers as the only mechanic and the only salesman, he said.

"We don't need to ban a legal product across the board," Bone said. "You simply have a property rights issue - should a person be able to smoke in his own business?"

Not if anyone else is close enough to inhale his smoke, say smoking-ban advocates like Steven Adams, who owns the Peak City Grill and Bar in Apex. The ex-smoker prohibited smoking inside his eatery when he opened three years ago both because 80 percent of the public are nonsmokers, but also out of concern for his own health and that of his workers.

"I actually bought the idea that you could let the market dictate. But I guess if the alternative that if you had signs that walking into this restaurant can be hazardous to your health, then customers would have a real choice," Adams said. "It's got to be hazardous."

The smoking ban is a personal quest for its lead sponsor, House Majority Leader Hugh Holliman, D-Davidson, a lung cancer survivor. He said he plans to use his position to jockey the legislation through a vote that could be close. He said he could delay consideration beyond Wednesday based on whether he counts more supporters or opponents on hand when the roll is called.

"It will be close," he said. "We'll be looking at who's here and who's not here."


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • weeksgroove Apr 1, 2009

    Wow. Some pretty ignorant people posting support for smoking.
    First... there is plenty of evidence to support the claim that second and third hand smoke is bad.
    Second, Smoking is not a right when it affects the health of someone else as you are now infringing on their rights.

    There is NO argument that you can make to justify the need to allow smoking in public places. You are just being selfish and dumb to think otherwise.

  • onlyyoucanhear Mar 31, 2009

    oh and osx that is another modern myth ciggarette smokers cost less overall in health care than non smokers if you want to save medical costs you should force smoking

  • onlyyoucanhear Mar 31, 2009

    while it is true that smoking stinks there is no repeat NO evidence to support harm from second hand smoke the evidence current is it must be bad why? because i think so the only true world research on 2nd hand smoke suggested the exact opposite and was buried more style over substance

  • OSX Mar 31, 2009

    Even if everybody quit right now, the health care expense for smokers is going to be around for the next 20 years.

  • MadBiker Mar 31, 2009

    "property right issue" You can't shoot your gun in a shopping mall, even though that gun is your property. You can't drive your car drunk, even though it's your property. The government already has plenty of laws in place to dictate what we can or cannot do with or on our own property. This is no different.

  • maddiesmom972 Mar 31, 2009

    Smoking is an individual right - maybe not the smartest but right this minute an individual right - TOMORROW however when the continued sociallization of America continues it wont be. And once the powers that be aren't making enough money on "SIN " taxes they will tax something else. Let's not forget what tobacco money brought into NC - most of our hospitals, probably some of our schools and no telling what else - so shut up whining - dont go where people smoke -

  • yellow_hat Mar 31, 2009

    Smokin - if government should butt out - why have the sanitation ratings? Let the free market decide if the resturant meets it's customers demands. If you get sick after eating at a resturant, just don't go there anymore. Or let your employer ignore all the OSHA laws - if you don't like it , quit!

  • Quagmire Mar 31, 2009

    Less smoking will cut down on free health care for the uninsured, more than making up the lost tax revenue.

  • Smokin Mar 31, 2009

    Enough, already! A business owner should decide for themselves whether to allow smoking or not. If you don't want to breathe "second-hand smoke" don't patronize or work there. Other than making sure a food-service establishment meets certain standards of sanitation, government should butt out.

  • Quagmire Mar 31, 2009

    Cough...Hack....Cough good