RALEIGH, N.C. — State Treasurer Janet Cowell said Thursday that the General Assembly needs to kick in an additional $358 million during the next two years to keep the state's public pension funds financially sound.
The funds lost $17 billion in value in 2008 as the nation entered a recession. The funds started 2009 with a value of $60 billion, which Cowell said is enough to cover payments to state retirees.
Cowell said last month she would ask the General Assembly for $29 million more in the next fiscal year than the roughly $400 million the pension funds already receive annually.
With Thursday's announcement, she is boosting the request for additional funding for the fiscal year that begins in July 2010 by $329 million.
The request will further burden lawmakers drawing up a state government spending plan for the next two years.
“I understand this news comes at a time when families, local and state governments and the private sector are tightening their belts as a result of the global recession,” Cowell said in a statement. “However, it is important for budget writers to take these costs into consideration as they craft their respective budgets.”
Cowell said she used actuarial formulas approved by the General Assembly to determine how much was needed to provide long-term stability for the pension system.
State employees contribute 6 percent of their annual pay into the pension system, and the state has been contributing much lower amounts in recent years – up to 2 percent – because investment gains provided enough money to cover obligations, she said. Investment earnings have accounted for 77 percent of the funds for the system in recent years, she said.
With the extra money, the state's contribution over the next two years would be about 6.6 percent of payroll, she said, noting that would be slightly above what the state should be contributing every year.
The public pension system covers 820,000 state employees and retirees. It's been cited as being among the healthiest in the country.
Cowell said the additional money from the General Assembly would not be a bailout of the pension system. The state has a contractual obligation to pay specified benefits to retired state workers, and the money is needed to ensures those obligations are met, she said.
“Employer contributions are a required cost and a contractual obligation to the 535,000 active public employees, including law enforcement officers, firefighters and teachers, covered by the plan,” she said.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717043/10717043-1328939633-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
February 20, 2009 2:59 p.m.
February 20, 2009 7:38 a.m.
Meanwhile, NC employees have to pay 6% of their low salary into a pension, get no matching in 401k, but don't have to pay for their own health insurance. But they are looking at huge increases in family coverage, again.
Also, when you withdraw your funds from retirement when you quit, you don't get the interest on your 6%. The state KEEPS that. If it was 401k, you could take it with you elsewhere.
February 20, 2009 7:34 a.m.
"Yes, that is a HUGE problem within most departments in state government. - wcnc"
And it's a huge problem in private business too! Private airplanes for automakers anyone?
February 20, 2009 7:29 a.m.
State employees don't have a choice regarding their "pensions". It's taken whether they like it or not and "soundly invested".
No offense, what should be fair to begin with is that the individual determine how to invest that portion. What happens in this case...? Someone is some office in Raleigh is determining what investments are "safe" with someone else's money? How "sound" is that?
So yes, my dear, the Pension system should also see part of the bailout considering it is also money that is taken from the employee; not in the future like money they "could" earn in another job, but money that has already been taken really without their permission.
And if it's so "nice" as you put it to be a State employee... why do you sound so envious about it?
February 19, 2009 8:32 p.m.