State News

Report: N.C. Charter Schools Need Improvement, More Diversity

Posted June 6, 2007

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— North Carolina's 100-school cap on charter schools should remain in place, at least until student performance improves and the schools are more racially integrated, a nonpartisan organization said Wednesday.

In examining data from the alternate public schools that first opened 10 years ago this fall, the North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research also said financial troubles at some schools remain worrisome and that their innovative curricula have failed to carry over to traditional schools.

"When we looked at 10 years' worth of data on all the charter schools, that's when we found that 53 percent of them were finishing in those bottom three categories on academic performance under the state ABC accountability testing system," said Ran Coble, the center's director. "Because most of them are doing not as well as traditional public schools, it's a reason to slow down and say, 'Don't expand the experiment before you've got something that works.'"

The report likely will build confidence among education groups skeptical of charter schools, which are run by private boards and administrators and don't have to follow all the regulations imposed on traditional public schools. They receive roughly $200 million in public money annually and don't charge tuition.

House and Senate bills that were filed this year to eliminate the 100-school cap have gone nowhere. The state budget that the House passed would permit the Department of Public Instruction to study whether the schools have met goals set by initial legislation approved in 1996. The budget is in negotiations between the House and Senate.

"We were hoping that this experiment would reap innovative trends that would be good for (traditional) schools," said Eddie Davis, president of the North Carolina Association of Educators. "We just have not seen very much of that."

But Tom Humble, principal of Raleigh Charter High School, said the report "ignores the complexity of what charter schools are doing."

Charter school supporters have said the cap needs to be lifted because thousands of children are on waiting lists to attend. They also argue that many students who don't make the grade in traditional schools benefit from the intimate environment charters usually bring.

"Predictably, the report does not address the growing demand for charter schools," said Terry Stoops, an education policy analyst at the conservative-leaning John Locke Foundation in Raleigh. "Poll after poll shows that a majority of North Carolinians want more charter schools."

"It really is pretty silly to me to not raise the cap. We've got a waiting list trying to get into charter schools," said state Sen. Neal Hunt, R-Wake, who is sponsoring one of seven bills pending in the General Assembly that would raise or remove the cap.

"That's the market research that ought to be considered by the General Assembly, that the parents like what's going on," Humble said.

A similar 2002 study by the center also said the cap should remain, in part because there wasn't enough information on student test scores to make a judgment.

The new report, however, found that charter schools performed about the same or slightly worse than traditional schools on student test scores and high school graduation rates.

During the 2005-06 school year, for example, 53 percent of the charter schools were either labeled as failing to attain the academic progress expected of them or fell into the worst categories on end-of-year tests, compared with 48 percent for all public schools.

According to the report, four Wake County charter schools -- Quest Academy, Magellan Charter School, Exploris School and Raleigh Charter High -- were listed among the highest-performing schools in the state.

But three other local schools -- Torchlight Academy, Baker Charter High School and SPARC Academy -- were among the lowest-performing charter schools statewide.

Officials with Torchlight Academy and SPARC Academy couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday. Baker Charter High, which served students in the Wake County Jail, had its charter revoked last year after an investigation showed the school excluded eligible students and failed to keep accurate attendance records.

The report recommended that schools not meeting expected academic growth for five straight years be placed on probation for two years, then closed if they don't reach it. Charter school leaders have said many students who wind up in their schools perform poorly academically and can't excel on standardized scores overnight.

Charter schools also don't appear to "reasonably reflect the racial and ethnic composition" of the school districts where they are, the report said.

While North Carolina's population is almost 22 percent black, 39 of the 99 charter schools during 2005-06 had a nonwhite population that exceeded 50 percent. The student population at 14 of the schools was more than 95 percent black, the report said.

Jack Moyer, director of the North Carolina Office of Charter Schools, said the law allows racial composition to reflect "the special population that the school seeks to serve." Some schools have focused their attention on helping black students, he said.

"I wish there was more diversity," Moyer said in an interview, but "I truly believe that they're working at it."

Moyer also said ethnic and racial makeup within the overall charter school student population is largely in line with the student population in the rest of North Carolina's public schools.

The report also urged the State Board of Education to grant future charters in counties that don't have any now. Wake County has 14 of the 93 charter schools currently in operation.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • lollly52 Jun 8, 2007

    North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research
    Does anyone know the "bias" of this group above? Given that charter schools are "chartered", and not held to the diversity rules of public schools, it seems to me that the "findings" would be a foregone conclusion.
    I had a kid in Raleigh Charter. It was a fantastic school. Looks like the powers that be want nothing except the mediocrity of public schools – and no other options.

  • thewayitis Jun 7, 2007

    Continuing my thoughts below...For example, take the Charter School Omuteko Gwamaziima. On their web page, they have the following statement "Omuteko Gwamaziima was founded response to the absence of educational institutions in the community that addressed the needs of African American children." That is a pretty narrow focus and targets only a specific population. With a focus like that, you will not have a diverse population. Here is the web link if you want to see for yourself: BTW, could you imagine the public outcry if a school was designed specifically to meet the needs of Caucasion children? How can we have this double standard, and allow a public school, albeit charter, to target one segment of the population, but not others?

  • thewayitis Jun 7, 2007

    The way charters were given to schools sets some of them up for failure -- many charters were given to schools in low-income areas, with a specific type of student targeted. Many of these schools are not really desirable to the general population, so there will be a high percentage of at-risk children.

    Personally, I don't think charters should be given to schools with such a narrow focus, when there are so many good charter schools around that are trying to serve the general population. But that is part of the whole politically-correct train of thought -- the need to overcompensate for diversity reasons and give charters to schools designed to serve specific minority populations, rather than to schools that will serve ALL children.

  • madth Jun 6, 2007

    so, some public policy group came up with this report on the failure of charter schools. if anyone truly believes this report i have some ocean front property in arizona for sale!!!!! ANY TAKERS?????

  • djofraleigh Jun 6, 2007

    Charter schools, over the years, perform about the same as public schools, only cheaper for the county -- No building costs, no gas or bus or bus driver money, no lunch program money.

    Wake County has 4K in charters and around 1700 in homeschooling, which would mean a lot of building if they suddenly went back into WCPSS.

    Good to see all these people talking about schools.
    Tell the county commissioners to slow growth.

  • -info- Jun 6, 2007

    I have had kids in both types, whether people want to be honest or not with themselves, charter schools do work and until you have a child in one actually your input is null and void...the parents makes these schools work...they serve on the boards, they transport their kids, they make their lunches and they fill in when needed...public education is a product of self demise where a high percentage of kids are there just because there is no place else to cant get the lost causes out because theres this idea because some self rightous adults think all kids are college material..what a joke...............I like how other countries do higher education, must pass a test to be accepted into high school, I bet we could save billions.....

  • peppercorns Jun 6, 2007

    THe Heck with diversity!!!!
    These schools need to take the brightest childern with an interest for that particular magnet school. Color and creed should have NOTHING to do with it. If the end up all one way, the other way,mixed ot whatever.... fine!
    These days EVEY STUDENT has the ability to suceed no matter what color and creed. All this exception and excuse stuff should be thrown out once and for all. Allowing a student in with a lower grade just because they are a dufferent race or religion is an insult to those of that race who can make it and do not need the exceptions and excuses.

  • bill0 Jun 6, 2007

    roxheel - I'm not even sure how to respond. Obviously, you have poor reading comprehension skills if you think support for successful charter schools and voucher programs equates to "labor union." Right now, more charter schools are failing than public schools. If you think that is a great investment, you must have gone to one of the failing schools.

    We need to support programs that work - not just sound good. NC schools are below average nationally. If charter schools are performing BELOW the below average schools, something is obviously wrong.

  • roxheel Jun 6, 2007

    Wow Bill, spoken like a true Labor union Rep. Rip the chater school while your public schools fall down behind you, nice try though.

  • bill0 Jun 6, 2007

    Well, it apparently only took a few years for charters to become part of the "establishment." As evidenced in this thread, there are all sorts of people supporting mediocre results. It is the exact same mentality that fights change in the regular public schools - defend the turf at all cost! I've very much in favor of the charter school idea (and vouchers too) but for it work, you have to reward success, not failure. So far, charters are averaging worse than public schools. That is the fact of the situation. Unless you expand the ideas that work and ditch the ones that don't, you aren't going to improve.