State News

Lawmakers Mull Moving Up Presidential Primary

Posted March 13, 2007

— With a native son on the presidential ballot again, North Carolina lawmakers are considering whether to move the presidential primary to earlier in the year or scrap it for party caucuses.

The Senate Judiciary Committee discussed a bill Tuesday that would move North Carolina's presidential primary from May to early February -- or even late January after the New Hampshire primary. Committee members asked staffers to research the issue more before it is brought up again at the next meeting.

"People on the street that have talked to me, they love the idea. They want to have the chance to ask the next presidential candidate questions," said Sen. Andrew Brock, R-Davie, who is sponsoring the bill.

Brock and other political observers said they're concerned that North Carolina has little say in the national race because it's usually decided by the time the state's primaries are held.

"By the time North Carolina votes in these primaries, the nominee is almost always selected, and that's bad because these early states get their issues on the national agenda," said Chris Heagarty, executive director of the North Carolina Center for Voter Education.

North Carolina's last presidential year primaries were delayed until July by a court fight over redistricting. The Democrats held caucuses to choose candidates, but by that time, U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina had been eliminated from the race.

In 2000, George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore also had locked up their nominations before North Carolina held its primaries.

But splitting the presidential and state primaries would cost the state about $5.5 million, which is why some people support replacing primaries with early caucuses, where Democratic and Republican activists make the decisions.

"If you have a 20 percent turnout at the cost of $5.5 million, I don't think that's a very good use of taxpayer money," said Sen. Tony Rand, D-Cumberland.

Sen. Richard Stevens, R-Wake, said caucuses would use the political parties' regular precinct mechanisms.

"It's less costly," Stevens said of caucuses. "It wouldn't be a statewide election."

Critics of the early primary idea also point out that other states appear to be rushing to push up their primaries. That could create a political logjam, they said, meaning candidates might spend little time in North Carolina.

"If all the other states are moving forward, why are we sitting back and waiting?" Heagarty asked.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • wjcspanteach Mar 13, 2007

    Having the primary in Feb is a great idea to 1) encourage more people to participate in these primaries (as they will actually matter) 2) Give us a voice in who is ON the presidential ticket. SO --- MOVE IT!!

  • Wildman Mar 13, 2007

    so now our legislature wants to jump on the bandwagon to move a primary...what a waste..several states already doing this in order to have their voice serve as primary or leading influence on national elections by having their result viewed as precursor of general electorate.

    sad that politics has degenerated to a series of ploys and games.

  • mvnull Mar 13, 2007

    If we really wanted to save time and money without affecting the outcome, all we need to do is to calculate how much money each candidate has and give the nomination to the one who has the most. It's all about the Benjamins.