RALEIGH, N.C. — An author who has studied state-sponsored sterilization programs that came before Nazi Germany adopted the practice is in North Carolina a month before lawmakers consider compensating victims.
Edwin Black is speaking Wednesday at the General Assembly in Raleigh and later in Research Triangle Park at events co-sponsored by Campbell University's law school. He's authored a history of the eugenics movement in America.
From 1929 to 1974, more than 7,600 people in North Carolina were surgically rendered unable to reproduce under state laws and rules that targeted people deemed unfit to be parents. They included epileptics, those considered mentally defective, and many who were simply poor.
Many state lawmakers have come together on the issue, attempting to right the wrong by compensating the victims of the state's sterilization program. Janice Black, who was sterilized as a teenager, says there isn't much North Carolina can do to apologize for what happened to her.
"No amount of money is going to repay back what's been taken from me," said Black.
State Eugenics Task Force chair Laura Gerald says she knows it's hard to put a number on the pain caused by the sterilization program, but said she hopes compensation can recognize the state's mistake and help victims.
"Compensation also serves a collective purpose to the state and sends a clear message that we in North Carolina are are a people who pay for our mistakes," Gerald said. "We do not tolerate bureaucracies that trample on basic human rights."
Gov. Beverly Perdue in March asked victims of the sterilization program to come forward as she puts together a budget that includes compensation for them.
The task force report last year said up to 2,000 of the victims were still alive, though the state has verified only 111 so far.



![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Your analogy is false and misguided. The services you describe are for ALL, not a specialized few. Welfare and food stamps is NOT the same as police force or firedepartment.
And yes, you incur a bill at the hospital with a heart attack.. THAT IS YOUR BILL to pay. No matter how long it takes.. work out a payment plan. Why is it you libs think it is OUR responsibility to pay YOUR bills.. no matter how high. If I made poor decisions, misspent my life, made choices that led me to be a middle aged man without health insurance, then I screwed up.. it is not your responsibility to pay for me. I should have made better choices. Stop trying to muddy the waters. These people were sterilized NOT because of a "time of need" but because they are incapable of sustaining their own lives, let alone raising children. (I understand exceptions exist) We would pay for them and theirs, for generations to come.. YOU PAY if you want
April 25, 2012 12:48 p.m.
April 25, 2012 12:33 p.m.
And it would turn out just like this, or the mortgage bubble. People would claim they were coerced, they didn't understand what they were signing, etc. Hey, it's working as far as getting their mortgages eventually forgiven (wait and see!), why wouldn't it work for every other "reward for ignorance" - like the current one.
More stick, less carrot. Limit people's welfare cash and the birth rate will drop. Could we at least try it? Nothing else has worked.
April 25, 2012 12:30 p.m.
April 25, 2012 11:59 a.m.
But, if the gov't started to charge people for services rendered in their time of need, why not charge ALL people for services in their time of need?
No health insurance?...but you end up in the ER with a heart attack and a $250,000 bypass surgery bill or a $300,000 cancer bill or a $150,000 head injury bill?...sell your house and all your possessions and have all your future paychecks garnished. Ok for you?
What about fire department, police services, etc....?
April 25, 2012 11:52 a.m.